FL TAA 96C2-129 Intangible Personal Property Tax 1996-12-09

Were securities held by an out-of-state investment partnership, or its Florida residents' general-partnership interests, subject to Florida intangible tax?

Short answer: No. The partnership's securities lacked Florida taxable situs because its operations, meetings, accounts, banks, and brokerage management were outside Florida. The Florida residents' general-partnership interests were also exempt under section 199.185(1)(c).

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1996. Ezel answers yours, under current Florida tax law, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1996
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is an official Technical Assistance Advisement of the Florida Department of Revenue, issued to a requester under section 213.22, Florida Statutes, on the facts and circumstances described in the request. The advisement's standard closing states that it binds the Department only under those facts and circumstances and that later statutory or administrative-rule changes or judicial interpretations may produce a different result. Identifying details may be redacted. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice. Consult a licensed Florida tax professional about your specific facts.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Florida concluded that neither the investment securities nor the two Florida residents' general-partnership interests were subject to the annual intangible tax.

The residents had formed an out-of-state partnership to invest in marketable securities and similar assets. All partnership operations and quarterly meetings occurred outside Florida, and outside brokerage firms and banks managed the investment accounts. The Department therefore found that the securities lacked Florida taxable situs.

The partners' ownership interests were separately exempt. Section 199.185(1)(c) exempted a general or limited partnership interest, except for an interest as a limited partner in a limited partnership registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The entity here was not SEC-registered, and the taxpayers held general-partnership interests.

What this means for you

Florida residents investing through partnerships

The ruling analyzed the partnership's assets separately from the partners' ownership interests. The securities result depended on the partnership's operations and management remaining outside Florida; the ownership-interest result depended on the statutory partnership exemption.

Partnership managers and investment advisers

Document where meetings, banking, brokerage management, and other operations occur. Those facts supported the Department's finding that the securities had no Florida taxable situs.

Accountants and tax professionals

Identify the exact ownership interest and registration status. The statutory exception described in the ruling concerned a limited-partner interest in an SEC-registered limited partnership, which was not the arrangement presented.

Common questions

Q: Were the partnership's marketable securities subject to Florida intangible tax?
A: No. The Department found that the securities lacked Florida taxable situs.

Q: Did the partners' Florida residence make the securities taxable?
A: Not on these facts. The partnership's operations, meetings, brokerage management, and banking were all outside Florida.

Q: Were the Florida residents' general-partnership interests taxable?
A: No. The Department applied the partnership-interest exemption in section 199.185(1)(c).

Q: Was the partnership registered with the SEC?
A: No. The facts expressly said it would not be registered with the SEC.

Q: Can another partnership rely on this TAA?
A: Not automatically. The advisement states that it binds the Department only under the facts and circumstances described in the request, and later legal changes or judicial interpretations may produce a different result.

Citations and references

  • Fla. Stat. § 199.032 — annual tax on intangible property owned, managed, or controlled by a person domiciled or having taxable situs in Florida
  • Fla. Stat. § 199.175 — Florida taxable situs
  • Fla. Stat. § 199.185(1)(c) — partnership-interest exemption and the stated SEC-registered limited-partnership exception
  • Fla. Stat. § 213.22 — Technical Assistance Advisements
  • Fla. Stat. ch. 119 — public records

Source

Original ruling text

Dec 09, 1996

Re: Technical Assistance Advisement No. 96(C)2-129
Intangible Tax - Partnership Interest - Investment
Securities
Sections 199.185, 199.175 & 199.052, F.S.
XXX (Taxpayer "A")
XXX (Taxpayer "B")
XXX (Taxpayer "C")

Dear :

This is in response to your letter dated October 7, 1996,
requesting a Technical Assistance Advisement on the referenced
issue.

Statement of the Facts

Taxpayer A and Taxpayer B each reside in the State of
Florida. Taxpayer A and B formed an out of state partnership,
Taxpayer C. The partnership was formed for the purpose of
investing in marketable securities and other similar investment
assets. All business operations of the partnership occur
outside the State, including quarterly business meetings. The
investment accounts are managed by a brokerage firm and banks,
which operate outside Florida. The partnership will not be
registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).

Request for Advisement

Will the securities owned by Taxpayer C be subject to
annual Florida Intangible Tax? If so, who is required to file
the return and remit the tax?

Will the general partnership interest of Taxpayers A and B
in Taxpayer C be subject to the annual Florida Intangible Tax?

Provision of the Law

Section 199.032, F.S., imposes an annual tax of 2 mills on
all intangible property that is owned, managed or controlled by
a person domiciled or having a taxable situs in Florida.

Section 199.175, F.S., provides that intangible personal
property shall have taxable situs in this state when it is
owned, managed, or controlled by any person domiciled in this
State.

Regarding the taxability of any interest in a Partnership,
s. 199.185 (1)(c), F.S., provides that a partner's interest in a
partnership, whether general or limited, is exempt, with the
exception of any interest as a limited partner in a limited
partnership registered with the SEC, pursuant to the Securities
Act of 1933.

Conclusion

Since the securities will not have a taxable situs in this
State, no annual Florida intangible tax will be due.
Additionally, the general partnership interest will not be
subject to tax.

This response constitutes a Technical Assistance Advisement
under s. 213.22, F.S., which is binding on the Department only
under the facts and circumstances described in the request for
this advice as specified in s. 213.22, F.S. Our response is
predicated on those facts and the specific situation summarized
above. You are advised that subsequent statutory or
administrative rule changes or judicial interpretations of the
statutes or rules upon which this advice is based may subject
similar future transactions to a different treatment than
expressed in this response.

You are further advised that this response and your request
are public records under Chapter 119, F.S., which are subject to
disclosure to the public under the conditions of s. 213.22, F.S.
Your name, address, and any other details which might lead to
identification of the taxpayer must be deleted by the Department
before disclosure. In an effort to protect the confidentiality
of such information, we request you notify the undersigned in

writing within 15 days of any deletions you wish made to the
request or the response.

Sincerely,

Celestine Grantham
Senior Tax Specialist
Tax Policy and Dispute Resolution
Office of General Counsel

CG/mh

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 1996 ruling on this question. Ezel checks current Florida tax law and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.