FL TAA 96C2-017 Intangible Personal Property Tax 1996-02-22

Under Florida's 1996 intangible tax, did loan transfers, Florida servicing, or recourse give Delaware bank subsidiaries Florida nexus?

Short answer: No. The Delaware subsidiaries had no Florida nexus, and the transferred loans had no Florida taxable situs. The transfer form, ministerial servicing by Florida regional banks, and recourse rights did not change that conclusion on the stated facts.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1996. Ezel answers yours, under current Florida tax law, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1996
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is an official Technical Assistance Advisement of the Florida Department of Revenue, issued to a requester under section 213.22, Florida Statutes, on the facts and circumstances described in the request. The advisement's standard closing states that it binds the Department only under those facts and circumstances and that later statutory or administrative-rule changes or judicial interpretations may produce a different result. Identifying details may be redacted. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice. Consult a licensed Florida tax professional about your specific facts.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Florida found no Florida nexus for Delaware bank subsidiaries that received loan interests before year-end.

Florida regional banks transferred intangible property to their respective Delaware subsidiaries for promissory notes, then continued collecting principal and interest, processing payments, accounting, and keeping records. The regional banks had no discretionary authority, management, or control over the transferred loans.

The Department answered all four questions no: the subsidiaries had no Florida nexus, the transfer form did not create nexus, ministerial Florida servicing did not create nexus or taxable situs, and recourse to the regional banks did not create taxable situs. A reassignment after January 2 did not alter the stated January 1 structure.

What this means for you

  • The Delaware entities had no Florida assets, agents, employees, or representatives.
  • Servicing stayed limited to ministerial loan functions.
  • Recourse and the participation-agreement form did not create situs on these facts.

Common questions

Q: Did the Delaware subsidiaries have Florida nexus?
A: No.

Q: Did Florida loan servicing create nexus?
A: No, because it was ministerial and excluded discretion, management, and control.

Q: Did recourse to the regional banks create taxable situs?
A: No.

Citations and references

  • Fla. Stat. § 199.032 — annual intangible tax
  • Fla. Stat. § 199.175 — Florida taxable situs
  • Fla. Stat. § 213.22 — Technical Assistance Advisements

Source

Original ruling text

Feb 22, 1996

Re: TAA 96(C)2-017
Florida Intangible Tax - Taxable Situs
XXX ("Parent")
XXX ("Sub")
XXX Florida Subsidiaries ("Regional Banks")
XXX ("Delaware Subsidiaries")

Dear :

Your letter of December 6, 1995, requested a Technical
Assistance Advisement on the application of the intangible tax
to the above referenced matter. This response to your request
constitutes a Technical Assistance Advisement under Chapter
12-11, Florida Administrative Code, and is issued to you under
the authority of s. 213.22, Florida Statutes.

Discussion Of Facts and Circumstances

Parent is a Non-Florida bank holding company and the parent of
several other bank holding companies. Parent files a
consolidated Florida intangible tax return.

Sub is domiciled and organized under the laws of Florida. It is
the parent of numerous Regional Banks located in Florida. Some
Regional Banks own or will own a Delaware subsidiary organized
under the laws of Delaware.

It is contemplated that a transfer of intangible property from
certain Regional Banks to their respective Delaware
Subsidiaries, evidenced by a Master Participation Agreement,
will be made in exchange for a promissory note prior to or on
December 31. The Regional Banks will execute a servicing
agreement allowing them to perform certain ministerial functions
regarding the maintenance of the transferred intangible
property. On or after January 2, an Assignment Agreement will
be executed which will provide for the reassignment of the
intangible property to the respective Regional Bank from their

respective Delaware Subsidiary in exchange for the cancellation
of the original promissory note. Parent will file a
consolidated intangible tax return for the year and will
eliminate the intercompany receivables created by the original
transfer.

The Delaware Subsidiaries will not have any business assets,
agent, employee, or representative of any kind in Florida.

Each Regional Bank will perform ministerial activities for its
respective Delaware Subsidiary and will have no discretionary
authority, management or control regarding any of the loans
transferred to and owned by the Delaware Subsidiary. At the
discretion of the Delaware Subsidiaries, the Regional Banks will
continue to perform loan servicing functions, limited to
collection of principal and interest, processing, accounting,
and record-keeping related to the loans.

Questions Presented

  1. Do the Delaware Subsidiaries have Florida nexus?
  2. Does the form of loan transfer create Florida nexus for the
    Delaware Subsidiaries?
  3. Do the rights and responsibilities bestowed upon the
    Regional Banks under the terms of the Servicing Agreement,
    with respect to maintenance of the intangible property,
    create either a Florida nexus for the Delaware Subsidiaries
    or a Florida taxable situs for the intangible property
    itself?
  4. Does the fact that the loans are transferred to a Delaware
    Subsidiary with the right of recourse to the parent
    Regional Bank create Florida taxable situs for the
    intangible personal property?

Discussion and Law

For purposes of the annual tax imposed under s. 199.032, F.S.,
intangible personal property shall have a taxable situs in this
state when it is owned, managed, or controlled by any person
domiciled in this state on January 1 of the tax year, as
provided in s. 199.175, F.S. Further, intangible personal

property has taxable situs in this state when it is deemed to
have business situs in Florida and it is owned, managed, or
controlled by a person transacting business in this state, even
though the owner may claim domicile elsewhere. Intangibles
shall be deemed to have business situs in Florida when they
receive the benefit and protection of Florida laws and courts
and they are derived from, arise out of, or are issued in
connection with business transacted in this state with a
customer in this state.

Conclusion

Based upon statutory provisions and the information provided in
your request, each question presented is answered in the
negative.

This response constitutes a Technical Assistance Advisement
under s. 213.22, F.S., which is binding on the Department only
under the facts and circumstances described in the request for
this advice as specified in s. 213.22, F.S. Our response is
based on those facts and the specific situation summarized
above. You are advised that subsequent statutory or
administrative rule changes or judicial interpretations of the
statutes or rules upon which this advice is based may subject
similar future transactions to a different treatment than
expressed in this response.

You are further advised that this response and your request are
public records under Chapter 119, F.S., which are subject to
disclosure to the public under the conditions of s. 213.22, F.S.
Your name, address, and any other details which might lead to
identification of the taxpayer must be deleted by the Department
before disclosure. In an effort to protect the confidentiality
of such information, we request you notify the undersigned in
writing within 15 days of any deletions you wish made to the
request or the response.

Sincerely,

Val Poliuto
Statutory Compliance Section

Control #24167
VJP/kk
Enclosure (Not included in TLL)

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 1996 ruling on this question. Ezel checks current Florida tax law and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.