Was Florida sales tax computed before or after a supermarket's loyalty-card discount funded partly by supplier allowances?

Short answer Tax applied after the loyalty-card discount. The supermarket controlled its supplier allowances and they were not reimbursements tied to specific current customer purchases, so the card reduction operated like a store coupon. If a supplier later reimbursed discounts sale by sale, tax would instead apply to the price before discount.
State
FL
Ruling
TAA 98A-057
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1998-07-16
Issued by
Florida Department of Revenue
Requested by
A redacted supermarket chain operating in Florida and other states

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1998. Ask about yours and see what current Florida tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1998
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This Florida Technical Assistance Advisement applied 1998 sales-tax rules to one redacted supermarket's loyalty-card discounts and supplier allowances. Under section 213.22, it binds the Department only for that requester and those facts. How allowances are calculated, whether reimbursement is tied to specific sales, customer payment, coupon terms, retailer discretion, transaction records, and later law can change the tax base.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Subject

MVP Card Program

Plain-English summary

The supermarket computed Florida sales tax on the shelf price after subtracting the loyalty-card discount. The card reduction was a dealer discount similar to a store coupon, not a manufacturer coupon reimbursed for a specific customer purchase.

Suppliers paid promotional and purchase allowances using prior-year purchases, negotiated amounts, market share, and other factors. The supermarket could use those funds for card discounts, advertising, other promotions, cost-of-goods adjustments, or simply increased margin. Presenting the card on a particular sale did not change the amount any supplier paid.

Because there was no direct link between a supplier payment and an individual discounted purchase, the customer's reduced amount was the retailer's sales price at the moment of sale. The Department warned that if the program changed so a supplier reimbursed the supermarket for specific discounted product sales, the arrangement would resemble a manufacturer coupon and tax would apply before the discount.

What this means for you

The funding source alone does not decide the coupon tax base. Retailers should document whether supplier money is discretionary promotional support or a reimbursement earned from identified customer redemptions of a specific product offer.

Common questions

Q: Did the supermarket's receipt of supplier allowances make every card discount a manufacturer coupon? No. The allowances were not tied to current individual sales and the supermarket controlled their use.

Q: What amount was taxable under the described program? The retail price after the card discount.

Q: When would tax apply to the price before discount? If supplier reimbursement became directly connected to specific product sales involving the customer's coupon or similar device.

Citations and references

  • Fla. Stat. §§ 212.02(16), 212.05(1)(a), 212.06(1)(a) — sales price and tax measured at retail sale
  • Fla. Admin. Code r. 12A-1.018(1), (3)-(4) — manufacturer coupons versus dealer discounts
  • Gaulden v. Kirk, 47 So. 2d 567 (Fla. 1950)
  • Fla. Stat. § 213.22 — Technical Assistance Advisements

Source

Original ruling text

SUMMARY

The Taxpayer owns and operates numerous supermarkets in Florida. The Taxpayer developed a "Card" program which entitled customers using the Taxpayer's "Card" program to a discount on selected products. The Taxpayer received supplier allowances on selected products, but such allowances were not tied to current year sales of a specific product. This TAA determined that the Taxpayer should compute the tax for an item on the retail price less the "Card" discount, similar to a store coupon.


Jul 16, 1998

Re: Technical Assistance Advisement 98A-057 Sales and Use Tax - MVP Card Program Petitioner: XXX (herein "Taxpayer") FEI: XX Sections: 212.02(16), 212.05, 212.06, F.S. Rule:

12A-1.018, F.A.C.

Dear :

This letter is a response to your petition dated May 22, 1998, for the Department's issuance of a Technical Assistance Advisement ("TAA") concerning the above referenced party and matter. Your petition has been carefully examined and the Department finds it to be in compliance with the requisite criteria set forth in Chapter 12-11, F.A.C. This response to your request constitutes a TAA and is issued to you under the authority of s. 213.22, F.S.

DISCUSSION OF FACTS

In your letter, you presented the following for review and advisement thereon:

Taxpayer owns and operates numerous supermarkets in Florida

and other southeastern and mid-Atlantic states. Through its supermarkets, Taxpayer sells at retail a wide variety of food and other grocery items, as well as other products.

Taxpayer negotiates with, and receives promotional and purchase allowances from, product distributors, promoters, manufacturers and other suppliers (collectively "Suppliers"). Some Suppliers award allowances to Taxpayer using an allocation method typically based on Taxpayer's purchases from Suppliers during the previous year (usually on a per case accrual rate). Other Suppliers award specific allowance amounts to Taxpayer, the amounts of which are determined through negotiations between Taxpayer and Suppliers and by such other factors as the market share of the applicable product(s).

The allowances earned by the Taxpayer from a Supplier can be used by the Taxpayer to reduce the selling price of that Supplier's products and/or to advertise or otherwise promote the Supplier's products. In some instances, the Taxpayer may retain the amount of the allowances as a price adjustment for its cost of goods sold. All allowances are paid by the Suppliers directly to the Taxpayer. All allowances are negotiated and/or determined during the product procurement process. While the allowances are earned in the manner described above, Suppliers and Taxpayer typically agree to have the Suppliers release the funds to Taxpayer at the time of promotional activity.

Taxpayer develops marketing strategies using the aforementioned allowances to increase certain product sales, to promote sales within specific market areas, and to promote customer loyalty. One marketing strategy is retailer price reductions. Retailer price reductions can be targeted to all customers or to a select group of customers. Retailer price reductions directed to all customers are delivered through reduced shelf prices of items sold, while retailer price reductions directed to a select group of customers are now delivered by Taxpayer primarily through its "Card" program.

The "Card" program was developed and implemented by Taxpayer to direct additional shelf price reductions to a select group of customers and to promote customer loyalty. Under this program, Taxpayer issues encoded electronicallyreadable cards ("Cards") to all of its existing customers and continues to offer Cards to any customer who requests one. Each Card, which is similar in appearance and function to a bank automatic teller card, carries unique information which enables Taxpayer to identify the customer to whom the Card was issued and to collect data related to the customer's buying habits. The information gathered is used for various marketing purposes.

When a customer purchases goods at one of Taxpayer's supermarkets, he or she may present the Card to the cashier for purposes of identifying his or her enrollment in Taxpayer's Card Program. Taxpayer discounts the price of selected products to customers presenting Cards in an effort to promote customer loyalty.

While Supplier allowances provide funds that Taxpayer uses to pass additional cost savings to certain of its customers through the Card program, the use of the Card by Taxpayer's customers does not affect the amount of allowances any Supplier pays the Taxpayer. As described above, Taxpayer has wide discretion in determining the manner in which the funds it receives from Suppliers are utilized, including whether to use such funds in promotional programs, such as the "Card" program, designed to increase gross sales, or, in some instances, simply keeping the allowances for itself and applying those funds towards its "bottom line" and, thereby, increasing its margins for goods sold.

Requested Advisement

Are the above described price reductions through the Taxpayer's "Card" program similar to the use of manufacturer coupons where tax is due on the full sales price of the item before any reduction is taken for the coupon or are they similar to store coupons in which tax is due on the price of the item after discount has been taken?

Discussion of Law

Section 212.02(16), F.S., defines "sales price" as follows:

(16) "Sales price" means the total amount paid for tangible personal property, including any services that are a part of the sale, valued in money, whether paid in money or otherwise, and includes any amount for which credit is given to the purchaser by the seller, without any deduction therefrom on account of the cost of the property sold, the cost of materials used, labor or service cost, interest charged, losses, or any other expense whatsoever.... (Emphasis supplied.)

Section 212.05, F.S., provides in pertinent part:

It is hereby declared to be the legislative intent that every person is exercising a taxable privilege who engages in the business of selling tangible personal property at retail in this state .... (1) For the exercise of such privilege, a tax is levied on each taxable transaction or incident, which tax is due and payable as follows: (a) 1.a. At the rate of 6 percent of the sales price of each item or article of tangible personal property when sold at retail in this state, computed on each taxable sale for the purpose of remitting the amount of tax due the state, and including each and every retail sale.... (2) The tax shall be collected by the dealer, as defined herein, and remitted by the dealer to the state at the time and in the manner as hereinafter provided.
...

Section 212.06(1)(a), F.S., provides:

(1)(a) The aforesaid tax at the rate of 6 percent of the retail sales price as of the moment of sale, 6 percent of the cost price as of the moment of purchase, or 6 percent

of the cost price as of the moment of commingling with the general mass of property in this state, as the case may be, shall be collectible from all dealers as herein defined on the sale at retail, the use, the consumption, the distribution, and the storage for use or consumption in this state of tangible personal property or services taxable under this chapter. The full amount of the tax on a credit sale, installment sale, or sale made on any kind of deferred payment plan shall be due at the moment of the transaction in the same manner as on a cash sale. (Emphasis supplied.)

Rule 12A-1.018, F.A.C., provides in part:

(1) The tax is imposed upon the total selling price of tangible personal property sold at retail.... (3) A coupon or refund issued directly by the manufacturer is not to be construed as a reduction in selling price by the dealer. In this case,... the full selling price of the product is taxable. (4) A dealer's discount is a reduction in selling price if taken at the moment of sale or purchase of a product....

Sales tax is not imposed on the value of the tangible personal property being sold, but rather, sales tax is levied on the "sales price." The Florida Supreme Court, in Gaulden v. Kirk, 47 So.2d 567 (Fla. 1950), rehearing denied July 31, 1950, speaking to this issue, specifically stated that:

... [T]he amount of tax to be paid is measured by the compensation received for the merchandise sold or services rendered.... Although the tax is determined upon the price charged for the merchandise or services, it is not a tax upon the personal property or services, but upon the privilege of selling the same, and is measured by the extent to which the privilege is enjoyed. Id. at 574.

Thus, as provided in s. 212.05, F.S., and as stated in Gaulden, it is the dealer who exercises, or enjoys, the taxable privilege of engaging in the business of making retail sales; it

is the dealer who has the obligation of charging, collecting and remitting the sales tax; and, it is the compensation received by the dealer selling the tangible personal property that becomes the taxable base, upon which sales tax must be levied.

ANALYSIS

Resolution of the stated issue requires, among other things, an analysis of the correlation between the Card program, and the Taxpayer's receipt and use of Suppliers allowances.

The facts, as represented to the Department, indicate that the Taxpayer obtains its Supplier allowance based on various factors, such as an allocation formula based on previous years sales, or simply due to arms length negotiation, which may include both objective and subjective factors. In any event, the amount and the receipt of a Supplier allowance is not tied to current year sales of a specific product. We deem any discounts granted to a customer at retail by virtue of the use of the "Card" as a current reduction in sales price, by Taxpayer, taken at the moment of sale, and not "...a coupon or refund issued directly by the manufacturer...."

Because Taxpayer has the discretion as to how to use the Supplier allowances, including but not limited to applying them to product discounts through its "Card" program, paying for related advertising or keeping the allowances to increase its "bottom line," it appears that the Supplier allowances are not similar to "manufacturers' coupons," where the vendor is reimbursed by the supplier for specific product sales based upon the number of coupons presented. Whereas in the typical "manufacturer's coupon" situation, the amount paid to a retailer is directly related to a specific purchase of the manufacturer's product by customers who present coupons, here, there appears to be no connection between the allowances received by Taxpayer and any individual sale of that manufacturer's product to a customer.

Therefore, specifically as to the "Card" program described above, Taxpayer should compute the tax for an item on the retail price less the "Card" discount, similar to a store coupon.

However, if there are changes to the "Card" program such that it involves reimbursement to Taxpayer by a supplier for specific product sales to customers involving use of a coupon or other device, the transactions would be akin to the use of "manufacturers' coupons" and tax should then be computed on the gross selling price before discount.

This response constitutes a Technical Assistance Advisement under s. 213.22, F.S., which is binding on the department only under the facts and circumstances described in the request for this advice, as specified in s. 213.22, F.S. Our response is predicated upon those facts and the specific situation summarized above. You are advised that subsequent statutory or administrative rule changes or judicial interpretations of the statutes or rules upon which this advice is based may subject similar future transactions to a different treatment from that which is expressed in this response.

You are further advised that this response and your request are public records under Chapter 119, F.S., which are subject to disclosure to the public under the conditions of s. 213.22, F.S. Your name, address, and any other details that might lead to identification of the taxpayer must be deleted by the Department before disclosure. In an effort to protect the confidentiality of such information, we request you notify the undersigned in writing within 15 days of any deletions you wish made to the request or this response.

Sincerely,

Leigh L. Ceci
Tax Law Specialist

Enclosure
Control #34317

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1998. Ezel checks current Florida tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace