FL TAA 96C2-075 Intangible Personal Property Tax 1996-08-12

Did receivables transferred by a Florida parent to an out-of-state subsidiary retain Florida intangible-tax situs when the parent performed only collection support?

Short answer: No, if the Florida parent's work stayed within the listed ministerial and processing functions. The out-of-state subsidiary's receivables then lacked Florida taxable situs, regardless of whether the parent performed those tasks inside or outside Florida. The subsidiary's note to the parent was taxable to the parent but could be eliminated as an intercompany receivable on a timely consolidated return.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1996. Ezel answers yours, under current Florida tax law, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1996
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is an official Technical Assistance Advisement of the Florida Department of Revenue, issued to a requester under section 213.22, Florida Statutes, on the facts and circumstances described in the request. The advisement's standard closing states that it binds the Department only under those facts and circumstances and that later statutory or administrative-rule changes or judicial interpretations may produce a different result. Identifying details may be redacted. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice. Consult a licensed Florida tax professional about your specific facts.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Florida found no intangible-tax situs for receivables owned by the out-of-state subsidiary as long as the Florida parent's work remained ministerial.

Before January 1, the Florida parent transferred receivables to a separately managed subsidiary domiciled outside Florida. The subsidiary had no Florida sales, property, agents, employees, or representatives. It gave the parent an arm's-length, market-interest promissory note.

For a fee, the parent would maintain collection records, check compliance before transfer, report balances and aging, account for payments sent to the subsidiary, communicate routinely about late payments, and report uncollected accounts. The Department classified those tasks as ministerial or processing functions rather than management or control.

The result did not change depending on whether the parent performed those limited functions in or outside Florida. The note itself was an intangible asset of the Florida parent, but it could be excluded as an intercompany receivable if the companies timely filed a qualifying consolidated Florida return.

What this means for you

  • The parent's activities could not exceed the specifically listed collection-support functions.
  • Separate domicile, management, officers, directors, and the subsidiary's lack of Florida activity supported the no-situs conclusion.
  • Filing a consolidated return did not itself create situs, but it could eliminate the intercompany note from taxation.

Common questions

Q: Were the subsidiary's receivables taxable in Florida?
A: No, while the facts and the parent's limited activities remained as described.

Q: Did it matter where the parent performed the ministerial work?
A: No.

Q: Was the subsidiary's promissory note taxable to the parent?
A: It was an intangible asset of the parent, but a timely consolidated return could exclude it as an intercompany receivable.

Citations and references

  • Fla. Stat. § 199.032 — annual intangible tax
  • Fla. Stat. § 199.052 — return requirements, ministerial functions, and consolidated returns
  • Fla. Stat. § 199.175 — taxable situs of intangible property
  • Fla. Stat. § 213.22 — Technical Assistance Advisements

Source

Original ruling text

Aug 12, 1996

Re: Technical Assistance Advisement No. 96(C)2-075
Intangible Tax - Taxable Situs
XXX ("Parent, Inc.")
XXX ("Subsidiary Corp.")

Dear :

Your letter requesting a Technical Assistance Advisement has
been received by this office. The request deals with the
taxation of intangible property transferred to a non-Florida
entity.

FACTS

Parent, Inc., is incorporated in Florida and owns accounts
receivable. Parent has a subsidiary corporation organized
outside of Florida. Subsidiary, Corp., is commercially
domiciled, and maintains its principal office, outside of
Florida. Subsidiary will have no sales or property in Florida
and will not have any agents, employees, or representative of
any kind in Florida. The corporations will have separate
officers and directors.

Prior to January 1, 1996, Parent transferred its accounts
receivable to Subsidiary in exchange for a promissory note
bearing a market rate of interest and reflecting arm's length
terms and conditions. Parent will perform the following
activities for the Subsidiary for which it will receive a fee:

  1. maintain the books and records necessary for the collection
    of the receivables;
  2. ensure that the receivables are in compliance with the
    credit and collection policies of Subsidiary and the
    receivables are not in default prior to transfer;
  3. report activities, outstanding balances, and aging of
    receivables to Subsidiary on a periodic basis;
  4. account for the payment of the receivables which will be

sent to Subsidiary;

  1. perform routine communications with the customer regarding
    late payments and credit problems; and,
  2. notify Subsidiary of uncollected accounts by transmittal of
    a status report.

Parent and Subsidiary will file a consolidated Florida
intangible personal property tax return.

ISSUES

  1. Are the receivables which are sold by Parent to Subsidiary
    and owned by Subsidiary on January 1 subject to the Florida
    intangible tax?

  2. Do the stated activities of Parent constitute ministerial
    functions or processing activities under s. 199.052, F.S.

  3. Does it make a difference whether Parent performs the
    ministerial functions within Florida or outside of Florida?
  4. If Parent receives a promissory note from Subsidiary on the
    sale of the receivables, may the promissory note be
    eliminated from its taxable intangibles through the filing
    of a consolidated intangible personal property tax return?

LAW AND DISCUSSION

For purposes of the annual tax imposed under s. 199.032, F.S.,
intangible personal property shall have a taxable situs in this
state when it is owned, managed, or controlled by any person
domiciled in this state on January 1 of the tax year, as
provided in s. 199.175, F.S. "Any person domiciled in this
state" means: (a) any natural person who is a legal resident of
this state; (b) any bank or financial institution, company,
corporation, partnership, or other artificial entity organized
or created under the laws of this state, except a trust; or (c)
any person, including a trust, who has established a commercial
domicile in this state. A business or other artificial entity
acquires its commercial domicile in this state when it maintains
its chief or principal office in this state where executive or
management functions are performed or where the course of
business operations is determined.

Intangible personal property shall have a taxable situs in this
state when it is deemed to have a business situs in this state
and it is owned, managed, or controlled by a person transacting
business in this state, even though the owner may claim a
domicile elsewhere. Intangibles shall be deemed to have a
Florida business situs when they receive the benefit and
protection of Florida laws and courts and they are derived from,
arise out of, or are issued in connection with business
transacted in this state with a customer in this state.

Subsection 199.052(10), F.S., provides for the filing of a
consolidated intangible tax return, and the elimination of
intercompany accounts of qualifying members of the consolidated
group. The filing of a consolidated return will not in itself
provide a business situs for intangible personal property held
by a corporation.

CONCLUSION

  1. The Parent will not be subject to the Florida intangible
    tax on the receivables on January 1, 1996, so long as the
    activities of the Parent do not exceed the outlined
    activities. Subsidiary's intangibles will not have taxable
    situs in Florida, and therefore, will not be subject to the
    Florida intangible tax.
  2. The outlined activities of Parent constitute ministerial
    functions or processing activities under s. 199.052, F.S.
  3. It makes no difference whether Parent performs the
    ministerial functions within Florida or outside of Florida.
  4. The note represents an asset subject to the Florida
    intangible tax to the Parent. However, the note represents
    an intercompany receivable and can be excluded from
    taxation if Parent and Subsidiary timely file a Florida
    consolidated tax return.

This response constitutes a Technical Assistance Advisement
under s. 213.22, F.S., which is binding on the Department only
under the facts and circumstances described in the request for
this advice as specified in s. 213.22, F.S. Our response is
predicated on those facts and the specific situation summarized

above. You are advised that subsequent statutory or
administrative rule changes or judicial interpretations of the
statutes or rules upon which this advice is based may subject
similar future transactions to a different treatment than
expressed in this response.

You are further advised that this response and your request are
public records under Chapter 119, F.S., which are subject to
disclosure to the public under the conditions of s. 213.22, F.S.
Your name, address, and any other details which might lead to
identification of the taxpayer must be deleted by the Department
before disclosure. In an effort to protect the confidentiality
of such information, we request you notify the undersigned in
writing within 15 days of any deletions you wish made to the
request or the response.

Sincerely,

Maryella Ingram
Tax Law Specialist
Tax Policy & Dispute Resolution

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 1996 ruling on this question. Ezel checks current Florida tax law and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.