FL TAA 96C2-057 Intangible Personal Property Tax 1996-05-13

Did a Florida resident or an out-of-state partnership owe intangible tax after the resident contributed stock for partnership interests?

Short answer: No. After the contribution, the Florida resident no longer owned, managed, or controlled the stock, and the out-of-state partnership's stock had no Florida taxable situs. The resident's general- and limited-partner interests were also exempt because the partnership was not registered with the SEC.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1996. Ezel answers yours, under current Florida tax law, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1996
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is an official Technical Assistance Advisement of the Florida Department of Revenue, issued to a requester under section 213.22, Florida Statutes, on the facts and circumstances described in the request. The advisement's standard closing states that it binds the Department only under those facts and circumstances and that later statutory or administrative-rule changes or judicial interpretations may produce a different result. Identifying details may be redacted. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice. Consult a licensed Florida tax professional about your specific facts.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Florida found no intangible-tax liability for the resident, the contributed stock, the out-of-state partnership, or the partnership interests on the stated facts.

The Florida resident contributed publicly traded stock to an out-of-state limited partnership in exchange for both general- and limited-partner interests. On January 1, the partnership owned, managed, and controlled the stock. Its books, records, and office manager were outside Florida, and it was not registered or regulated by the SEC.

The resident no longer owned, managed, or controlled the contributed stock, so the resident was not taxed on it. The partnership's stock lacked Florida taxable situs. Section 199.185(1)(c) also exempted the resident's partnership interests because the limited partnership was not SEC registered.

What this means for you

  • Transferring ownership removed the contributed stock from the resident's personal holdings.
  • The partnership's out-of-state management and records supported its no-situs result.
  • The partnership-interest exemption depended on the limited partnership not being SEC registered.

Common questions

Q: Did the resident owe tax on the contributed stock?
A: No.

Q: Did the out-of-state partnership owe Florida tax on the stock?
A: No.

Q: Were the resident's partnership interests taxable?
A: No, provided the partnership was not registered with the SEC.

Citations and references

  • Fla. Stat. § 199.032 — annual intangible tax
  • Fla. Stat. § 199.175 — taxable situs
  • Fla. Stat. § 199.185(1)(c) — partnership-interest exemption
  • Fla. Stat. § 213.22 — Technical Assistance Advisements

Source

Original ruling text

May 13, 1996

Re: Technical Assistance Advisement No: 96(C)2-057
Intangible Tax - Partnership Interest
XXX (Petitioner)
XXX (Partnership)

Dear :

This is in response to your letter dated February 28, 1996
requesting a technical assistance advisement on the transfer of
stock to a partnership in exchange for partnership interest.

Statement of Facts

The Petitioner resides in the state of Florida and owns
various stock interests in publicly-traded companies. The
Petitioner contributed its stock to its out-of-state limited
partnership in exchange for the General Partner's interest and a
Limited Partner's interest in the partnership. As of January 1,
1996, the stock was owned, managed and controlled by the out-ofstate partnership. The Partnership is not registered or
regulated by the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC").
The Partnership's books and records are maintained in the office
outside the State of Florida. There is an employee in the
office who serves as the office manager.

Advisement

You request that the Department confirm the fact that after
the transfer of the stock to the partnership, neither the
Petitioner nor the Partnership will be liable for intangible tax
on either the stock or the partnership interest.

Provision of the Law

Section 199.032, F.S., imposes an annual tax of 2 mills on
all intangible property that is owned, managed or controlled by
a person domiciled or having a taxable situs in Florida.

Section 199.175, F.S., provides that intangible personal
property shall have taxable situs in this state when it is
owned, managed, or controlled by any person domiciled in this
state.

Regarding the taxability of any interest in a Partnership,
s. 199.185 (1)(c), F.S., provides that a partner's interest in a
partnership, whether general or limited, is exempt, with the
exception of any interest as a limited partner in a limited
partnership registered with the SEC, pursuant to the Securities
Act of 1933.

Conclusion

Once the stock is transferred to the out-of-state
Partnership, the Petitioner will no longer have ownership,
management or control of the transferred assets. Therefore, the
Petitioner will not be subject to the tax on the stocks which
were transferred to the Partnership. In addition, the
Partnership will not be liable for tax on the stocks because
such stocks have no taxable situs in this State. Finally,
providing the Partnership is not registered with the SEC, the
Petitioner's interest in the Partnership will not be subject to
the Florida intangible tax.

This response constitutes a Technical Assistance Advisement
under s. 213.22, F.S., which is binding on the Department only
under the facts and circumstances described in the request for
this advice as specified in s. 213.22, F.S. Our response is
predicated on those facts and the specific situation summarized
above. You are advised that subsequent statutory or
administrative rule changes or judicial interpretations of the
statutes or rules upon which this advice is based may subject
similar future transactions to a different treatment than
expressed in this response.

You are further advised that this response and your request
are public records under Chapter 119, F.S., which are subject to
disclosure to the public under the conditions of s. 213.22, F.S.
Your name, address, and any other details which might lead to

identification of the taxpayer must be deleted by the Department
before disclosure. In an effort to protect the confidentiality
of such information, we request you notify the undersigned in
writing within 15 days of any deletions you wish made to the
request or the response.

Sincerely,

Celestine Grantham
Senior Tax Specialist
Tax Policy and Dispute Resolution
Office of General Counsel

CG/mh

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 1996 ruling on this question. Ezel checks current Florida tax law and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.