FL TAA 96C2-033 Intangible Personal Property Tax 1996-04-01

Under Florida's 1996 intangible tax, were an out-of-state trustee, the grantor, or Florida custodians liable for an irrevocable trust's assets?

Short answer: No. The out-of-state trustee was not liable because management and control rested outside Florida. The grantor lacked the combination of rights required for a taxable beneficial interest, and Florida investment counsel, custodians, or brokers were not liable because they had no discretionary control or management authority.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1996. Ezel answers yours, under current Florida tax law, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1996
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is an official Technical Assistance Advisement of the Florida Department of Revenue, issued to a requester under section 213.22, Florida Statutes, on the facts and circumstances described in the request. The advisement's standard closing states that it binds the Department only under those facts and circumstances and that later statutory or administrative-rule changes or judicial interpretations may produce a different result. Identifying details may be redacted. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice. Consult a licensed Florida tax professional about your specific facts.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Florida found no 1996 intangible-tax liability for the trust's out-of-state trustee, its grantor, or the nondiscretionary investment professionals described.

The irrevocable trust required an out-of-state trustee, who could make discretionary distributions of income or principal for the grantor's benefit. The grantor and trustee had only limited powers of appointment. Florida investment counsel, custodians, or brokers could be hired, but they could not receive discretionary control or management over the trust's intangible property.

The Department said the trustee was outside Florida, the grantor did not have the rights required for a taxable beneficial interest, and the Florida service providers performed no discretionary management or control. None had to report the trust property or pay the intangible tax on these facts.

What this means for you

  • Trustee domicile determined the trust-situs analysis stated in the ruling.
  • A possible discretionary distribution did not give the grantor the cited taxable combination of rights.
  • Florida custody or investment services did not create liability without discretionary authority.

Common questions

Q: Was the out-of-state trustee liable for Florida intangible tax?
A: No.

Q: Did the grantor have a taxable beneficial interest?
A: No, under the trust terms described.

Q: Did using Florida custodians or brokers create tax liability?
A: No, because they lacked discretionary management or control.

Citations and references

  • Fla. Stat. § 199.032 — annual intangible tax
  • Fla. Stat. § 199.023(7) — taxable beneficial interest
  • Fla. Stat. § 199.052(1), (5) — management, control, and trust situs
  • Fla. Stat. § 199.175 — taxable situs
  • Fla. Admin. Code r. 12A-2.002(1)(c) — beneficial-interest definition
  • Fla. Admin. Code r. 12C-2.006(3) — trust situs
  • Fla. Stat. § 213.22 — Technical Assistance Advisements

Source

Original ruling text

Apr 01, 1996

Re: Technical Assistance Advisement No. 96(C)2-033
Florida Intangible Tax - Trust
XXX Grantor
XXX (the "Trustee")
XXX Trust

Dear :

Your letter requesting a Technical Assistance Advisement
has been referred to this office for response. The specific
scenario for which advice has been requested is summarized
below.

Statement of Fact

In X, the Grantor established an irrevocable trust
designating an out-of-state resident as sole Trustee. The
Trustee will pay or apply for the benefit of the Grantor, part
or all of the Trust income or principal which the Trustee
considers advisable. The Grantor and Trustee possess limited
powers of appointment. The Trust may never have a Trustee with
Florida domicile, although the Trustee of the Trust may employ
investment counsel, custodians and brokers in Florida and grant
such persons any type of authority over the account. However,
the counsel, custodians, and brokers may not have a
discretionary control or management over any intangible personal
property in its custody.

Requested Advisement

You request that we affirm the following:

  1. Based on the fact that as of January 1, the out-ofstate Trustee has responsibility for management and
    control of the Trust, the Trustee will not be liable
    for intangible tax.

2. Since the Grantor will not possess a taxable
beneficial interest in the Trust on January 1, the
Grantor will also not be liable for the tax.

  1. Since the investment counsel, custodian, or brokers
    will not possess discretionary authority to manage or
    control the property on January 1 of each year, it
    will not be required to return the property or pay
    tax.

Provision of the Law

Section 199.032, F.S., imposes an annual tax of 2 mills on
all intangible property that is owned, managed or controlled by
a person domiciled or having a taxable situs in Florida. (See
ss. 199.052 and 199.175, F.S.)

Section 199.023(7), F.S., and Rule 12A-2.002(1)(c), F.A.C.,
define taxable beneficial interest in a trust as the current
right to income coupled with either a right to revoke the trust,
the right to invade the corpus of the trust, or an unlimited
power of appointment of future beneficiaries.

Section 199.052(1), F.S., also provides that management or
control does not include any ministerial function or processing
activity. A trust will have a taxable situs in Florida if the
Trustee is domiciled in this State. (See s. 199.052(5), F.S.,
and Rule 12C-2.006(3), F.A.C.)

Conclusion

Based on the provisions of the statutes and the provisions
of the Trust, neither the Trustee, Grantor nor custodian are
liable for the Florida Intangible Personal Property Tax.

This response constitutes a Technical Assistance Advisement
under s. 213.22, F.S., which is binding on the Department only
under the facts and circumstances described in the request for
this advice as specified in s. 213.22, F.S. Our response is
predicated on those facts and the specific situation summarized
above. You are advised that subsequent statutory or
administrative rule changes or judicial interpretations of the

statutes or rules upon which this advice is based may subject
similar future transactions to a different treatment than
expressed in this response.

You are further advised that this response and your request
are public records under Chapter 119, F.S., which are subject to
disclosure to the public under the conditions of s. 213.22, F.S.
Your name, address, and any other details which might lead to
identification of the taxpayer must be deleted by the Department
before disclosure. In an effort to protect the confidentiality
of such information, we request you notify the undersigned in
writing within 15 days of any deletions you wish made to the
request or the response.

Sincerely,

Celestine Grantham
Senior Tax Specialist
Tax Policy and Dispute Resolution
Office of General Counsel

CG/mh

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 1996 ruling on this question. Ezel checks current Florida tax law and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.