Did intangibles and a promissory note between two out-of-state affiliates acquire Florida situs when one performed directed processing work?

Short answer No. The affiliate managed and controlled the intangibles from outside Florida, while the seller performed only directed bookkeeping, collection, and processing without independent judgment. The seller owed no tax on assets transferred before January 1. The promissory note also lacked Florida situs because both corporations were non-Florida domiciliaries and the note arose from out-of-state business.
State
FL
Ruling
TAA 96C2-065
Tax type
Intangible Personal Property Tax
Issued
1996-06-13
Issued by
Florida Department of Revenue
Requested by
Out-of-state finance company transferring intangibles to an out-of-state affiliate

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1996. Ask about yours and see what current Florida tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1996
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is an official Technical Assistance Advisement of the Florida Department of Revenue, issued to a requester under section 213.22, Florida Statutes, on the facts and circumstances described in the request. The advisement's standard closing states that it binds the Department only under those facts and circumstances and that later statutory or administrative-rule changes or judicial interpretations may produce a different result. Identifying details may be redacted. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice. Consult a licensed Florida tax professional about your specific facts.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Florida found no taxable situs for the transferred intangibles or the related promissory note.

Both the parent and affiliate were organized and principally based outside Florida. The parent transferred commercial-finance intangibles to the affiliate at face value for an arm's-length, market-interest note. The affiliate managed and controlled the assets from its own out-of-state office.

The parent performed only booking, recordkeeping, collection, and other processing functions at the affiliate's direction and without independent judgment. Those tasks did not amount to management or control, so they did not create Florida situs for the affiliate's assets.

The parent owed no Florida intangible tax on assets transferred before year end. The note also lacked Florida situs because it was owned by a non-Florida corporation and arose from business conducted outside Florida.

What this means for you

  • Both entities' out-of-state domicile and the affiliate's retained control supported the result.
  • The parent's services had to remain ministerial and directed.
  • Unlike consolidated-group rulings, these companies did not rely on an intercompany elimination.

Common questions

Q: Were the affiliate-owned intangibles taxable in Florida? A: No.

Q: Did the parent's collection work create situs? A: No, because it was ministerial and required no independent judgment.

Q: Was the promissory note taxable? A: No.

Citations and references

  • Fla. Stat. § 199.023(3) — person definition
  • Fla. Stat. § 199.032 — annual intangible tax
  • Fla. Stat. § 199.052(1) — ministerial functions and filing
  • Fla. Stat. § 199.175(1) — taxable situs by domicile
  • Fla. Stat. § 213.22 — Technical Assistance Advisements

Source

Original ruling text

Jun 13, 1996

Re: Technical Assistance Advisement No. 96(C)2-065 Intangible Tax - Taxable Situs - Accounts Receivable Sections 199.052 & 199.175, F.S. XXX (Parent) XXX (Affiliate)

Dear :

Your letter requesting a Technical Assistance Advisement has been referred to this office for response. Your specific request concerns the taxation of intangible property sold by Parent to Affiliate in exchange for a promissory note.

Statement of Facts

Parent is organized under the laws of the State of XXX and maintains its principal office in XX. Affiliate is a corporation organized under the laws of a State other than Florida and maintains its principal office in XXX. Parent is engaged in all aspects of the commercial finance business and lends primarily on a secured basis to middle market borrowers. In the course on engaging in business, Parent acquires intangible property from customers in Florida and customers in other states. On or before the end of the calendar year Parent will transfer its intangible assets to Affiliate. The intangibles will be transferred at face value for a promissory note that will bear a market rate of interest and will otherwise reflect arm's length terms and conditions.

During the period that Affiliate owns the intangible property, Affiliate will manage and control the intangible property from its office in XX. Parent will perform certain processing, accounting and other ministerial functions with respect to Affiliate's intangible property at its office in XXX. These functions will be limited to booking, record-keeping and collection functions performed at Affiliate's direction. Parent's collection activities will be taken only as directed by

Affiliate. Parent will not act as agent or representative of Affiliate with regard to the intangible property. On or after January 2 of the next calendar year Affiliate will transfer the intangible property back to Parent in satisfaction of its promissory note to Parent. Parent and Affiliate will not file a consolidated Florida Intangible tax return as both companies are domiciled outside Florida.

Issues

Based upon the scenario above, technical advice is requested on the following issues:

  1. Are the intangibles purchased by Affiliate subject to
    the Florida intangible tax?
  2. Will Parent be subject to intangible tax on the
    receivables it transfers to Affiliate prior to January 1?
  3. Will the promissory note from Affiliate to Parent that
    is made and executed outside Florida be subject to Florida intangible tax?

Provisions and Discussion of Law

Chapter 199, F.S., provides for the levy of intangible personal property taxes at the rate of 2 mills. The statutes require that the tax levied by s. 199.032, F.S., be paid by June 30th of each year. An intangible tax return must be filed with the Department of Revenue by every person authorized to do business in this state or doing business in this state, regardless of domicile, who on January 1 owned, controlled or managed intangible personal property that had a Florida taxable situs. (See s. 199.052(1), F.S.) The term "person" includes any individual, firm, partnership, joint adventure, or corporation. (See s. 199.023(3), F.S.) Section 199.175(1), F.S., provides that intangible property shall have a taxable situs in this state when it is owned, managed, or controlled by any person domiciled in this state.

With respect to the first basis for situs, as outlined in s. 199.175(1), F.S. (i.e., Florida domicile), Affiliate has its

principal place of business outside Florida. It follows that the intangible property of the Affiliate may be taxed only if Affiliate has a taxable situs in Florida. The ministerial and processing functions performed by Parent would not constitute the control or management of the intangible property of Affiliate. Section 199.052(1), F.S., provides that control or management does not include any ministerial function or any processing activity. All of the functions described above as performed by Parent constitute ministerial functions and processing activity. Therefore, Affiliate's intangibles do not have a taxable situs in Florida based on the activities of Parent.

With respect to Parent's sale of intangible property, it will owe no Florida intangible tax on the intangible property it transferred to Affiliate prior to year end. Further, Parent's activities relating to the intangibles while those intangibles are owned by Affiliate, will solely be ministerial. The activities of Parent will be limited to activities undertaken at Affiliate's direction that require no independent judgment. Therefore, Parent's activities will cause no taxable situs for the intangible property of Affiliate.

With respect to the promissory note received by Parent from Affiliate, in consideration for the intangible property, the promissory note will not be subject to the Florida intangible tax. Both Parent and Affiliate are non-domiciliary corporations. The promissory note received by Parent from Affiliate arose from business conducted outside Florida. Therefore, the note owned by a non-domiciliary, and arising from non-Florida business activity, has no taxable situs for Florida intangible tax purposes.

This response constitutes a Technical Assistance Advisement under s. 213.22, F.S., which is binding on the Department only under the facts and circumstances described in the request for this advice as specified in s. 213.22, F.S. Our response is predicated on those facts and the specific situation summarized above. You are advised that subsequent statutory or administrative rule changes or judicial interpretations of the statutes or rules upon which this advice is based may subject

similar future transactions to a different treatment than expressed in this response.

You are further advised that this response and your request are public records under Chapter 119, F.S., which are subject to disclosure to the public under the conditions of s. 213.22, F.S. Your name, address, and any other details which might lead to identification of the taxpayer must be deleted by the Department before disclosure. In an effort to protect the confidentiality of such information, we request you notify the undersigned in writing within 15 days of any deletions you wish made to the request or the response.

Sincerely,

J.V. Parramore, Jr.
Tax Law Specialist
Technical Assistance

JVP/mh

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1996. Ezel checks current Florida tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace