FL TAA 96C2-108R Intangible Personal Property Tax 1996-12-20

Did a Florida grantor-beneficiary owe intangible tax after transferring assets to a foreign-situs trust but retaining consent power over pledges and dispositions?

Short answer: Yes, in her capacity as grantor. She had no taxable beneficial interest because she lacked a current income right and the specified beneficiary powers, but her required written consent before the trustee could pledge or dispose of trust property meant she retained ownership, management, and control and had to file a Florida intangible-tax return.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1996. Ezel answers yours, under current Florida tax law, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1996
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is the official revised Florida TAA 96C2-108R, superseding the October 10, 1996 advisement for the Florida-resident grantor-beneficiary's foreign-situs trust, non-Florida trustee, distribution rights, and retained consent power. Under section 213.22, it binds the Department only for those trust provisions and facts. Different income rights, revocation or appointment powers, consent rights, trustee location, asset control, or later law could change the result.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The Florida resident had no taxable beneficial interest in the foreign trust, but she still had to file an intangible-tax return because she retained control as grantor.

As beneficiary, she had no current right to income, no right to revoke the trust, no general power of appointment, and no stated right to invade the corpus. Those facts did not create the taxable beneficial interest described in the statute and rule.

The revised ruling added a decisive trust provision: the trustee needed the grantor's written consent before pledging or disposing of trust property. The Department found that this consent right left the Florida-resident grantor with ownership, management, and control of the trust assets. The assets therefore had Florida taxable situs through her, and she was responsible for filing.

What this means for you

Beneficiary rights and grantor control are separate questions. A person can lack a taxable beneficial interest yet still own, manage, or control the trust assets through retained approval powers. Trust documents should be reviewed for consent rights over pledges, sales, and other dispositions, not only for income and revocation provisions.

Common questions

Q: Did the beneficiary have a taxable beneficial interest?
A: No. She lacked a current income right and the specified revocation, corpus-invasion, and general appointment powers.

Q: Why did she still have to file?
A: As grantor, her written consent was required before the trustee could pledge or dispose of trust property, which the Department treated as retained ownership, management, and control.

Q: Did the non-Florida location of the trustee end the analysis?
A: No. The retained control of the Florida-resident grantor gave the intangible property Florida taxable situs under the revised ruling.

Q: How did this differ from the original TAA 96C2-108?
A: The revision considered the grantor-consent provision and concluded that the resident grantor had filing responsibility despite lacking a taxable beneficial interest.

Citations and references

  • Fla. Stat. § 199.023(7) — taxable beneficial interests in foreign-situs trusts
  • Fla. Stat. § 199.052(1), (5) — filing responsibility
  • Fla. Stat. § 199.175(1) — ownership, management, control, and taxable situs
  • Fla. Admin. Code r. 12C-2.002(1)(c) — foreign-trust beneficial interests
  • Fla. Stat. § 213.22 — Technical Assistance Advisements

Source

Original ruling text

Status: Supersedes TAA 96C2-108, issued October 10, 1996

             Dec 20, 1996

Re: Technical Assistance Advisement No. 96(C)2-108 REVISED
Intangible Tax; Taxable Situs- Foreign Trust
Sections 199.023(7), 199.052(6), 199.052(7), 199.175(1),
F.S.
XXX (hereinafter referred to as "Grantor")
XXX (hereinafter referred to as the "Trust")
XXX (hereinafter referred to as the "Trustee")

Dear :

This office has received your request for a Technical
Assistance Advisement for the trust listed above.

       Discussion of Trust Provisions

Under the provisions of the Trust, the Grantor, a Florida
resident and beneficiary of the Trust, will assign all of her
rights, title and interest in and to certain intangibles to the
Trust. The Trustee is a resident of the State of XXX, and the
situs for the Trust is in the State of XXX. The Trustee does
not have an office in Florida. The beneficiary of the Trust
does not have a current right to income; and the Trustee has
been granted full discretion for distributions of income and
principal. The beneficiary does not have the right to revoke her
Trust nor does she have a general power of appointment. If the
beneficiary dies prior to the end of the Term of the Trust, the
assets shall be payable to the beneficiary's revocable trust, if
any, and if none, to the beneficiary's estate. Based upon the
provisions of the Trust under Article III.C.6, the Trustee must
obtain the written consent of the Grantor "prior to pledging,
hypothetically (Sic) or disposing of any trust property."

           Provisions of Law

Section 199.023(7), F.S., and Rule 12C-2.002(1)(c), F.A.C.,


Page 2

provide that a taxable beneficial interest in a foreign-situs
trust is the current right to income coupled with either a right
to revoke the trust, or the right to invade the corpus of the
trust, or an unlimited power of appointment of future
beneficiaries.

Section 199.052(5), F.S., places primary responsibility for
payment of the intangible tax on the trustee of a Florida
situs trust. To have a taxable situs in Florida the trust
must meet the provisions of s. 199.175(1), F.S., which
states that intangible personal property has a taxable
situs in this state when it is owned, managed, or
controlled by any person domiciled in this state on January
1 of the tax year.

             Discussion of Law

Based upon the provisions of the Trust under Article
III.C.6, the Grantor, a Florida resident, retains ownership,
management and control of the trust assets. As a beneficiary,
she does not have a taxable beneficial interest in the Trust.
However, as the Grantor and Florida resident, she meets the
provisions of s. 199.052(1), F.S., and is responsible for filing
a Florida intangible tax return because she falls under s.
199.175(1), F.S., due to the taxable situs of the intangible
property which is owned, managed and controlled by her.

This response constitutes a Technical Assistance Advisement
under s. 213.22, F.S., which is binding on the Department only
under the facts and circumstances described in the request for
this advice as specified in s. 213.22, F.S. Our response is
predicated on those facts and the specific situation summarized
above. You are advised that subsequent statutory or
administrative rule changes or judicial interpretations of the
statutes or rules upon which this advice is based may subject
similar future transactions to a different treatment than
expressed in this response.

You are further advised that this response and your request
are public records under Chapter 119, F.S., which are subject to
disclosure to the public under the conditions of s. 213.22, F.S.


Page 3

Your name, address, and any other details which might lead to
identification of the taxpayer must be deleted by the Department
before disclosure. In an effort to protect the confidentiality
of such information, we request you notify the undersigned in
writing within 15 days of any deletions you wish made to the
request or the response.

                Sincerely,


                Joy B. Eldred, C.P.A.
                Tax Law Specialist
                Tax Policy and Dispute Resolution
                Office of General Counsel

JE/mh

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 1996 ruling on this question. Ezel checks current Florida tax law and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.