FL TAA 96C2-078 Intangible Personal Property Tax 1996-09-06

Were an out-of-state manufacturer's receivables from Florida customers subject to Florida intangible tax when its salesperson regularly visited the state?

Short answer: Yes. Florida ruled that receivables from Florida customers had Florida business situs because the manufacturer's salesperson regularly entered the state to call on customers and solicit orders, and the receivables would be enforced through Florida courts. The result applied even though the company had no Florida office, warehouse, inventory, or permanently based personnel.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1996. Ezel answers yours, under current Florida tax law, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1996
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is an official Technical Assistance Advisement of the Florida Department of Revenue, issued to a requester under section 213.22, Florida Statutes, on the facts and circumstances described in the request. The advisement's standard closing states that it binds the Department only under those facts and circumstances and that later statutory or administrative-rule changes or judicial interpretations may produce a different result. Identifying details may be redacted. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice. Consult a licensed Florida tax professional about your specific facts.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Florida ruled that the out-of-state manufacturer's accounts receivable from Florida customers were subject to Florida intangible tax.

The company manufactured and stored its products outside Florida and shipped them by common carrier. It had no Florida office, warehouse, inventory, or permanently located employee or independent representative.

Its southeastern salesperson nevertheless entered Florida for company business on 19 days in 1995 and 16 days in 1994. During those visits, the salesperson called on existing and potential customers and solicited orders, which remained subject to approval at the out-of-state headquarters.

The Department treated those regular in-state sales activities as business transacted in Florida. It also noted that claims against Florida customers or property would have to be enforced through Florida courts. The resulting receivables therefore had Florida business situs.

What this means for you

  • A business did not avoid intangible-tax situs merely because it lacked permanent Florida property or personnel.
  • Regular visits by a traveling salesperson were enough on these facts to connect Florida receivables to in-state business activity.
  • The ruling focused on receivables arising from Florida customer sales, not every asset of the out-of-state company.

Common questions

Q: Did the company maintain property in Florida?
A: No. It had no Florida office, warehouse, inventory, or other assets.

Q: What Florida activity mattered?
A: Its salesperson regularly visited Florida customers and prospects and solicited orders there.

Q: Were the Florida customer receivables taxable?
A: Yes. The Department concluded they arose from Florida business and had Florida taxable situs.

Citations and references

  • Fla. Stat. § 199.175(2)(a) — Florida business situs for intangible personal property
  • Fla. Stat. § 213.22 — Technical Assistance Advisements

Source

Original ruling text

Sep 06, 1996

Re: Technical Assistance Advisement No. 96(C)2-078
Intangible Tax; Taxable Situs
Section 199.175, F.S.
XXX (Corporation A)

Dear :

Your letter requesting a Technical Assistance Advisement has
been received by this office. The request deals with the
taxation of accounts receivable from Florida customers owned by
a non-Florida corporation having a sales representative
contacting customers, at the customer's location within Florida.

FACTS

The facts that you have provided to the department are as
follows:

Corporation A manufactures a product at plants in another state.
Corporation A sells its product to customers located in Florida.
The product is shipped via common carrier from Corporation A's
warehouses in another state. Corporation A does not maintain an
office or warehouse, rented or owned, in Florida. Corporation A
maintains no inventory or other assets in Florida. Corporation
A has no employees or independent sales representatives
permanently located in Florida.

The travel records of the salesperson who covers the
southeastern United States shows the salesperson was physically
present in Florida on Corporation A's business 19 days in 1995,
and 16 days in 1994. While in Florida, the salesperson makes
calls on existing and potential customers and solicits orders,
subject to approval at Corporation A's headquarters in another
state.

ISSUE

Based on the facts as stated above, you have requested a ruling
on the following issue:

Will the accounts receivable from Florida customers owned by
Corporation A be subject to Florida intangible tax?

LAW AND DISCUSSION

Section 199.175, F.S., states in pertinent part:

(2) Intangible personal property shall have a taxable situs
in this state when it is deemed to have a business situs in
this state and it is owned, managed, or controlled by a
person transacting business in this state, even though the
owner may claim a domicile elsewhere. This provision shall
apply regardless of where the intangible is created,
approved, or paid.

a) Intangibles shall be deemed to have a Florida business
situs when they receive the benefit and protection of
Florida laws and courts and they are derived from, arise
out of, or are issued in connection with the business
transacted in this state. For the purpose of this
paragraph:
...

  1. Business is transacted in this state when any
    occupation, profession, or commercial activity, including
    financing, leasing, selling, or servicing is regularly
    conducted with customers in this state by or through
    agents, employees, or representatives of any kind in this
    state, whether or not such persons are vested with
    discretionary authority....

It is your position that Corporation A has no taxable situs in
Florida, even though its representatives call on Florida
customers at the customers' Florida locations.

In response to your position; not only does the representative
of Corporation A make regular trips to Florida but the accounts
receivable must be enforced in Florida. No other jurisdiction
can effect a claim against a person or property located in

Florida other than the Florida courts.

CONCLUSION

It is the opinion of this office that the accounts receivable
arising out of the business conducted by Corporation A in
Florida are subject to Florida's intangible tax.

This response constitutes a Technical Assistance Advisement
under s. 213.22, F.S., which is binding on the Department only
under the facts and circumstances described in the request for
this advice as specified in s. 213.22, F.S. Our response is
predicated on those facts and the specific situation summarized
above. You are advised that subsequent statutory or
administrative rule changes or judicial interpretations of the
statutes or rules upon which this advice is based may subject
similar future transactions to a different treatment than
expressed in this response.

You are further advised that this response and your request are
public records under Chapter 119, F.S., which are subject to
disclosure to the public under the conditions of s. 213.22, F.S.
Your name, address, and any other details which might lead to
identification of the taxpayer must be deleted by the Department
before disclosure. In an effort to protect the confidentiality
of such information, we request you notify the undersigned in
writing within 15 days of any deletions you wish made to the
request or the response.

Sincerely,

Maryella Ingram
Tax Law Specialist
Tax Policy & Dispute Resolution

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 1996 ruling on this question. Ezel checks current Florida tax law and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.