FL TAA 96C2-012 Intangible Personal Property Tax 1996-02-02

Under Florida's 1996 intangible tax, were receivables sold before January 1 by a Florida-office parent to an out-of-state subsidiary taxable?

Short answer: No. The out-of-state subsidiary owned, managed, and controlled the receivables outside Florida on January 1 and had no Florida office, assets, employees, agents, or representatives. The parent's servicing and a possible post-January 2 put-back did not change the stated result.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1996. Ezel answers yours, under current Florida tax law, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1996
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is an official Technical Assistance Advisement of the Florida Department of Revenue, issued to a requester under section 213.22, Florida Statutes, on the facts and circumstances described in the request. The advisement's standard closing states that it binds the Department only under those facts and circumstances and that later statutory or administrative-rule changes or judicial interpretations may produce a different result. Identifying details may be redacted. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice. Consult a licensed Florida tax professional about your specific facts.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Florida found no intangible-tax liability for receivables sold before January 1 to an out-of-state subsidiary that managed and controlled them outside Florida.

The parent maintained its principal office in Florida, but the purchaser had no Florida organization, commercial domicile, office, business assets, agents, employees, or representatives. The sale occurred at face value for a promissory note executed and delivered outside Florida.

The parent continued the listed recordkeeping, collection, remittance, reporting, and routine customer communications under an arm's-length servicing agreement. The subsidiary could put receivables back after January 2 for cancellation of the note, but the Department still approved the requested no-liability result.

What this means for you

  • The purchaser's January 1 ownership, management, and control occurred outside Florida.
  • The subsidiary had no Florida business presence.
  • Routine servicing and a later put-back did not change the approved result.

Common questions

Q: Were the sold receivables taxable?
A: No.

Q: Did the parent's Florida office create situs for the buyer?
A: No, on the stated facts.

Q: Did the later put-back right change the result?
A: No.

Citations and references

  • Fla. Stat. § 199.032 — annual intangible tax
  • Fla. Stat. § 199.175 — Florida taxable situs
  • Fla. Stat. § 213.22 — Technical Assistance Advisements

Source

Original ruling text

Feb 02, 1996

RE: TAA 96(C)2-012
Florida Intangible Tax - Taxable Situs
XXX ("Seller"),
XXX ("Purchaser")

Dear:

Your letter of December 27, 1995, requested a Technical
Assistance Advisement on the application of intangible tax on
the above referenced matter. This response to your request
constitutes a Technical Assistance Advisement under Chapter
12-11, Florida Administrative Code, and is issued to you under

the authority of s. 213.22, Florida Statutes.

Facts

Seller is the parent company of Purchaser. Seller maintains its
principal office in Florida but is not organized under the laws

of Florida. Purchaser is not organized under the laws of
Florida, not commercially domiciled in Florida, and does not
maintain an office in Florida. Also, Purchaser does not have
any business assets, agent, employee, or representative of any

kind in Florida.

On December 22, 1995, Seller sold certain accounts receivable to
Purchaser, evidenced by an intangible property transfer
agreement. The receivables were sold at face value in exchange
for a promissory note. The transfer agreement and note were
executed and delivered outside of Florida. Purchaser will
manage and control the receivables from its office outside of

Florida.

Seller will enter into a service agreement with Purchaser to

provide the following services:

  • Identifying all sold receivables as sold in their

accounting records.

  • Ensuring that receivables that are sold are in
    compliance with any credit and collection policies of
    the Purchaser or that the receivables are not in
    default.

  • Maintaining the books and records necessary for the
    collection of the sold receivables (i.e., accounting
    records).

  • Reporting activities, outstanding balances, and aging
    of receivables to Purchaser on a periodic basis
    (typically monthly).

  • Collecting the receivables (receiving payments) and
    accounting for same.

  • Remitting proceeds to the Purchaser.

  • Routine communications with the obligator regarding
    late payments.

  • Routine communications with the obligator regarding
    credit problems.

  • Notifying the Purchaser of uncollected accounts.

  • Sending routine reminder notices to obligators for

late payments.

A servicing agreement, based on arm's length terms and

conditions, has been established between Purchaser and Seller.

After January 2, 1996, Purchaser may put back some or all of the
receivables to Seller in consideration for cancellation of the
note. Purchaser will be included in the Seller's consolidated

Florida Intangible Tax Return.

Requested Advisement

That there will be no Florida intangible tax liability on the

receivables which were sold to Purchaser.

Discussion and Law

For purposes of the annual tax imposed under s. 199.032, F.S.,
intangible personal property shall have a taxable situs in this
state when it is owned, managed, or controlled by any person
domiciled in this state on January 1 of the tax year, as

provided in s. 199.175, F.S. Further, intangible personal

property has taxable situs in this state when it is deemed to
have business situs in Florida and it is owned, managed, or
controlled by a person transacting business in this state, even
though the owner may claim domicile elsewhere. Intangibles
shall be deemed to have business situs in Florida when they
receive the benefit and protection of Florida laws and courts
and they are derived from, arise out of, or are issued in
connection with business transacted in this state with a

customer in this state.

Conclusion

Based upon statutory provisions and the information provided in
your request, the requested advisement is answered in the

affirmative.

This response constitutes a Technical Assistance Advisement
under s. 213.22, F.S., which is binding on the Department only
under the facts and circumstances described in the request for
this advice as specified in s. 213.22, F.S. Our response is
based on those facts and the specific situation summarized
above. You are advised that subsequent statutory or
administrative rule changes or judicial interpretations of the
statutes or rules upon which this advice is based may subject
similar future transactions to a different treatment than

expressed in this response.

You are further advised that this response and your request are
public records under Chapter 119, F.S., which are subject to
disclosure to the public under the conditions of s. 213.22, F.S.
Your name, address, and any other details which might lead to
identification of the taxpayer must be deleted by the Department
before disclosure. In an effort to protect the confidentiality

of such information, we will follow the instructions in your

statement of proposed deletions.

Sincerely,

Val Poliuto

Statutory Compliance Section

Control #24317
VIP/kk

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 1996 ruling on this question. Ezel checks current Florida tax law and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.