FL TAA 98A-027 Sales and Use Tax 1998-04-21

Were points paid to buy down a mobile-home loan's interest rate included in the Florida taxable sales price?

Short answer: Yes. Although an earlier contract and disclosure separated the $2,019 interest-rate buydown from cash price, the buyers signed a later contract that included the points in the cash sales price and superseded every prior agreement. Because the final contract did not separately state the finance charge, tax applied and no refund was due.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1998. Ezel answers yours, under current Florida tax law, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1998
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This Florida Technical Assistance Advisement applied 1998 sales-tax law to one mobile-home purchase, a $2,019 interest-rate buydown, an earlier itemized contract, and a later signed contract that included the charge in cash price and superseded prior agreements. Under section 213.22, it binds the Department only for those buyers and facts. Final contract language, separate statement, transaction timing, financing structure, refund facts, or later law could change the result.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Subject

Mobile Home Purchase; Financing Charges

Plain-English summary

The $2,019 paid to reduce the mobile-home loan's interest rate to 7% was part of the taxable sales price because the final contract did not separately state it as a finance charge. The buyers therefore were not entitled to a sales-tax refund on the points.

An earlier sales contract and Truth-in-Lending disclosure had separately listed the mobile home's cash price and financing charges. Under that structure, Florida said only the cash selling price should have been taxed.

The buyers later signed a second sales contract. It folded the point buydown into cash sales price, stated that it contained the parties' entire understanding, and expressly superseded all other contracts. That later document controlled, making the full stated price taxable.

What this means for you

Finance charges are excluded from taxable price only when the operative sales agreement states the cash selling price and adds interest or carrying charges as separate, distinct items.

Earlier disclosures do not preserve the exclusion if a later signed contract combines the charge into price and supersedes prior documents. Review the final integrated agreement before calculating tax.

Common questions

Q: Are interest and finance charges always taxable on a retail installment sale? No. The rule excluded them when separately stated from the property's cash selling price.

Q: Why did the original contract not control? The later signed contract said it contained the entire agreement and superseded all others.

Q: Did labeling the payment as an interest-rate buydown help? Not in the final contract. The points were included in cash price rather than separately stated.

Q: Was a refund due? No. Tax was properly calculated from the final contract's combined selling price.

Citations and references

  • Fla. Stat. §§ 212.05, 212.06 — Florida sales and use tax
  • Fla. Admin. Code r. 12A-1.017 — interest and finance charges excluded only when separately stated
  • Fla. Admin. Code r. 12A-1.014 — refund rule cited in the advisement heading
  • Fla. Stat. § 213.22 — Technical Assistance Advisements

Source

Original ruling text

SUMMARY

The taxpayer signed a contract to purchase a mobile home.
The contract included a separate itemization of points to
buy down the interest rate. Tax was calculated on the
sales price excluding the points. The taxpayer
subsequently signed a second contract in which the sales
price included the points. The second contract also
included a statement that said it superseded all previous
oral or written contracts. Tax was correctly calculated on
the sales price including the points. The taxpayer is not
due a refund of tax paid on the points, because the points
were not separately stated from the sales price in the
contract.


Apr 21, 1998

Re: Technical Assistance Advisement 98A-027
Sales and Use Tax - Mobile Home Purchase; Financing Charges
Sections: 212.05, 212.06, F.S.
Rules: 12A-1.014, and 12A-1.017, F.A.C.
Petitioner: XXX (herein "Taxpayer")
SSN: XXX and XXX

Dear :

This letter is a response to your petition dated January 19,
1998, for the Department's issuance of a Technical Assistance
Advisement ("TAA") concerning the above referenced party and
matter. Your petition has been carefully examined and the
Department finds it to be in compliance with the requisite
criteria set forth in Chapter 12-11, F.A.C. This response to
your request constitutes a TAA and is issued to you under the
authority of s. 213.22, F.S.

DISCUSSION OF FACTS

In your letter you state that you recently bought a mobile home

from a Florida dealer. This purchase is being financed through
a second company. Under the loan agreement, you paid the finance
company $2,019.00 in order to buy the interest rate on the loan
down to 7%. You were charged sales tax on this additional
amount, as well as on the listed cash sales price of the mobile
home.

REQUESTED ADVISEMENT

You ask if sales tax was due on the additional amount paid to
buy down the interest rate on the loan.

Discussion, Analysis, and Conclusion of Law

Rule 12A-1.017, Florida Administrative Code, states that:

The amount paid by any purchaser as interest or as a
finance charge is taxable unless such interest or finance
charge is separately stated from the consideration received
for the tangible personal property transferred in a retail
sale. For example, where articles are sold in a taxable
transaction under an installment payment arrangement,
retail title contract or purchase money mortgage for a
stated amount payable in installments at intervals over a
period of time, the entire amount is taxable. If, on the
other hand, a cash selling price is stated and interest and
carrying charges are added thereto as separate and distinct
items, only the cash selling price is taxable.

You have provided both the original sales contract between you
and the mobile home dealer, dated April 12, 1997, and a copy of
the Federal Truth-in-Lending Act disclosure form. Each of these
documents separately lists a cash sales price for the mobile
home, which is separate from any finance charges. As such,
sales tax should have been collected only on this cash sales
price.

You have also provided a second sales contract between you and
the mobile home dealer, dated May 9, 1997. On this contract,
finance charges are not separately stated, but are included as
part of the cash sales price. This contract, which is signed by

the taxpayers, states that "This agreement contains the entire
understanding between you [the seller] and me [the buyer] and no
other representation or inducement, verbal or written, has been
made which is not contained in the contract." Additionally,
this contract states "This contract supercedes all others."

In the second contract, the point buy down was added to the
actual final cash price, and not separately stated. Pursuant to
Rule 12A-1.017, F.A.C., the point buy down, which is a charge
for interest, must be separately stated to be excluded from the
taxable selling price. The second contract specifically states
that it supercedes all other contracts, and was accepted by the
taxpayers, as evidenced by their signatures on the contract. In
this second contract, tax was properly calculated on the selling
price of the unit, even though the point buy down was included
as part of the selling price. Therefore, because the finance
charges are not separately stated, and in light of the limiting
language contained in the contract, no refund of tax is due to
the taxpayer.

This response constitutes a Technical Assistance Advisement
under Section 213.22, F.S., which is binding on the department
only under the facts and circumstances described in the request
for this advice, as specified in Section 213.22, F.S. Our
response is predicated upon those facts and the specific
situation summarized above. You are advised that subsequent
statutory or administrative rule changes or judicial
interpretations of the statutes or rules upon which this advice
is based may subject similar future transactions to a different
treatment from that which is expressed in this response.

You are further advised that this response and your request are
public records under Chapter 119, F.S., which are subject to
disclosure to the public under the conditions of Section 213.22,
F.S. Your name, address, and any other details that might lead
to identification of the taxpayer must be deleted by the
Department before disclosure. In an effort to protect the
confidentiality of such information, we request you notify the
undersigned in writing within 15 days of any deletions you wish
made to the request or this response.

Sincerely,

Sara D. Faulkenberry
Tax Law Specialist
Technical Assistance and Dispute Resolution
850-414-9838
[email protected]

Control No. 32639

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 1998 ruling on this question. Ezel checks current Florida tax law and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.