Under Florida's 1996 intangible tax, did an out-of-state corporation or partnership acquire Florida situs because their Florida owners made investment decisions?

Short answer No. The out-of-state corporation and limited partnership had no Florida taxable situs because their day-to-day activities and operations occurred at offices outside Florida, even though the two Florida-resident officers made some investment decisions. The residents' partnership interests were exempt, but they still had to report their corporation stock.
State
FL
Ruling
TAA 96C2-031
Tax type
Intangible Personal Property Tax
Issued
1996-03-29
Issued by
Florida Department of Revenue
Requested by
Two Florida residents who formed an out-of-state corporation and limited partnership

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1996. Ask about yours and see what current Florida tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1996
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is an official Technical Assistance Advisement of the Florida Department of Revenue, issued to a requester under section 213.22, Florida Statutes, on the facts and circumstances described in the request. The advisement's standard closing states that it binds the Department only under those facts and circumstances and that later statutory or administrative-rule changes or judicial interpretations may produce a different result. Identifying details may be redacted. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice. Consult a licensed Florida tax professional about your specific facts.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Florida found that the out-of-state corporation and limited partnership had no Florida taxable situs under the 1996 intangible-tax rules.

Two Florida residents were limited partners and officers of the corporation that served as general partner. They made some investment decisions, but partnership employees or agents outside Florida carried them out. The entities' day-to-day activities, offices, mail, books, records, and other operations were outside Florida.

The entities therefore had no Florida filing liability on the stated facts. The residents' interests in the non-SEC-registered limited partnership were exempt, but the residents still had to file and report their taxable property, including their stock in the corporation.

What this means for you

  • The Department distinguished high-level investment decisions from where day-to-day operations occurred.
  • The foreign entities' operational location prevented Florida taxable situs on these facts.
  • The partnership-interest exemption did not exempt the residents' corporation stock.

Common questions

Q: Did the corporation or partnership have to file a Florida intangible-tax return? A: No.

Q: Were the residents' limited-partnership interests taxable? A: No, because the partnership was not registered with the SEC.

Q: Did the residents still have a filing duty? A: Yes. They had to report taxable property including their corporation stock.

Citations and references

  • Fla. Stat. § 199.052 — return filing for taxable intangible property
  • Fla. Stat. § 199.042 — payment with return
  • Fla. Stat. § 199.185(1)(c) — partnership-interest exemption
  • Fla. Stat. § 213.22 — Technical Assistance Advisements

Source

Original ruling text

Mar 29, 1996

Re: Technical Assistance Advisement 96(C)2-031 Intangible Tax; Taxable Situs XXX (Individual A) XXX (Individual B) XXX (Partnership) XXX (Corporation)

Dear :

Your letter of January 25, 1996, requesting a Technical Assistance Advisement on the taxability of a non-Florida partnership, having its principal place of business in the state of its creation, has been received and examined by this office. The scenario presented for consideration is summarized below:

FACTS

Individuals A and B established Corporation. Individual A, Individual B and Corporation formed Partnership in a state other than Florida. Corporation is the sole general partner of Partnership. Individuals A & B are the limited partners. The limited partners are both residents of Florida. Corporation was incorporated in a state other than Florida. Partnership maintains an office in the state of its creation where it receives mail and maintains its books and records. Partnership will send copies of its mail to Individuals A and B.

Individuals A and B do not conduct the day-to-day activities of the Partnership. However, Individuals A and B, as officers of Corporation (the general partner of the Partnership), will make certain investment decisions for the Partnership. These decisions will be effected by agents or employees of the Partnership located outside the State of Florida. All other operations of Corporation and Partnership will be accomplished at each entity's office outside Florida.

REQUESTED ADVISEMENT

Based upon the information above, you have requested technical advice on the following statements:

1.) Neither the Corporation nor the Partnership is commercially domiciled in Florida, and, accordingly, neither the Corporation nor the Partnership shall be required to file a Florida annual intangible tax return. 2.) The partnership interests in the Partnership owned by Individual A and Individual B are exempt from Florida intangible personal property tax.

LAW & CONCLUSION

Based upon the information provided, Corporation and the Partnership have no taxable situs in Florida. Though Individual A and Individual B make certain investment decisions as the officers of Corporation, which in turn makes investments as the general partner of Partnership, the day-to-day activities of the Corporation and the Partnership are conducted at their principal places of business located outside Florida.

Section 199.052, F.S., requires that every resident of this state that owns intangible property shall file a return and list all taxable intangible property owned by the resident. The payment of tax must accompany the return when filed. (See s. 199.042, F.S.) Individual A and Individual B, both residents of Florida, must file an intangible tax return and list all taxable intangible property owned by them, including the stock of Corporation.

As for Individual A's and Individual B's interest in the Partnership, there is no intangible tax due on this interest. Only an interest as a limited partner in a limited partnership, registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), is subject to tax. Limited partnership interests in limited partnerships not registered with the SEC are exempt from the intangible tax. (See s. 199.185(1)(c), F.S.)

In summary, Corporation and Partnership are not subject to the intangible tax. Individual A and Individual B are required

to report the stock they own of Corporation. Individual A's and Individuals B's interest in Partnership is not subject to the intangible tax.

This response constitutes a Technical Assistance Advisement under s. 213.22, F.S., which is binding on the Department only under the facts and circumstances described in the request for this advice as specified in s. 213.22, F.S. Our response is predicated on those facts and the specific situation summarized above. You are advised that subsequent statutory or administrative rule changes or judicial interpretations of the statutes or rules upon which this advice is based may subject similar future transactions to a different treatment than expressed in this response.

You are further advised that this response and your request are public records under Chapter 119, F.S., which are subject to disclosure to the public under the conditions of s. 213.22, F.S. Your name, address, and any other details which might lead to identification of the taxpayer must be deleted by the Department before disclosure. In an effort to protect the confidentiality of such information, we request you notify the undersigned in writing within 15 days of any deletions you wish made to the request or the response.

Sincerely,

Moses O. Daramola
Senior Tax Specialist
Tax Policy & Dispute Resolution
Office of General Counsel

MOD/md

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1996. Ezel checks current Florida tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace