How did Florida's $5,000 discretionary-surtax limit apply to a combined direct-mail coupon campaign?
Apply this to your situation
This page answers the general question as of 1997. Ask about yours and see what current Florida tax law says, with citations.
Subject
Discretionary Surtax on a Combined Coupon Mailing
Plain-English summary
All coupons included in one combined mailing and billed on one invoice counted as one item for Florida's $5,000 discretionary-surtax limit. The franchisee—not the coupon recipients—was the ultimate consumer of the advertising pieces.
The franchisor designed, produced, and distributed coupons for multiple businesses. Those coupons were inserted into a single envelope, and the franchisor billed the franchisee for the complete mailing. Because the pieces were sold together in bulk and supported by one invoice, the surtax limit applied to the total invoice for that mailing.
Thus, the discretionary surtax applied to the first $5,000 of the combined mailing's total charge, rather than restarting for every advertiser's coupon.
What this means for you
For the surtax cap, transaction structure mattered. Multiple printed pieces could be one item when normally sold in bulk to one purchaser at one time and documented as one sale.
Separate campaigns or invoices could present different facts. This ruling did not analyze destination sourcing or whether out-of-state deliveries were taxable.
Common questions
Q: Were direct-mail advertising pieces taxable property? Yes. The cited rule treated their final sale to the ultimate consumer as taxable.
Q: Who was the ultimate consumer? The franchisee that bought and used the coupons to deliver advertising.
Q: Did every coupon have its own $5,000 surtax limit? No. All coupons in the combined envelope and invoice were one item for the limit.
Q: What amount formed the surtax base? The total amount invoiced for the particular mailing, with the $5,000 limitation applied to that total.
Q: Did the ruling decide tax based on where recipients lived? No. Its requested issue was the discretionary-surtax item limitation.
Citations and references
- Fla. Stat. § 212.054(2)(b)1 — discretionary-surtax $5,000 item limitation
- Fla. Admin. Code r. 12A-1.034(1), (2) — direct-mail advertising pieces
- Fla. Stat. § 213.22 — Technical Assistance Advisements
Source
- Landing page: Florida Tax Law Library
- Advisement: TAA 97A-085
Original ruling text
Dec 04, 1997
Re: Technical Assistance Advisement 97A-085 Sales & Use Tax - Direct Mail Advertising Section: 212.054, F.S. Rule: 12A-1.034(1) and (2), F.A.C. Petitioner: XXX ("Franchisor") FEI: XX
Dear :
This is a response to your petition received September 15, 1997 for the Department's issuance of a Technical Assistance Advisement ("TAA") concerning the above referenced party and matter. Your petition has been carefully examined and the Department finds it to be in compliance with the requisite criteria set forth in Chapter 12-11, F.A.C. This response to your request constitutes a TAA and is issued to you under the authority of s. 213.22, F.S.
DISCUSSION OF FACTS
Your company, Franchisor, is a franchisor that distributes direct mail advertising materials for franchisees located in Florida. Franchisor designs, produces and distributes the advertising materials throughout Florida and the United States. The mailed materials consist of advertising coupons for various businesses. The coupons of the various businesses are inserted into a single envelope and mailed to selected Florida residents. The franchisee sells the ad and the franchisor produces and distributes the coupons. The franchisor bills the franchisee for a mailing which will include numerous coupons. A sample invoice was provided which itemizes all charges for a particular mailing. The total for the invoice provided was $221,709.30.
REQUESTED ADVISEMENT
You request a determination concerning the application of the
$5,000 limitation for the discretionary sales surtax provided in
Section 212.054, F.S., with regard to Franchisor's sales to franchisee.
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF LAW
Rule 12A-1.034(1) and (2), F.A.C., provides in full:
(1) Upon final sales to ultimate consumers of direct mail advertising pieces, circulars, hand-outs, throw-aways and similar advertising matter, the dealer shall collect the sales tax upon the selling price thereof from his purchaser.
(2) Advertising pieces, circulars, hand-outs and similar advertising matter are taxable.
In this case the ultimate consumer of the coupons is the franchisee. The franchisee is selling the advertising and using the coupons as the vehicle to provide such advertising. The mailouts are billed to the franchisee inclusive of all coupons for a particular mailout. As all of the coupons for the various customers of the franchisee are included in one envelope and the billing for such mailout is directly mailed to the franchisee, such mailouts constitute a single transaction for the purpose of Section 212.054, F.S., which provides in Subparagraph (2)(b)1., in pertinent part, the following:
... For purposes of administering the $5,000 limitation on an item of tangible personal property, if two or more taxable items of tangible personal property are sold to the same purchaser at the same time and, under generally accepted business practice or industry standards or usage, are normally sold in bulk or are items that, when assembled, comprise a working unit or part of a working unit, such items must be considered a single item for purposes of the $5,000 limitation when supported by a charge ticket, sales slip, invoice, or other tangible evidence of a single sale or rental....
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
We find that such total amounts found on invoices provided to the franchisee constitute the tax base for which calculation of the discretionary surtax should be calculated. The $5,000 limitation would apply to the total invoiced for a particular mailing.
This response constitutes a Technical Assistance Advisement under s. 213.22, F.S., which is binding on the department only under the facts and circumstances described in the request for this advice, as specified in s. 213.22, F.S. Our response is predicated upon those facts and the specific situation summarized above. You are advised that subsequent statutory or administrative rule changes or judicial interpretations of the statutes or rules upon which this advice is based may subject similar future transactions to a different treatment from that which is expressed in this response.
You are further advised that this response and your request are public records under Chapter 119, F.S., which are subject to disclosure to the public under the conditions of s. 213.22, F.S. Your name, address, and any other details that might lead to identification of the taxpayer must be deleted by the Department before disclosure. In an effort to protect the confidentiality of such information, we request you notify the undersigned in writing within 15 days of any deletions you wish made to the request or this response.
Should you have any further questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely,
R. Clay Brower
Tax Law Specialist
Technical Assistance & Dispute Resolution
RCB/
Control #: 30907
What does the law say today, for your facts?
This ruling is from 1997. Ezel checks current Florida tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace