Were separately billed country-club assessments used to repay golf-course renovation debt taxable admissions?

Short answer No. The assessments were nontaxable capital contributions because equity members paid them to retire debt from major golf-course improvements, they were separately billed and restricted to debt service, and they neither bought facility access nor reduced dues or paid operating expenses.
State
FL
Ruling
TAA 98A-067
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1998-08-24
Issued by
Florida Department of Revenue
Requested by
A redacted not-for-profit equity-membership country club

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1998. Ask about yours and see what current Florida tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1998
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This Florida Technical Assistance Advisement applied 1998 admissions-tax law to one redacted equity country club's separately billed assessments for golf-course capital debt. Under section 213.22, it binds the Department only for that requester and those facts. Member ownership, use rights, billing, segregation of funds, debt purpose, operating expenses, dues treatment, and later law can change the result.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Subject

Capital Improvement Assessments

Plain-English summary

The country club's capital assessments were not taxable admissions. Equity members paid the assessments to retire debt incurred for a major golf-course renovation and redesign. The club separately billed the amounts and placed the proceeds in a separate account used for debt service.

The assessments did not give members a right to use the club, did not reduce membership dues or fees, and did not pay operating expenses. Florida therefore treated them as owner capital contributions rather than taxable club dues or admission fees.

The Department relied on the same distinction recognized in the John's Island Club decision: paid-in capital for genuine capital improvements did not fall within the ordinary meaning of club “dues” or “fees.”

What this means for you

A club assessment is not nontaxable merely because the invoice calls it “capital.” The ruling depended on equity-member status, a specific capital project, separate billing and accounting, restricted use for capital debt, and no connection to facility access, reduced dues, or operating costs.

Common questions

Q: Did the assessments buy or preserve access to club facilities? No. The Department expressly found that they did not entitle members to use the facilities.

Q: Could the club use the assessment proceeds for operations? Not under the described facts. The proceeds were segregated and used to service the capital-project debt.

Q: Did the assessments replace ordinary dues or fees? No. They did not reduce the club's membership dues or fees.

Citations and references

  • Fla. Stat. §§ 212.02(1), 212.04 — club dues and fees included in taxable admissions
  • Fla. Admin. Code r. 12A-1.005(5)(d)1.b. — periodic club assessments for capital improvements or operating costs
  • Florida Department of Revenue v. John's Island Club, Inc., 680 So. 2d 475 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996)
  • Oklahoma City Golf & Country Club v. Oklahoma Tax Commission, 825 P.2d 267 (Okla. 1992)
  • Fla. Stat. § 213.22 — Technical Assistance Advisements

OCR citation check: both case citations in the scanned ruling resolved in the required list-mode verification. The names, reporters, court abbreviations, years, and operative holding were also reread against the official PDF images.

Source

Original ruling text

SUMMARY

Capital assessments charged to member owners of equity membership in country club to pay off loan incurred by capital improvement expenditures are not taxable "admissions" pursuant to section 212.04, F.S., where the assessments are substantively a capital contribution by the member owners of the club. The assessments did not entitle the member to use the club's facilities, did not result in

a decrease in the club membership dues or fees and they

were not used to pay operating expenses.

Aug 24, 1998

Re: Technical Assistance Advisement - TAA-98A-067 Sales and Use Tax; Capital Improvement Assessments Section 212.04, F.S., Section 212.02(1), F.S.

Rule 12A-1.005(5)(d)1.b., F.A.C.

Dear:

This is in response to your letter of XXX, requesting an advisement regarding the assessments made against equity club members of the Taxpayer. You provided copies of the bylaws, credit agreement, financial statements, and member billing

letters.

FACTS

The Taxpayer was reincorporated in 1974 under Chapter 617 of the Florida Not-For-Profit Corporation Act. The Taxpayer is a

private, equity membership country club with amenities such as restaurant facilities, golf pro shop, an 18-hole golf course and

a limited number of tennis courts. The purpose of the Taxpayer

is to operate a private social club for the benefit of its

members. There are varying member classifications, with varying rights. Equity members receive a membership certificate in lieu

of stock upon paying a minimum of $8,000 for the certificate,

plus initiation fees. Non-equity members are selected from an approved waiting list with a predetermined priority. Prior

initiation fees are credited to additional initiation fees when purchasing an equity ownership. Equity members and some other membership classifications have full use privileges, while some

are restricted in use privileges.

The Taxpayer's Board of Governors adopted an annual budget sufficient to maintain and operate the club and to fulfill its obligations. Upon such adoption of the annual budget, the Board of Governors sets forth the annual dues rates and fees for each respective membership category charged to each member of the club. No member may waive or otherwise escape liability for the amounts charged without risk of being expelled and having their membership certificate confiscated, if applicable. As of September 30, 1994, Founder member's equity was $2,159,581. Membership dues, fees, and operating assessments are recognized as revenue on a pro rata basis over the period covered by the

billing.

In 1994, the Taxpayer obtained a line of credit for $2,500,000. The loan proceeds were used to fund a major course renovation and redesign. The debt is to be paid by the end of 2001. The audited financial statements reflected that $2,803,004 were expended for the renovation and redesign. An assessment was levied against the member owners. The assessment was billed monthly, with the monies deposited into a separate account from the operations fund. The bank was granted a perfected security interest in the Taxpayer's personal property including without limitation the Taxpayer's rights to assess and collect assessments from the members. The loan agreement provided for various restrictive covenants and negative pledge agreements

related to real property.

QUESTION PRESENTED

Are the capital assessment billings subject to state sales tax?

TAXPAYER'S POSITION

It is your position that the capital assessment charged to the

members for repayment of debt directly related to funding a member approved golf course capital project is a capital assessment exempt from sales tax. You believe it is similar to the assessments in Florida Department of Revenue v. John's

Island Club, Inc., 680 So.2d 475, (Fla 1st DCA 1996).

You provide several factors you feel are relevant. The Founder members approved the special assessment to perform a specific major, golf course (capital) renovation project. The Taxpayer secured bank financing to fund the construction/renovation expenditures. The Founder members approved a Fiscal Reform Plan which, among other things, approved billing all members a

special assessment in various stipulated amounts (depending upon membership category) to repay the debt related to funding the capital project. The Taxpayer separately billed the assessment

to members on a monthly basis. The Taxpayer separately accounted for the assessment proceeds and physically designated the assessment proceeds to a separate bank account. Amounts disbursed from the account were only made payable to the Bank for debt service costs. The special assessment dollars were not commingled with operating funds and had no impact on dues rates. The special assessment dollars were expended in accordance with the originally stipulated terms of the member approved fiscal reform plan. The taxpayer expended more dollars on the capital project than what was borrowed, supporting that the debt was

entirely capital funding related.

APPLICABLE AUTHORITY

Section 212.04, F.S, provides in part:

212.04 Admissions tax; rate, procedure, enforcement.-- (1)(a) It is hereby declared to be the legislative intent that every person is exercising a taxable privilege who

sells or receives anything of value by way of admissions.

(b) For the exercise of such privilege, a tax is levied at the rate of 6 percent of sales price, or the actual value received from such admissions, which 6 percent shall be added to and collected with all such admissions from the

purchaser thereof, and such tax shall be paid for the

exercise of the privilege as defined in the preceding

paragraph....

The term "Admissions" is defined under s. 212.02(1), F.S., in

part as follows:

The following terms and phrases when used in this chapter have the meanings ascribed to them in this section, except

where the context clearly indicates a different meaning:

(1) The term "admissions" means and includes... all dues and fees paid to private clubs and membership clubs providing recreational or physical fitness facilities, including, but not limited to, golf, tennis, swimming, yachting, boating, athletic, exercise, and fitness

facilities, except physical fitness facilities owned or

operated by any hospital licensed under chapter 395.

Rule 12A-1.005(5)(d)1.b., F.A.C., provides:

(5) DUES AND INITIATION FEES, EQUITY AND NONEQUITY MEMBERSHIPS, CAPITAL CONTRIBUTIONS AND ASSESSMENTS, REFUNDABLE AND NONREFUNDABLE DEPOSITS, AND USER FEES.

(d)1. Effective July 1, 1991, the following fees paid to private clubs as condition precedent to, in conjunction with, or for the use of the club's recreational or physical

fitness facilities are subject to tax.

b. Any periodic assessments (additional paid in capital) required to be paid by members of an equity or non-equity club for capital improvements or other operating costs, unless the periodic assessment meets the criteria of a refundable deposit as provided in sub-subparagraph 2.e.

below....

Section 212.04, F.S., taxes all "dues" and "fees" paid to

private and membership clubs providing recreational or physical fitness facilities, including, but not limited to golf, tennis, swimming . . ., unless specifically exempt. Rule 12A-1.005(5),

F.A.C.

"Dues" and "fees" are not defined in Chapter 212, F.S., or in Rule 12A-1.005, F.A.C.; therefore, we must look to the ordinary usage of the terms, as was done in Oklahoma City Golf and

Country Club v. Oklahoma Tax Commission, 825 P.2d 267 (OKI.

1992). In that case, the court used the definition of "dues" as found in Black's Law Dictionary 450 (5th ed. 1979)("Black's")

and Webster's Third New International Dictionary 699 (1963)("Webster's"). Black's defines "dues," as applied to

clubs, as "sums paid toward support and maintenance of same and as a requisite to retain membership." "Dues" are defined by Webster's as "the fee or charge required for membership,

affiliation, initiation, use, subscription."

For the term "fees," it is appropriate to look to the dictionary definition for the common meaning of the term in the same manner as the court did in the above cited case. "Fees" are defined in

The American Heritage Dictionary (2nd Collegiate ed. 1991) as "a

fixed charge."

In John's Island Club, supra, the club argued that the rule

exceeded the Department's grant of rulemaking authority, and modified, enlarged, and contravened the law implemented. The court determined that additional paid in capital does not fall within the generally understood definition of "dues" or "fees" as applied to a club. The terms "dues" and "fees" are not defined by statute, and the statute does not specifically authorize an admissions tax on any type of paid in capital. In the absence of clearer legislative consideration of what was meant by the terms "capitalization fees" and "capital facility fees," the court concluded that the rule at issue was inconsistent with the provisions of chapter 212, F.S. Furthermore, the court emphasized that the absences of clear legislative intent inure to the benefit of the taxpayer and that the position of the Department is contrary to accepted principles of accounting from which common understanding of terms such as "capitalization" may be derived as clearly disclosed in the record of those proceedings. Accordingly, the order to invalidate rule 12A-1.005(5)(d)1.b., F.A.C. was affirmed by the District Court.

RESPONSE

The equity members in John's Island Club, supra, were assessed

for expenditures related to capital improvements. The assessments were made to pay off indebtedness created by the expenditures. Here, assessments were made against the equity members of a country club to pay off indebtedness incurred to

fund major capital improvements. The assessments did not

entitle the members to use the club's facilities, did not result

in a decrease in the club membership dues or fees, and they were not used to pay operating expenses. The assessments were made in a specific amount and were separately billed to the members. The capital assessments here are not "dues" and "fees" and are

not subject to the tax.

This response constitutes a Technical Assistance Advisement under Section 213.22, F.S., which is binding on the Department only under the facts and circumstances described in the request for this advice as specified in Section 213.22, F.S. Our

response is predicated on those facts and the specific situation summarized above. You are advised that subsequent statutory or administrative rule changes, or judicial interpretations of the statutes or rules, upon which this advice is based, may subject similar future transactions to a different treatment than

expressed in this response.

You are further advised that this response and your request are public records under Chapter 119, F.S., which are subject to disclosure to the public under the conditions of Section 213.22, F.S. Your name, address, and any other details which might lead to identification of the taxpayer must be deleted by the Department before disclosure. In an effort to protect the confidentiality of such information, we request you notify the undersigned in writing within 15 days of any deletions you

wishes made to the request or response.

Sincerely,

Charles Wallace

Senior Tax Specialist

Technical Assistance and Dispute Resolution

CW!
ctrl# 34129

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1998. Ezel checks current Florida tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace