FL TAA 96C2-003 Intangible Personal Property Tax 1996-01-17

Under Florida's 1996 intangible tax, were receivables contributed before January 1 to an out-of-state partnership taxable?

Short answer: No. The out-of-state partnership's January 1 receivables were not taxable when it had no Florida connection beyond debtors, and the Florida partnership's ownership interest was exempt. Routine servicing was ministerial, but decision-making customer communications could make the receivables taxable.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1996. Ezel answers yours, under current Florida tax law, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1996
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is an official Florida Technical Assistance Advisement applying the 1996 intangible-tax statutes to the redacted limited partnership's annual receivables contributions, partnership interest, post-January 1 distributions, and servicing agreement. Under section 213.22, it binds the Department only for those facts. Different ownership, timing, Florida contacts, communications, decision-making authority, services, or later law could change the result.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Receivables contributed before January 1 to the out-of-state general partnership were not subject to Florida intangible tax on the stated facts. The general partnership was domiciled outside Florida and had no Florida employees, agents, or representatives. A Florida debtor, by itself, did not give the receivable Florida tax situs, even when the receivable originally arose from Florida business activity.

Returning the receivables to the Florida limited partnership after January 1 did not change their treatment on the January 1 assessment date. The limited partnership's ownership interest in the general partnership was also exempt under the cited statute.

The servicing arrangement required caution. Bookkeeping, reporting, collecting payments, remitting proceeds, and routine late-payment notices were generally ministerial. Customer communications involving decisions, however, would cause the receivables to remain subject to Florida tax.

What this means for you

The ruling turned on who owned, managed, and controlled the receivables on January 1 and whether Florida servicing stayed ministerial. A nominal transfer would not protect receivables if the Florida business kept substantive collection decisions.

Common questions

Q: Were the out-of-state partnership's January 1 receivables taxable?
A: No, under the stated domicile, ownership, management, and Florida-contact facts.

Q: Did original Florida business situs follow the receivables?
A: No. A Florida debtor alone was not enough once the unrelated Florida connections described were absent.

Q: Did a distribution back after January 1 change the result?
A: No.

Q: Could the Florida partnership service the receivables?
A: Yes, if it stayed within ministerial tasks; decision-making customer communications would change the result.

Citations and references

  • Fla. Stat. § 199.052(1) — return requirement for Florida-situs intangible property
  • Fla. Stat. § 199.175 — domicile and business situs
  • Fla. Stat. § 199.185(1)(c) — partnership interests
  • Fla. Stat. § 213.22 — Technical Assistance Advisements

Source

Original ruling text

Jan 17, 1996

Re: Technical Assistance Advisement 96(C)2-003
Intangible Tax - Property Subject to Tax - Accounts
Receivable
Sections 199.052 and 199.175, F.S.
XXX (Limited Partnership)

Dear :

Your letter requesting a Technical Assistance Advisement
has been referred to this office for response. Your request is
based upon the following statements:

Limited Partnership is commercially domiciled in Florida
and owns accounts receivable that arose from sales of
products to customers both in and out of Florida. Limited
Partnership will form a general partnership under the laws
of a state other than Florida. The general partnership
will be domiciled in the state of organization. The
general partnership will be capitalized by a minimal cash
contribution. The general partnership will have no
employees, agents or representatives of any kind in
Florida. On or before December 31 of each year Limited
Partnership will transfer ownership of its accounts
receivable to the general partnership as a contribution to
capital. Appropriate entries will be made to remove the
accounts receivable and record the equity investment in the
general partnership on Limited Partnership's books.
Management and control of the receivables will rest with
the general partnership during the time that the general
partnership owns the receivables. Shortly after January 2
of each year some or all of the accounts receivable will be
transferred back to Limited Partnership as a partnership
distribution.

Limited Partnership will enter into a service agreement
with the general partnership whereby Limited Partnership
will perform ministerial duties at the direction of the

general partnership. Limited Partnership will be paid a
fee for performing this service. The service agreement
could be terminated by either party upon notification to
the other party. The ministerial duties will include the
following:

*

Maintaining the books and records necessary for the
collection of the accounts receivable.

*

Reporting activities, outstanding balances, and aging
of Receivables to the general partnership on a
periodic basis.

*

Collecting the payments on the accounts receivable and
accounting for the same.

*

Remitting proceeds to the general partnership.

*

Routine communications with the customers regarding
late payments.

*

Routine communications with customers regarding credit
problems.

*

Sending routine form reminder notices to customers for
late payments.

Provisions of Law

Section 199.052(1), F.S., requires that every person who
owns, manages or controls intangible personal property having a
taxable situs in this state must file a return. Section
199.175, F.S., provides that taxable situs is established when a
person is legally or commercially domiciled in Florida.
Therefore, a person domiciled in Florida who owns, manages or
controls intangible property is subject to tax on all their
taxable intangible property. This section also requires that
persons conducting business through employees, agents or
representatives of any kind from their business location or at
the customer's location in this state pay an intangible tax on
the intangible property arising out of the business activity.

Requested Advisement

Based upon the transaction described above several
questions have been posed with regard to the taxation of the
accounts receivable and Limited Partnership. These questions

are:

  1. Are the receivables which are transferred to the
    general partnership by Limited Partnership and owned,
    controlled and managed by the general partnership on
    January 1 subject to the Florida Intangible Personal
    Property Tax?
  2. If the accounts receivable contributed to the general
    partnership include accounts receivable which
    originally had Florida business situs, will such
    receivables be subject to the Florida Intangible
    Personal Property Tax?
  3. If the assets are transferred back to Limited
    Partnership after January 1 does this affect the tax
    treatment of the assets on January 1?
  4. Will the investment in the general partnership be
    included in Limited Partnership's intangible tax base?
  5. Do the activities listed above, which are services to
    be provided by Limited Partnership for the general
    partnership, subject the assets to the intangible tax?
    If so, which of the activities would be deemed to
    exceed the ministerial functions or processing
    activities contemplated in s. 199.052(1), F.S.

Response to Requested Advisement

Response to advisement 1. Every person that is domiciled
in Florida on January 1 must pay an intangible tax on all their
taxable intangible property. Based upon the information
contained in your correspondence the general partnership is a
non-Florida entity. Therefore, as the owner of the accounts
receivable on January 1 the general partnership would have no
intangible tax liability for the accounts receivable purchased
from Limited Partnership.

Response to advisement 2. Intangible property which arose
from business activity in Florida, owned by a person having no
connection with Florida, other than a debtor present in the
State, is not subject to Florida's intangible personal property
tax. (Also see response to advisement 1.)

Response to advisement 3. If Limited Partnership purchases
the accounts receivable or they are returned as a partnership
distribution after January 1, it will not affect the taxability
of the receivables on January 1.

Response to advisement 4. Limited Partnership's interest
in the general partnership is not subject to Florida's
intangible tax. (See s. 199.185(1)(c), F.S.)

Response to advisement 5. The activities described
generally constitute ministerial functions. However, the
communication with customers should be approached with caution.
Communications between Limited Partnership and the customers,
during the period the receivables are owned by the general
partnership, should be limited to such things as reminder
notices and notices of late payment. Other activities which
involve decision making will cause the accounts receivable to
remain subject to the intangible tax.

This response constitutes a Technical Assistance Advisement
under s. 213.22, F.S., which is binding on the Department only
under the facts and circumstances described in the request for
this advice as specified in s. 213.22, F.S. Our response is
predicated on those facts and the specific situation summarized
above. You are advised that subsequent statutory or
administrative rule changes or judicial interpretations of the
statutes or rules upon which this advice is based may subject
similar future transactions to a different treatment than
expressed in this response.

You are further advised that this response and your request
are public records under Chapter 119, F.S., which are subject to
disclosure to the public under the conditions of s. 213.22, F.S.
Your name, address, and any other details which might lead to
identification of the taxpayer must be deleted by the Department
before disclosure. In an effort to protect the confidentiality
of such information, we request you notify the undersigned in
writing within 15 days of any deletions you wish made to the
request or the response.

Sincerely,

J.V. Parramore. Jr.
Tax Law Specialist
Tax Policy and Dispute Resolution
Office of General Counsel
JVP/mh

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 1996 ruling on this question. Ezel checks current Florida tax law and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.