FL TAA 96C2-068 Intangible Personal Property Tax 1996-07-10

How did Florida determine the intangible-tax exemption for fund shares backed by federal and Florida tax-exempt securities?

Short answer: Fund shares were exempt when the underlying portfolio held only exempt assets at the statutory valuation time. Value attributable to direct U.S. obligations remained exempt. If the rest of the portfolio contained any taxable asset, that remaining net asset value was taxable. Holdings at other times of the year were ignored, and the registered investment companies themselves were exempt and lacked Florida situs.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1996. Ezel answers yours, under current Florida tax law, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1996
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is an official Technical Assistance Advisement of the Florida Department of Revenue, issued to a requester under section 213.22, Florida Statutes, on the facts and circumstances described in the request. The advisement's standard closing states that it binds the Department only under those facts and circumstances and that later statutory or administrative-rule changes or judicial interpretations may produce a different result. Identifying details may be redacted. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice. Consult a licensed Florida tax professional about your specific facts.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Florida allowed the fund-share exemption to follow the exempt character of the underlying portfolio at the statutory valuation time.

The structure involved registered investment companies using a hub-and-spoke arrangement. A fund series would invest substantially all assets in a portfolio holding short-term Florida municipal securities and other obligations exempt from Florida intangible tax.

The Department set out a sequence. First, the portion of net asset value attributable to direct U.S. government obligations was exempt. If all remaining assets were also exempt under Florida law, the rest of the fund value was exempt too. If the remaining portfolio contained any taxable asset, the remaining net asset value was taxable.

Shares owned on January 1 were valued at net asset value as of the close of the prior year's last business day. Securities held at other times during the prior or current year did not enter that snapshot. The Trust, Fund, Series, and Florida Series themselves were also not subject to the tax because of the registered-investment-company exemption and lack of Florida situs.

What this means for you

  • The fund-share exemption depended on the portfolio's composition at the statutory valuation snapshot.
  • Direct U.S. government obligations retained their exemption even if other portfolio assets were taxable.
  • Midyear holdings did not change the annual valuation described in the ruling.

Common questions

Q: Were shares fully exempt when all underlying assets were exempt?
A: Yes.

Q: What happened if the nonfederal remainder held a taxable asset?
A: The Department said that remaining portion of net asset value was taxable.

Q: Were the registered investment companies themselves taxable?
A: No, under the exemption and no-situs facts cited in the ruling.

Citations and references

  • 31 U.S.C. § 3124(a) — state-tax exemption for federal obligations
  • Fla. Stat. § 199.032 — annual intangible tax
  • Fla. Stat. § 199.103(2) — valuation date and net asset value
  • Fla. Stat. § 199.175 — taxable situs
  • Fla. Stat. § 199.185(1) — exempt assets and registered investment companies
  • Fla. Stat. § 213.22 — Technical Assistance Advisements

Source

Original ruling text

Jul 10, 1996

Re: Technical Assistance Advisement 96(C)2-068
Intangible Tax - Valuation - Property Subject to Tax
XXX ("Trust")
XXX ("Fund")
XXX ("Series")
Sections 199.103, 199.175, 199.185, F.S.
Rule 12C-2.010, F.A.C.

Dear :

This letter is in response to your request for a Technical
Assistance Advisement on the application of the Intangible tax
to the referenced securities.

Statement of Facts

"Trust" is a Massachusetts business trust, established
pursuant to a declaration of trust governed by the laws of the
Commonwealth of Massachusetts. "Trust" operates as an open-end
management investment company, and is registered with the
Securities and Exchange Commission under the Investment Company
Act of 1940, as amended. The declaration of trust permits
"Trust" to offer an unlimited number of separate portfolios,
each of which would be established as a separate subtrust with
interests therein separate and distinct from the interests in
any other portfolios in the series. Interest in the various
portfolios in the series, which would be classified as
partnership interest for federal income tax purposes, would be
held by various funds, including those described below, and
institutional investors. Each portfolio in the series would
constitute a separate part of a hub and spoke structure.

"Fund" is an open-end management investment company
established as a Massachusetts business trust under declaration
of trust. "Fund" itself has several separate series of shares
representing interest in a separate portfolio of securities.
Among such portfolios in the series is "Series." "Series" is

managed and controlled outside Florida, and is treated as a
registered investment company for federal income tax purposes.
The primary objective of "Series" is to achieve current income
that is exempt from regular federal income tax. "Series"
constitutes a spoke of the hub and spoke structure. "Series"
will invest all or substantially all of its assets in a newly
established portfolio series of "Trust" ("Florida Series") that
will only invest in municipal obligations that are exempt from
Florida intangible tax. "Florida Series" will have the same
investment objective, policies, and limitations as "Series."
"Florida Series" will pursue its investment objective through
investment in Florida municipal securities maturing in 13 months
or less.

Requested Rulings

"1. An advisement is requested that the shares of "Series"
are exempt from Florida intangible personal property tax levied
by s. 199.032, F.S. in each year that "Series" owns, on January
1 of that year, only an interest is a series of "Trust" whose
portfolio of investments is limited to notes, bonds, and other
obligations issued by the State of Florida or its
municipalities, counties, and other taxing districts, the United
States Government and its agencies, instrumentalities,
territories, and possessions, including without limitation
Puerto Rico, Guam, American Samoa, Northern Mariana Islands, and
the U.S. Virgin Islands, and other property exempt from Florida
intangible personal property tax under s. 199.185(1), F.S."
"2. An advisement is requested that the exemption from
Florida intangible personal property tax described in Advisement
1., above, based upon the ownership of exempt assets on January
1 of a calendar year, still applies notwithstanding that
"Series," through its interest in "Florida Series," may own nonexempt securities at any time thereafter during the same
calendar year or in the preceding calendar year."
"3. An advisement is requested that, if on January 1 of any
year, "Trust's" portfolio of assets contains any property not
exempt from Florida intangible personal property tax, the
portion of the net asset value attributable to direct
obligations of the United States Government or territories or
possessions of the United States Government nevertheless will

continue to be exempt from such tax."
"4. An Advisement is requested that neither "Series" nor
"Trust" is subject to Florida's intangible personal property tax
levied by s. 199.032, F.S."

Response to Requested Advisement

The first advisement is answered in the positive. This
type of fund is governed by federal and Florida law for purposes
of valuation. Obligations of the United States Government are
exempt from state taxes under 31 U.S.C. s. 3124(a). Under
Florida law shares of a trust, whose portfolio of assets is
invested in assets that are exempt from tax, are themselves
exempt from tax.

Applying the federal statute and Florida statute to the
"Fund" requires that the following guidelines be used to
determine what portion, if any, of the net asset value of the
"Fund" will be exempt from taxation:

The portion of the net asset value of the "Fund", that is
attributed to direct obligations of the United States
Government, is exempt from taxation.

If the remaining portion of the net asset value of the
"Fund", after removing the portion representing United
States Government obligations, represents assets which are
themselves exempt from Florida's intangible tax, then this
portion of the net assets of the "Fund's" portfolio is also
exempt from tax.

If the remaining portion of the net asset value of the
"Fund", after removing the portion attributable to United
States Government obligations, represents any asset that is
taxable under Florida law, then the remaining portion of
the net asset value of the "Fund" is subject to tax.

The second advisement requested is answered in the
positive. Section 199.103, F.S., prescribes the day on which
intangible personal property subject to annual taxation is to be
valued. Shares of trust owned by Florida residents on January 1

of the tax year are to be valued at net asset value as of the
close of business on the last business day of the previous
calendar year (s. 199.103(2), F.S.) Securities owned by the
Fund at other times of the year are not considered when
calculating the value as prescribed by the statute.

The third requested advisement is answered by the response
to the first advisement. (See response to first requested
advisement.)

The fourth requested advisement is answered in the
positive. The assets of a company registered under the
Investment Act of 1940 are exempt from tax under s.
199.185(1)(g), F.S. Further, there is no indication that
"Trust", "Fund", "Series", or "Florida Series" have a taxable
situs in Florida as described in s. 199.175, F.S.

This response constitutes a Technical Assistance Advisement
under s. 213.22, F.S., which is binding on the Department only
under the facts and circumstances described in the request for
this advice as specified in s. 213.22, F.S. Our response is
predicated on those facts and the specific situation summarized
above. You are advised that subsequent statutory or
administrative rule changes or judicial interpretations of the
statutes or rules upon which this advice is based may subject
similar future transactions to a different treatment than
expressed in this response.

You are further advised that this response and your request
are public records under Chapter 119, F.S., which are subject to
disclosure to the public under the conditions of s. 213.22, F.S.
Your name, address, and any other details which might lead to
identification of the taxpayer must be deleted by the Department
before disclosure. In an effort to protect the confidentiality
of such information, we request you notify the undersigned in
writing within 15 days of any deletions you wish made to the
request or the response.

Sincerely,

J.V. Parramore. Jr.

Tax Law Specialist
Tax Policy and Dispute Resolution
Office of General Counsel
JVP/mh

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 1996 ruling on this question. Ezel checks current Florida tax law and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.