FL TAA 96C2-025 Intangible Personal Property Tax 1996-03-01

Under Florida's 1996 intangible tax, did a seller's later Florida domicile make receivables previously sold to an out-of-state subsidiary taxable?

Short answer: No. Receivables owned on January 1 by an out-of-state subsidiary without Florida situs were not taxable, even if the seller later became commercially domiciled in Florida. Ministerial servicing and a later sale back did not change the result, and the note was eliminated on a consolidated return.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1996. Ezel answers yours, under current Florida tax law, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1996
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is an official Technical Assistance Advisement of the Florida Department of Revenue, issued to a requester under section 213.22, Florida Statutes, on the facts and circumstances described in the request. The advisement's standard closing states that it binds the Department only under those facts and circumstances and that later statutory or administrative-rule changes or judicial interpretations may produce a different result. Identifying details may be redacted. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice. Consult a licensed Florida tax professional about your specific facts.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Florida did not tax receivables owned on January 1 by an out-of-state subsidiary that had no Florida business situs.

The seller transacted business in Florida but was initially domiciled elsewhere and expected that a mid-1996 spin-off might later give it a Florida commercial domicile. Before January 1, it planned to sell receivables at a discount for a market-rate promissory note on arm's-length terms. The buyer would remain outside Florida with no Florida business situs.

The seller could maintain records, collect and remit payments, report balances, and conduct routine customer communications for a fee, but could not settle accounts or send them for outside collection. The Department treated those activities as ministerial. Neither the seller's later Florida domicile nor a sale back after January 1 changed the assessment-date result.

The intercompany promissory note was eliminated from the intangible-tax base through the applicable consolidated return.

What this means for you

  • The buyer's January 1 domicile, situs, ownership, and control drove the receivables result.
  • A later change in the seller's commercial domicile did not retax the buyer-owned receivables.
  • Servicing had to stay ministerial.
  • The note's exclusion depended on consolidated-return treatment.

Common questions

Q: Were the buyer-owned receivables taxable on January 1?
A: No.

Q: Did the seller's later Florida commercial domicile change that result?
A: No.

Q: Did routine collection work create Florida situs?
A: No, because the listed duties were ministerial.

Q: What happened to the purchase-money note?
A: It was eliminated as an intercompany account on the consolidated return.

Citations and references

  • Fla. Stat. § 199.032 — annual intangible tax
  • Fla. Stat. § 199.052(1), (10) — control and consolidated returns
  • Fla. Stat. § 199.175 — Florida taxable situs
  • 26 U.S.C. § 355 — spin-off referenced in the facts
  • Fla. Stat. § 213.22 — Technical Assistance Advisements

Source

Original ruling text

Mar 01, 1996

Re: Technical Assistance Advisement 96(C)2-025
Intangible Personal Property Tax - Sale of Accounts
Receivable
XXX (Corporation)

XXX (Seller)
XXX (Purchaser)

Dear:

Your letter of December 21, 1995, requesting a Technical
Assistance Advisement on the sale of receivables at year end has
been received by this office. The scenario presented for

consideration is summarized below:

FACTS

Seller is incorporated and commercially domiciled outside
the State; however, it does transact business in Florida.
Pursuant to a spin-off under IRC Section 355 scheduled to occur
around June 30, 1996, the Purchaser and Seller will become
wholly owned subsidiaries of another corporate parent. While it
is likely that Seller may attain a commercial domicile in
Florida subsequent to the spin-off, Purchaser would, however,
continue to be domiciled outside Florida with no business situs

in the State.

Purchaser, a newly formed subsidiary of the Seller, is
domiciled in a state other than Florida and is not qualified to
do business in Florida nor has a business situs in the State.
Purchaser does not currently, and will not for the duration of
the proposed transaction, have any employees, agents, or
representatives of any kind in this State, other than the Seller
who may perform ministerial activities (both in Florida and out-

of-state) at the discretion of Purchaser.

Purchaser and Seller are currently wholly-owned

subsidiaries of Corporation. Corporation is a non-Florida

corporation and will not be involved in the proposed

transaction.

Prior to January 1, Seller is contemplating the sale of all
or a part of its accounts receivable to Purchaser. The
receivables will be sold at a discounted value in exchange for a
promissory note which will bear a market rate of interest and

will otherwise reflect arm's-length terms and conditions.

Purchaser will enter into a service agreement with Seller

whereby the latter will provide the following services:

  • Identifying the receivables which are sold, as such,
    in their accounting records.

  • Ensuring that the sold receivables are in compliance
    with any credit and collection policies of the
    Purchaser or that the receivables are not in default
    prior to purchase.

  • Maintaining the books and records necessary for the
    collection of the sold receivables (i.e., accounting
    records).

  • Reporting activities, outstanding balances, and aging
    of receivables to the Purchaser on a periodic basis
    (typically monthly).

  • Collecting the receivables (receiving payments) and
    accounting for same.

  • Remitting proceeds to Purchaser.

  • Routine communications with the customer regarding
    late payments.

  • Routine communications with the customer regarding
    credit problems.

  • Notifying the Purchaser of uncollected accounts.

  • Sending routine form reminder notices to customers for

late payments.

The agreement will be based on arm's-length terms and
conditions and Seller will be paid a fee for providing the
services listed above. The Seller shall be restricted to the
ministerial type functions outlined above and will not have
authority to: (1) compromise or settle any account; or (2) refer

any account to an outside collection agency, attorney or other

person for collection. Only Purchaser shall be responsible for

performing such restricted activities.

Corporation will file a Florida consolidated intangible tax
return which will include both Purchaser and Seller for the
current year. However, effective January 1, 1997, Purchaser and
Seller would join in a consolidated Florida intangible tax

return with the new parent.

DISCUSSION AND LAW

Section 199.052(1), F.S., requires that every person
domiciled in this state that owns, manages or controls
intangible property having a business situs in the state, must
file an intangible tax return. Section 199.175, F.S., states
that intangible property shall have a taxable situs in this
state when it is owned by a person domiciled in this state or it
arose out of business transacted in this state by employees,
agents or representatives of any kind from a location within

this state or with customers in this state.

For purposes of the annual tax imposed under s. 199.032,
F.S., intangible personal property shall have a taxable situs in
Florida when it is owned, managed, or controlled by any person
domiciled in this State on January 1 of the tax year, as
provided in s. 199.175, F.S. "Any person domiciled in this
state" means: (a) any natural person who is a legal resident of
this State; (b) any bank or financial institution, company,
corporation, partnership, or other artificial entity organized
or created under the laws of this State, except a trust; or (c)
any person, including a trust, who has established a commercial
domicile in this State. A business or other artificial entity
acquires its commercial domicile in Florida when it maintains
its chief or principal office in this State where executive or
management functions are performed or where the course of

business operations is determined.

Intangible personal property shall have a taxable situs in
Florida when it is deemed to have a business situs in this State
and it is owned, managed, or controlled by a person transacting

business in this State, even though the owner may claim domicile

elsewhere. Intangibles shall be deemed to have a Florida
business situs when they receive the benefit and protection of
Florida laws and courts and they are derived from, arise out of,
or are issued in connection with business transacted in this

State with a customer in this State.

REQUESTED ADVISEMENT

Based upon the scenario presented above you have requested

technical advice on the following statements:

  1. The receivables sold by Seller to Purchaser prior to
    January 1, 1996, and owned by Purchaser on January 1, 1996, are
    not subject to the intangible personal property tax levied
    pursuant to s. 199.032, F.S., since Purchaser has neither a
    business situs nor is commercially domiciled in Florida.

  2. Should Seller obtain a commercial domicile in Florida
    during 1996, the receivables sold by Seller to Purchaser prior
    to January 1, 1996, or other receivables sold prior to January 1
    of a subsequent year and owned by Purchaser on January 1 of any
    year, would not be subject to the intangible personal property
    tax levied pursuant to section 199.032, F.S., since the
    Purchaser would at no time have a business situs or be
    commercially domiciled in Florida.

  3. The performance of ministerial functions by the Seller
    on behalf of the Purchaser will not establish a taxable situs in
    Florida for the sold receivables. Similarly, no tax with
    respect to the sold receivables will be due if the ministerial
    functions are performed by the Purchaser from its location
    outside Florida.

  4. The sale of receivables back to the Seller after
    January 1, 1996, will not affect the tax treatment of the
    receivables on January 1, 1996, prior to the transfer.

  5. The sale back of some or all of the receivables that
    may be "put" back to the Seller after January 1 will not change
    the tax treatment of the receivables on January 1 for the reason
    set forth in 3, above.

  6. The activities of the Seller as outlined above,
    constitute ministerial functions or processing activities
    permissible under s. 199.052, F.S.

  7. The promissory notes held by the Seller received from

the Purchaser on the sale of the receivables would be eliminated
from the taxable intangible base as an intercompany account by
the filing of a consolidated return in conformity with section
199.052(10), F.S.

CONCLUSION

Based upon statutory provisions and the information
provided in your request, each of the seven requested

advisements is answered in the affirmative.

This response constitutes a Technical Assistance Advisement
under s. 213.22, F.S., which is binding on the Department only
under the facts and circumstances described in the request for
this advice as specified in s. 213.22, F.S. Our response is
predicated on those facts and the specific situation summarized
above. You are advised that subsequent statutory or
administrative rule changes or judicial interpretations of the
statutes or rules upon which this advice is based may subject
similar future transactions to a different treatment than

expressed in this response.

You are further advised that this response and your request
are public records under Chapter 119, F.S., which are subject to
disclosure to the public under the conditions of s. 213.22, F.S.
Your name, address, and any other details which might lead to
identification of the taxpayer must be deleted by the Department
before disclosure. In an effort to protect the confidentiality
of such information, we request you notify the undersigned in
writing within 15 days of any deletions you wish made to the

request or the response.
Sincerely,
Moses O. Daramola
Senior Tax Specialist
Tax Policy & Dispute Resolution

Office of General Counsel

MOD/md

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 1996 ruling on this question. Ezel checks current Florida tax law and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.