FL TAA 97C2-005 Intangible Personal Property Tax 1997-08-21

How should restricted company stock be valued for Florida intangible-tax purposes after a put option expired but a right of first refusal remained?

Short answer: The stock had to be valued using the factors customarily considered in determining fair market value. The ruling did not approve a specific formula, price, or discount.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1997. Ezel answers yours, under current Florida tax law, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1997
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This 1997 Florida Technical Assistance Advisement addressed company stock subject to a purchase agreement, an expired put option, and a right of first refusal requiring an open-market offer to be no more favorable than the insider offer. Under section 213.22, it binds the Department only for those facts and law. Different restrictions, option terms, marketability, valuation evidence, tax year, exemptions, or later law could change the result.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The stock was to be valued using the factors customarily considered in determining fair market value. The Department did not select a particular formula, accept a stated agreement price, or authorize a specific discount.

The stock purchase agreement had originally included a put option, but that option expired on the third anniversary of the acquisition. The investor could sell on the open market after first giving the named shareholder or officer a right of first refusal on terms at least as favorable.

What this means for you

Transfer restrictions are part of the facts, but this ruling does not say that a right of first refusal automatically produces any particular valuation reduction. A taxpayer still needs a supportable fair-market-value analysis using customary valuation factors.

Common questions

Q: Did the Department use the expired put-option price? No specific use of that price was approved.

Q: Did the right of first refusal set the stock's taxable value? No. The ruling gave only the general fair-market-value standard.

Q: Did Florida approve a marketability or minority discount? No. The advisement did not decide any particular discount.

Q: What was the actual holding? Determine value from the factors customarily used to establish fair market value.

Citations and references

  • Fla. Stat. § 199.103(7) — valuation using factors customarily considered in determining fair market value
  • Fla. Stat. § 213.22 — Technical Assistance Advisements

Source

Original ruling text

Aug 21, 1997

Re: Technical Assistance Advisement No. 97(C)2-005
Intangible Tax - Stock Valuation
s. 199.103, F.S.
XXX (hereinafter Investor)
XXX (hereinafter Shareholder/Officer)
XXX (hereinafter Company Stock)

Dear :

Your letter requesting a Technical Assistance Advisement
has been referred to this office for response. The specific
scenario for which advice has been requested is summarized
below.

Statement of the Facts

Particular company stock was purchased subject to terms and
restrictions of the stock purchase agreement. The agreement
provided for the initial shares to be sold based on the Put
Option. The Put Option expired the third anniversary after the
acquisition date of the initial shares. The agreement does not
restrict the sale of the stock on the open market providing the
investor offers the individual named in the agreement, first
right of refusal. The offer on the open market can not be more
favorable than offered in the first right of refusal.

Provision of the Law

Pursuant to s. 199.103(7), F.S., the valuation would be
determined on the basis of those factors customarily considered
for determining the fair market value.

Conclusion

Based on the facts and circumstances, the valuation for the
stock in question would be determined on the basis of those
factors customarily considered for determining the fair market

value.

This response constitutes a Technical Assistance Advisement
under s. 213.22, F.S., which is binding on the Department only
under the facts and circumstances described in the request for
this advice as specified in s. 213.22, F.S. Our response is
predicated on those facts and the specific situation summarized
above. You are advised that subsequent statutory or
administrative rule changes or judicial interpretations of the
statutes or rules upon which this advice is based may subject
similar future transactions to a different treatment than
expressed in this response.

You are further advised that this response and your request
are public records under Chapter 119, F.S., which are subject to
disclosure to the public under the conditions of s. 213.22, F.S.
Your name, address, and any other details which might lead to
identification of the taxpayer must be deleted by the Department
before disclosure. In an effort to protect the confidentiality
of such information, we request you notify the undersigned in
writing within 15 days of any deletions you wish made to the
request or the response.

Sincerely,

Celestine Grantham
Senior Tax Specialist
Technical Tax Policy and Dispute Resolution
Office of General Counsel

CG/mh

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 1997 ruling on this question. Ezel checks current Florida tax law and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.