Did a condominium master association owe Florida sales tax when it passed guard payroll costs to separate member associations?

Short answer Yes. The master association was the guards' sole legal employer, while each condominium association was a separate entity receiving taxable security services. Passing through actual payroll and expenses without markup did not create an employee-services exemption, and tax applied whether the charge was separate or bundled.
State
FL
Ruling
TAA 98A-046
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1998-06-26
Issued by
Florida Department of Revenue
Requested by
A redacted condominium master association proposing to employ guards and allocate their costs to member associations

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1998. Ask about yours and see what current Florida tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1998
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This Florida Technical Assistance Advisement applied 1998 sales-tax law to one condominium master association's guard employees and charges to legally separate condominium associations. Under section 213.22, it binds the Department only for that requester and those facts. Different employing entities, control, association structure, charges, service packages, or later law could change the result.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Subject

Security Service Charges Passed Through to Condominium Associations

Plain-English summary

A condominium master association had to collect Florida sales tax when it allocated security-guard payroll and related expenses to separate condominium associations. The result did not change because the master association passed through only its actual cost, added no markup, or described the guards as employees shared by all associations.

The master association paid the guards, controlled their work, withheld income taxes, and paid FICA and unemployment contributions. Those facts made the guards employees of the master association. The individual condominium associations had separate legal identities and federal identification numbers, so the guards were not providing exempt employee services to their own employer when they protected those associations.

Florida specifically treated guard and other protection services charged by condominium or community associations as taxable. The tax applied whether the master association separately itemized the security charge or included it within a package of services.

What this means for you

Passing through payroll at cost does not erase the taxable character of security services supplied to another legal entity. The employee exemption follows the actual employer-employee relationship, not common board members, related association status, or the absence of profit.

Bundling is also not a workaround under the rule applied here. A package charge remained taxable when the agreement included security services.

Common questions

Q: Did the lack of markup make the reimbursement nontaxable? No. The Department taxed the security service charge even though the master association passed through actual payroll and expenses without profit.

Q: Were the guards employees of every condominium association? No. Only the master association compensated and controlled them and handled the employment taxes.

Q: Would separately invoicing the security charge change the result? No. Tax applied both to separately stated security charges and to charges included in a service package.

Q: What if an outside management company supplied the guards? The ruling said third-party security personnel charges were also taxable.

Citations and references

  • Fla. Stat. § 212.05(1)(j)1.a. — sales tax on detective, burglar-protection, and other protection services
  • Fla. Admin. Code r. 12A-1.0092 — taxable guard and security services, including charges by condominium and community associations
  • Fla. Admin. Code r. 12A-1.0161 — taxable services and the employee-to-employer exemption
  • Fla. Stat. § 213.22 — Technical Assistance Advisements

Source

Original ruling text

SUMMARY

Security service charges passed through to individual condominium associations by a condominium master association are subject to sales and use tax whether invoiced separately, or included as part of a package of services.


Jun 26, 1998

Re: TAA 98(A)-046
Sales and Use Tax
Security Service Charges Passed Through to Condominium Associations Section 212.05(1)(j), Florida Statutes Rules 12A-1.0092, 12A-1.0161, Florida Administrative Code XXX (hereinafter Taxpayer) XXX (hereinafter Community) Taxpayer I.D. #XXX

Dear :

This is a response to your petition dated XXX, for the Department's issuance of a Technical Assistance Advisement ("TAA") concerning the above referenced matter. Your petition has been carefully examined and the Department finds it to be in compliance with the requisite criteria set forth in Chapter 1211, F.A.C. This response to your request constitutes a TAA and is issued to you under the authority of s. 213.22, F.S.

STATED FACTS

This letter responds to your XXX letter, which presented your request for guidance on the applicability of our State's sales tax on pass-through of security personnel payroll and other expenses by a condominium master association to various individual condominium associations under facts and circumstances you have described, as follows:

[Community] is a condominium community located in XXX. Security services have previously been provided to the various condominium associations of [Taxpayer] by a management company. The security personnel were employed by the management company, a third party. Therefore, the charges for services they provided to the individual condominium associations were subject to sales tax. The Master Condominium Association, [Taxpayer], is now proposing to employ the security personnel. The payroll and other expenses will be allocated to the various buildings based upon the number of man-hours expended at each building. The pass-through of costs will be the actual expenses, with no mark-up to the Master Association.

... [T]he security employees hired by [Taxpayer] will be considered to be the employees of all of the individual condominium associations. [Taxpayer] will be legal employer of the security personnel, withholding all appropriate income taxes and paying F.I.C.A. and unemployment insurance contributions on behalf of these individuals.

No mark-up or profit will inure to [Taxpayer] for the security personnel payroll and other expenses passed through to the individual condominium associations.

You further have advised during a subsequent telephone conversation that the employees hired by [Taxpayer] will be at the direction and discretion of [Taxpayer]. Additionally, you indicated that [Taxpayer] and the individual condominium association are separate legal entities and each have different federal identification numbers.

You have presented the following question:

Based on the above facts and circumstances, will the taxpayer be required to collect sales tax on its passthrough of security personnel payroll and other expenses to the various individual condominium associations?

LAW AND ANALYSIS

Section 212.05, F.S. (1997), provides in part:

Sales, storage, use tax.

It is hereby declared to be the legislative intent that every person is exercising a taxable privilege who engages in the business of selling tangible personal property at retail in this state, including the business of making mail order sales, or who rents or furnishes any of the things or services taxable under this chapter, or who stores for use or consumption in this state any item or article of tangible personal property as defined herein and who leases or rents such property within the state.

(1) For the exercise of such privilege, a tax is levied on each taxable transaction or incident, which tax is due and payable as follows:

(j)1. At the rate of 6 percent on charges for all:

a. Detective, burglar protection, and other protection services (SIC Industry Numbers 7381 and 7382)....

Rule 12A-1.0092, F.A.C., provides in part:

(1) Persons who provide any of the services enumerated in Industry Numbers 7381 and 7382 of the Standard Industrial Classification Manual, 1987, are dealers in a taxable service and are required to charge sales tax on the total taxable sales price of the service.

(2)(a) Detective, burglar protection, and other protection services are those services which are rendered to minimize or prevent loss or damage to life, limb, or property and are of a kind typically performed by security or alarm system companies, or are those investigative services which are rendered to obtain evidence or other information for legal, business, employment, or personal purposes of a kind typically performed by detective or investigative agencies.

These taxable services include:

  1. Armored car service;
  2. Burglar or fire alarm or other security system devices
    monitoring and maintenance;

a. The installation of alarm or security systems that remain tangible personal property is governed by the provisions of Rule 12A-1.016, F.A.C.

b. The installation of alarm or security systems that become a part of real property is governed by the provisions of Rule 12A-1.051, F.A.C.

c. The monitoring or maintenance of alarm or security systems is a taxable service for systems that are considered to be either tangible personal property or a part of real property. The term maintenance includes any inspection of an alarm or security system to confirm its proper working order. The term maintenance does not include the expansion or upgrade of an existing system, but does include the replacement of defective components.

  1. Detective agency services;
  2. Dogs, rental of for protective services;
  3. Fingerprint service;
  4. Guard service;
  5. Investigators, private;
  6. Lie detector or polygraph services;
  7. Passenger screening services;
  8. Protective service, guard; and
  9. Security guard service

(b) The services in paragraph (a) above are taxable for all persons, businesses, residences, or nonresidential properties.


(d) Security Services Provided to Housing Facilities.

  1. Security services, such as vehicle or foot patrols;
    gate, lobby, or entrance guard service; or personnel which

may be dispatched from any other site upon request, are taxable. The following businesses or persons who charge for these services must also charge, collect, and remit tax on those services.

a. Developers, owners, or lessors of residential developments who charge property owners or residents of such developments.

b. Homeowner's, condominium, cooperative, or community associations who charge their members.

c. Operators of apartments, roominghouses, hotels, motels, and mobile home parks who charge the residents or guests of such facilities.

  1. A charge for the transactions enumerated in subparagraph
  2. is considered to be made when:

a. A charge for security services is expressly noted on an invoice given to the purchaser; or

b. A charge is made for a package of services which, by agreement, includes security services. See Rule 12A1.0161(7)(a), F.A.C.

(e) The services in this rule are not taxable when provided by employees to their employers. See Rule 12A-1.0161(3), F.A.C.

Rule 12A-1.0161, F.A.C., provides in part:

Sales and Use Tax on Services; Sale for Resale.

(1)(a) A tax is imposed on the sale at retail or use in this state of... detective, burglar protection, and other protection services described in Rule 12A-1.0092, F.A.C. The tax is imposed at the rate of 6 percent of the total sales price or cost price of such service. The tax shall be computed on each taxable sale or use of a service for the purpose of remitting the amount of tax due the state,

and shall include each and every such retail sale or use of a service....

(b) For the purposes of this rule, a service shall mean those services enumerated in paragraph (a) above....

(3) Services by employees to their employers are exempt.

(a) In determining whether a person is an employee, the Department will consider the following indicia:

  1. Whether the person is paid a wage or salary;

  2. Whether the "employer" is required to withhold income
    tax from the person's wage or salary;

  3. Whether F.I.C.A. is required to be paid by the
    "employer"; or

  4. Whether the "employer" is required to make unemployment
    insurance contributions on behalf of the person.

(b)1. However, if all of the indicia mentioned above are present, the person is nevertheless not an employee if he is acting in the capacity of an independent contractor. A person may be an employee even if one or more of the indicia are not present and he is not acting as an independent contractor....

(c)1. A person who provides services for a company on a fee basis is not an employee of the company where the company exercises no direct control over the details of performance of that person's duties beyond general statements about the scope and nature of that person's obligations under the contract between that person and the company. In addition, where fees paid to that person are not subject to withholding taxes or social security taxes, that person is not considered an employee of the company. Therefore, that person's taxable services are subject to sales tax....

(d) Advisory services provided by corporate directors and

board members to their respective corporation(s) are exempt....

DETERMINATION

Based on the facts presented, Taxpayer has the option of hiring protection services from a third party or hiring its own employees to provide protection to the individual condominium associations. Security personnel employed by a third party management company would be subject to sales tax pursuant to s. 212.05(1)(j)1.a., F.S. With respect to the hiring by Taxpayer of its own employees to provide the security services to the various condominium associations, the facts supplied indicate that only the Taxpayer, and not any of these associations, has established a legal employer-employee relationship with such employees, as it compensates such employees, has full control over such employees, and is responsible for remitting all employment related taxes with respect to such employees. Under Chapter 718, F.S., each association is an entity whose shareholders or members are comprised of those individuals owning the condominiums represented by the particular association. These various associations are distinct entities from one another. The supplied facts indicate the Taxpayer and the various condominium associations are separate legal entities, though they may share some common board members. Thus, under the provided facts, the employees hired by Taxpayer do no appear to be employees of the individual condominium associations. As a consequence, such employees would not be rendering such security services to their employer, but rather to a variety of individual entities that have a relationship to their employer. There is no exemption for security services provided by individuals to entities that have a relationship to their employer. Therefore, based on s. 212.05(1)(j)1.a., F.S., and Rule 12A-1.0092(2)(d)1.b., F.A.C., Taxpayer must charge, collect, and remit sales tax on security services provided to the individual condominium associations, whether invoiced separately, or included as part of a package of services.

This response constitutes a Technical Assistance Advisement under s. 213.22, F.S., which is binding on the Department only under the facts and circumstances described in the request for

this advice as specified in s. 213.22, F.S. Our response is predicated on those facts and the specific situation summarized above. You are advised that subsequent statutory or administrative rule changes or judicial interpretations of the statutes or rules upon which this advice is based may subject similar future transactions to a different treatment than expressed in this response.

You are further advised that this response and your request are public records under Chapter 119, F.S., which are subject to disclosure to the public under the conditions of s. 213.22, F.S. Your name, address, and any other details which might lead to identification of the taxpayer must be deleted by the Department before disclosure. In an effort to protect confidential information, we request you notify the undersigned in writing within 15 days of any deletions you wish made to the request or this response.

If you have further questions with regard to this matter and wish to discuss them, you may contact Technical Assistance and Dispute Resolution, Department of Revenue, P.O. Box 7443, Tallahassee, Florida 32314-7443.

Sincerely,

Bruce H. Williams
Technical Assistance and Dispute
Resolution
(850) 488-2506

BHW/bw
Ctrl# 32093

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1998. Ezel checks current Florida tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace