Under Florida's 1996 intangible tax, were loans participated before January 1 to Delaware bank subsidiaries taxable?

Short answer No. Loans owned on January 1 by Delaware subsidiaries without Florida situs were not taxable, and the Florida banks' ministerial servicing did not create control. The purchase-money notes were taxable to the Florida banks but were eliminated from the consolidated return.
State
FL
Ruling
TAA 96C2-016
Tax type
Intangible Personal Property Tax
Issued
1996-02-13
Issued by
Florida Department of Revenue
Requested by
Bank holding group participating loans to Delaware subsidiaries

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1996. Ask about yours and see what current Florida tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1996
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is an official Technical Assistance Advisement of the Florida Department of Revenue, issued to a requester under section 213.22, Florida Statutes, on the facts and circumstances described in the request. The advisement's standard closing states that it binds the Department only under those facts and circumstances and that later statutory or administrative-rule changes or judicial interpretations may produce a different result. Identifying details may be redacted. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice. Consult a licensed Florida tax professional about your specific facts.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Florida did not tax loan participations owned on January 1 by Delaware banking subsidiaries with no Florida taxable situs.

Florida regional banks sold participations at book value for promissory notes and continued servicing under agreements that gave them no discretion, management, or control. The Delaware subsidiaries retained the income, expense liability, ownership risk, control, and management.

The regional banks therefore did not owe tax on the transferred loans either. Their promissory notes were taxable because the banks were Florida-domiciled, but including the banks in the parent's consolidated intangible-tax return eliminated those notes from the taxable base.

What this means for you

  • The Delaware subsidiaries' lack of Florida situs kept the loan interests outside the tax.
  • Ministerial servicing did not restore ownership or control to the regional banks.
  • The promissory notes were taxable before the consolidated-return elimination.

Common questions

Q: Were the Delaware subsidiaries' loan participations taxable? A: No.

Q: Did the Florida regional banks owe tax on the transferred loans? A: No.

Q: Were the promissory notes taxable? A: Yes to the Florida banks, but the consolidated return eliminated them from the group's taxable base.

Citations and references

  • Fla. Stat. § 199.052 — January 1 ownership, management, or control
  • Fla. Stat. § 199.175 — Florida taxable situs
  • Fla. Stat. § 213.22 — Technical Assistance Advisements

Source

Original ruling text

Feb 13, 1996

Re: Technical Assistance Advisement 96(C)2-016 Intangible Tax - Property Subject To Tax XXX (Parent) XXX (Bank)

Dear :

This letter is in response to your request for a Technical Assistance Advisement for the referenced corporations.

Statement of Facts

Parent is organized under the laws of a state other than Florida and is domiciled in that state. Bank is directly owned by Parent. Bank is organized under the laws of the State of Florida. Bank owns several regional banks that are located in Florida. Parent, Bank and the regional banks are part of a federal consolidated group and file a consolidated Florida intangible tax return.

Several of the regional banks own subsidiaries organized under the laws of Delaware. Each of the Delaware subsidiaries are commercially domiciled and maintain offices in Delaware. As financial institutions, the regional banks originate loans of various types. The loans originated by the regional banks may be participated from the regional banks to the Delaware subsidiaries. The loans to be participated may include, but are not limited to, commercial loans not secured by real estate, floor plan loans, installment loans, consumer loans, acceptances, and the interest receivables and unearned interest related to these loans (collectively referred to as "Loans").

The regional banks will sell a participation in all or a portion of the Loans to their respective subsidiaries prior to or as of the close of business on December 31 of each year. The Loans will be participated at book value in exchange for a promissory note. Each regional bank will contract with its

Delaware subsidiary to perform ministerial duties under the terms of a Servicing Agreement. The regional banks will have no discretionary authority, management or control with regard to any of the Loans owned by a Delaware subsidiary. The regional banks will continue to perform, at the discretion of the Delaware subsidiaries, the terms of the Servicing Agreement. At any time after January 1 of the following year, each Delaware subsidiary may sell back to its regional bank the loans acquired under the Master Participation Agreement in satisfaction of the promissory note.

Statutory Provisions

Section 199.052, F.S., states that every person who, on January 1 of each tax year, owns, manages or controls intangible property having a taxable situs in this State is required to file an intangible tax return. Section 199.175, F.S., provides that every person that has a legal or commercial domicile in this State on January 1 of the tax year has a taxable situs in the this State. This section also provides a taxable situs for intangible property, owned by a nondomiciliary, that results from business conducted by employees, agents or representatives of any kind in this State.

Issues

Based upon the documentation provided and the discussion above the following issues have been raised:

  1. Will the Loans participated to the Delaware subsidiaries
    before January 1 be subject to the Florida intangible tax?

  2. Will the regional banks be subject to the Florida
    intangible tax on the Loans they participate to their Delaware subsidiaries prior to January 1 and which are owned by the Delaware Subsidiaries on January 1?

  3. If the regional banks and the Delaware subsidiaries are
    included in the Parent's consolidated intangible tax return, will the promissory notes from the Delaware subsidiaries to the regional banks be excluded from the

taxable base on the Parent's consolidated intangible tax return?

Discussion of Law

Issue 1. The Loans participated to the Delaware subsidiaries from the regional banks are not subject to the intangible tax in Florida. The Delaware subsidiaries have no taxable situs in Florida. The services performed by the regional banks on behalf of the Delaware Subsidiaries are ministerial and do not rise to management or control. Therefore, none of the Loans participated to the Delaware subsidiaries are subject to Florida's intangible tax.

Issue 2. The regional banks do not have a tax liability for the Loans they participate to the Delaware subsidiaries prior to January 1. The regional banks will not own, manage or control the Loans on January 1. All income, expense liability, risk of ownership, control and management associated with the Loans is retained by the Delaware subsidiaries. Therefore, the regional banks will have no tax liability for the Loans participated to the Delaware Subsidiaries.

Issue 3. The promissory notes acquired by the regional banks are subject to the intangible tax since the regional banks are domiciled in Florida. However, the filing of a consolidated intangible tax return by Parent that includes the regional banks would eliminate the promissory notes from the taxable base of the Parent's consolidated tax return.

This response constitutes a Technical Assistance Advisement under s. 213.22, F.S., which is binding on the Department only under the facts and circumstances described in the request for this advice as specified in s. 213.22, F.S. Our response is predicated on those facts and the specific situation summarized above. You are advised that subsequent statutory or administrative rule changes or judicial interpretations of the statutes or rules upon which this advice is based may subject similar future transactions to a different treatment than expressed in this response.

You are further advised that this response and your request are public records under Chapter 119, F.S., which are subject to disclosure to the public under the conditions of s. 213.22, F.S. Your name, address, and any other details which might lead to identification of the taxpayer must be deleted by the Department before disclosure. In an effort to protect the confidentiality of such information, we request you notify the undersigned in writing within 15 days of any deletions you wish made to the request or the response.

Sincerely,

J.V. Parramore. Jr.
Tax Law Specialist
Tax Policy and Dispute Resolution
Office of General Counsel

JVP/mh

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1996. Ezel checks current Florida tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace