FL TAA 98B4-007 Documentary Stamp Tax 1998-05-18

Which credit-union open-end loan forms triggered Florida documentary stamp tax on advances?

Short answer: The signed disclosure, open-end agreement, and credit application was taxable on an initial advance made when it was executed because it contained a promise to pay, a sum certain, and the borrower's signature. The funds voucher, rate addendum, and later disbursement request were not taxable because each lacked required elements in one document or by express incorporation.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1998. Ezel answers yours, under current Florida tax law, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1998
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This Florida Technical Assistance Advisement applied 1998 documentary-stamp-tax law to four specific credit-union forms, their exact promises, amounts, signature mechanics, incorporation language, and advance timing. Under section 213.22, it binds the Department only for that lender and those facts. Different wording, electronic signatures, incorporated documents, advance methods, execution timing, or later law could change the result.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Subject

Credit Union Forms

Plain-English summary

Only the combined Truth-in-Lending disclosure, open-end credit agreement, and credit application was documentary-stamp taxable on the initial advance made when the borrower executed it. That document contained all three elements Florida required: a promise to pay, a sum certain, and the borrower's signature.

The other reviewed forms were not taxable written obligations:

  • A later loan-disbursement request lacked both a promise to pay and the borrower's signature.
  • A funds-advance voucher stated the amount, and endorsement of a check could supply a signature, but the voucher did not itself contain all three elements or expressly incorporate the check and prior agreement for the missing elements.
  • An interest-rate addendum supplied rate information but not the required promise, sum, and signature.

The ruling also said an advance activated by credit card, charge card, or debit card was not subject to documentary stamp tax under the cited rule.

What this means for you

The tax analysis followed the face of each document. Since July 1, 1997, the source said the promise, definite amount, and borrower signature had to appear in one document unless that document expressly incorporated another writing containing the missing element.

A form's practical connection to a broader credit arrangement was not enough. The incorporation language and the actual advance method mattered.

Common questions

Q: What three elements made a written obligation taxable? A promise to pay, a sum certain in money, and the borrower's signature.

Q: Was every advance under the open-end plan taxable? No. The ruling taxed the initial advance made with execution of the complete agreement but did not tax the reviewed later disbursement request.

Q: Did endorsing the advance check make the voucher taxable? No. Although endorsement supplied a signature, the voucher did not expressly incorporate the check and prior agreement to assemble all required elements.

Q: Were card-activated advances taxable? No under the rule cited in the advisement.

Citations and references

  • Fla. Stat. § 201.08 — documentary stamp tax on written obligations to pay money
  • Fla. Stat. § 201.08(6) — required elements in one document unless another document is expressly incorporated
  • Fla. Admin. Code r. 12B-4.053(20) — advances activated by credit, charge, or debit card
  • Fla. Stat. § 213.22 — Technical Assistance Advisements

Source

Original ruling text

May 18, 1998

Re: Technical Assistance Advisement No. 98(B)4-007
Documentary Stamp Tax/Credit Union Forms
s. 201.08, F.S.
XXX (Lender)

Dear :

This is in response to your request for a Technical
Assistance Advisement in which you ask if the Florida
documentary stamp tax imposed by s. 201.08, F.S., is due upon
certain credit union loan forms.

Proposed Transaction

The forms under consideration are:

  1. Truth-in-Lending Disclosure Statement and Agreement
    for Open-end Credit Plan and Credit Application (Form
    XX) Part B-Credit Union Copy and Part C-Credit Union
    Copy
  2. Funds Advance Voucher (No Form Number)
  3. Interest Rate Addendum to Truth-in-Lending Disclosure
    Statement and Agreement (No Form Number)
  4. Request for Loan Disbursement (No Form Number)

Discussion and Law

Section 201.08, F.S., imposes tax on written obligations to
pay a sum certain in money that are signed by the borrower.

The following three elements are required under s. 201.08,
F.S., for the imposition of documentary stamp tax on a written
obligation to pay:

  1. A promise to pay.
  2. A sum certain in money.
  3. Signature of the Borrower.

Effective July 1, 1997, due to creation of s. 201.08(6),
F.S., by Section 2, Chapter 97-123, Law of Florida, in order for
a document to be subject to tax the essential elements must be
contained in one document, unless another document containing
the remaining elements is expressly incorporated into the
original document.

Item 1 above (Truth-In-Lending Disclosure Statement and
Agreement for Open-end Credit Plan and Credit Application)
states: "I promise to pay you the aggregate of all sums
advanced...." The Credit Application portion of this form
states the amount of the first advance (sum certain). The form
requires the signature of the borrower. This form contains all
the elements necessary to subject it to documentary stamp tax
under s. 201.08, F.S., on the first advance made directly to the
borrower.

Part C of this form contains a provision for receiving
advances under a credit card. Under Rule 12B-4.053 (20),
F.A.C., effective December 30, 1997, if an advance is activated
with the use of a credit card, charge card, or debit card, the
advance is not subject to documentary stamp tax.

Subsequent advances submitted on a Request for Loan
Disbursement Form (Item 4) would not be subject to the tax.
Item 4 does not contain the promise to pay nor the signature of
the borrower.

The Funds Advance Voucher (Item 2) contains the amount
advanced (a sum certain). No signature is required on the form
itself. However, the form specifies:

Endorsement and/or negotiation of the check issued by the
borrower(s) or on behalf of the borrower(s) constitutes
acceptance of the terms and conditions of this Funds
Advance Voucher and of the previously executed Disclosure
Statement and Agreement.

Endorsement of the check is the signature of the borrower.

This form is not subject to tax under s. 201.08, F.S.,
because the form itself does not contain the three required
elements to subject it to the tax. The form does not expressly
incorporate another document (check) containing the signature of
the borrower or the promise to pay.

The Interest Rate Addendum (Item 3) gives information about
interest rate charges and does not contain the three required
elements to subject it to the tax under s. 201.08, F.S.

Department's Position

Item 1 is subject to documentary stamp tax under s. 201.08,
F.S., on the initial advance if the initial advance is made at
the time of the execution of the document. Items 2, 3 and 4 are
not subject to documentary stamp tax under s. 201.08, F.S.

This response constitutes a Technical Assistance Advisement
under s. 213.22, F.S., which is binding on the Department only
under the facts and circumstances described in the request for
this advice as specified in s. 213.22, F.S. Our response is
predicated on those facts and the specific situation summarized
above. You are advised that subsequent statutory or
administrative rule changes or judicial interpretations of the
statutes or rules upon which this advice is based may subject
similar future transactions to a treatment different from that
expressed in this response.

You are further advised that this response and your request
are public records under Chapter 119, F.S., which are subject to
disclosure to the public under the conditions of s. 213.22, F.S.
Your name, address, and any other details which might lead to
identification of the taxpayer must be deleted by the Department
before disclosure. In an effort to protect the confidentiality
of such information, we request you notify the undersigned in
writing within 15 days of any deletions you wish made to the
request or the response.

Sincerely,

M.E. Clemens, C.P.A.

Senior Tax Specialist
Technical Assistance and Dispute Resolution
Office of General Counsel

MEC/mh

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 1998 ruling on this question. Ezel checks current Florida tax law and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.