FL TAA 98C1-008 Corporate Income Tax and Emergency Excise Tax 1998-10-09

Was a court-ordered class-action settlement account subject to Florida corporate income tax or return filing?

Short answer: No. The court-ordered bank account merely segregated and distributed class-action settlement funds under a consent decree. It was not a statutory artificial entity or Florida corporate-income-tax taxpayer, so it owed no Florida corporate income tax and did not have to file a Florida return.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1998. Ezel answers yours, under current Florida tax law, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1998
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This Florida Technical Assistance Advisement classified one bank account created and controlled by a federal consent decree to pay class-action claimants. Under section 213.22, it binds the Department only for the redacted requester and those facts. A separately organized legal entity, materially different court order or administration, or later law can produce different tax and filing duties.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Subject

Taxability of Bank Account

Plain-English summary

The court-ordered class-action settlement bank account was not subject to Florida corporate income tax and did not have to file a Florida return. The account existed to segregate money contributed by the defendant and distribute it to class members and other qualified claimants under a federal consent decree.

The court specified eligibility, claim classes, payment priorities, disbursement procedures, records, and reporting. Plaintiffs' counsel administered the account. Although federal rules required a federal income-tax return for the account and federal tax was paid, Florida found that the account was not a corporation or other artificial entity created under a statute.

What this means for you

A federal filing obligation did not by itself make this account a Florida corporate taxpayer. The Department focused on the legal character of the arrangement: it was a court-controlled account used to hold and pay settlement money, not a separately created statutory entity.

Common questions

Q: Did the account earn income and file federally? Yes. The administrator reported its income and paid federal income tax, but that did not control the Florida entity analysis.

Q: Why was no Florida corporate return required? The account did not fit Florida's definition of a corporation or artificial legal entity subject to the corporate income tax.

Q: Would every settlement fund receive the same result? Not necessarily. This ruling depended on the consent decree and the account's specific legal structure and administration.

Citations and references

  • Fla. Stat. § 220.02 — legislative intent and entities subject to corporate income tax
  • Fla. Stat. § 220.03(1)(e), (aa) — corporation and taxpayer definitions
  • Fla. Stat. § 220.11(1) — corporate income tax
  • Fla. Stat. § 220.22(1) — Florida return filing requirement
  • Fla. Admin. Code r. 12C-1.022 — corporate return requirements
  • Fla. Stat. § 213.22 — Technical Assistance Advisements

Source

Original ruling text

Oct 09, 1998

Re: Technical Assistance Advisement 98(C)1-008
XXX ("Defendant")
Corporate Income Tax - Taxability of Bank Account
Sections 220.02, 220.03, 220.11, 220.22, F.S.

Dear :

Your letter of February 16, 1998, requested a Technical
Assistance Advisement on the corporate income tax consequences
of a bank account established to pay out the settlement of a
class action lawsuit. You supplemented that request with your
letter of September 30, 1998. This response to your request
constitutes a Technical Assistance Advisement under Chapter
12-11, Florida Administrative Code, and is issued to you under
the authority of s. 213.22, Florida Statutes.

FACTS

As the result of a class action lawsuit, a Consent Decree
was entered by a U.S. District Judge in Florida. As part of the
settlement agreement, the Consent Decree ordered the
establishment of an account with a national banking association
designated by plaintiffs' counsel and approved by the Court.
The deposits made to the account by the defendant were to be
distributed, as set forth in the Consent Decree, to the various
class plaintiffs and other class claimants. Plaintiffs' counsel
is responsible for administering the payment process, including
disbursements made from the bank account to the class plaintiffs
and other class claimants.

The court retained jurisdiction of the matter for a period
of ten years after the entry of the Consent Decree, with
provisions for earlier termination if all contributions had been
made and all other terms of the agreement had been met. The
Consent Decree specifically sets out the method for determining
eligibility for payment, the different classes of claims, the
procedure for identification of claimants, the priority of

different claims, the procedures for disbursement of funds, and
reporting and record-keeping requirements. In other words, the
entire mechanism for payment of claims from the bank account is
established by the court in the Consent Decree.

Pursuant to federal income tax provisions, plaintiffs'
counsel, as administrator of the account, filed a Form XXX to
report the income earned by the account, and paid federal income
tax.

REQUESTED RULING

You request a ruling that the bank account is not an entity
subject to the Florida Income Tax Code, s. 220.02, F.S., et seq.

STATUTORY AUTHORITY

Section 220.11(1), F.S., states in part:

A tax measured by net income is hereby imposed on every
taxpayer for each taxable year... for the privilege of
conducting business, earning or receiving income in this
state, or being a resident or citizen of this state...

Section 220.02(1), F.S., states in part:

It is the intent of the Legislature in enacting this code
to impose a tax upon all corporations, organizations,
associations, and other artificial entities which derive
from this state or from any other jurisdiction permanent
and inherent attributes not inherent or available to
natural persons, such as perpetual life, transferable
ownership represented by shares or certificates, and
limited liability for all owners....

Section 220.03(1), F.S., includes the following language:

(e) "Corporation" includes... all other... legal entities,
and artificial persons which are created by or pursuant to
the statutes of this state, the United States, or any other

state, territory, possession, or jurisdiction. The term
"corporation" does not include proprietorships, even if
using a fictitious name; partnerships of any type, as such;
state or public fairs or expositions, under chapter 616;
estates of decedents or incompetents; testamentary trusts;
or private trusts.
(aa) "Taxpayer" means any corporation subject to the tax
imposed by this code, and includes all corporations for
which a consolidated return is filed under s. 220.131....
[Emphasis added]

Section 220.22(1), F.S., provides:

A return with respect to the tax imposed by this code shall
be made by every taxpayer for each taxable year in which
such taxpayer either is liable for tax under this code or
is required to make a federal income tax return, regardless
of whether such taxpayer is liable for tax under this code.

Rule 12C-1.022, F.A.C., provides:

Returns; Filing Requirement.
(1) In general, every corporation as defined in s.
220.03(1)(e), F.S., subject to tax under Part II of Chapter
220, F.S., and every bank and savings association subject
to tax under Part VII of Chapter 220, F.S., shall make a
return of income for each taxable year in which such entity
is either liable for tax under the Florida Income Tax Code,
or is required to make a federal income tax return,
regardless of whether such taxpayer is liable for tax under
the Florida Income Tax Code.
(a) The Florida Income Tax Code does not specifically
provide for an exception from the filing requirements for
any organization, association, or legal entity. Therefore,
every corporation, as defined in s. 220.03(1)(e), F.S., and
every bank or savings association, as defined in s. 220.62,
F.S., will be required to file a return absent a specific
provision within the Internal Revenue Code or the Treasury
Regulations exempting the entity from filing a federal tax
return or a letter of determination from the Internal
Revenue Service providing that the entity does not have a

federal filing requirement. [Emphasis added]

DISCUSSION

According to the facts provided and the terms of the
Consent Decree, a bank account was established pursuant to the
court's order to segregate the monies prior to payment to the
class plaintiffs and qualified claimants. As such, it does not
appear to fit within the definition of "corporation" found in s.
220.03(1)(e), Fla.Stat. Despite the requirements of the
Internal Revenue Code that require the account to file a return
under XXX, the bank account is not an artificial entity
"...created by or pursuant to the statutes of this state, the
United States, or any other state, territory, possession or
jurisdiction". Consequently, the bank account is not an entity
subject to the Florida corporate income tax, and is not a
taxpayer required to file a Florida return.

This response constitutes a Technical Assistance Advisement
under s. 213.22, F.S., which is binding on the Department only
under the facts and circumstances described in the request for
this advice as specified in s. 213.22, F.S. Our response is
based on those facts and specific situation summarized above.
You are advised that subsequent statutory or administrative rule
changes judicial interpretations of the statutes or rules upon
this advice is based may subject similar future transactions to
a different treatment than expressed in this response.

You are further advised that this response and your request
are public records under Chapter 119, F.S., which are subject to
disclosure to the public under the conditions of s. 213.22, F.S.
Your name, address, and any other details which might lead to
identification of the taxpayer must be deleted by the Department
before disclosure. In an effort to protect the confidentiality
of such information, we request that you notify the undersigned
in writing within 15 days of any deletions you wish made to the
request or the response.

Sincerely,

Deborah D. Hart
Assistant General Counsel

DDH/ms

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 1998 ruling on this question. Ezel checks current Florida tax law and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.