Were the original mortgage tax legends sufficient, and was a consolidation and renewal note exempt from additional Florida documentary stamp tax?

Short answer Yes. Florida agreed that documentary stamp tax had been properly paid on the original mortgages and that their legends adequately documented payment. The consolidation and modification were exempt renewals because they continued existing taxed obligations without increasing principal, used the original obligors, and satisfied the prior-tax conditions.
State
FL
Ruling
TAA 96B4-009
Tax type
Documentary Stamp Tax
Issued
1996-06-21
Issued by
Florida Department of Revenue
Requested by
Mortgagor and lenders consolidating previously taxed notes and mortgages

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1996. Ask about yours and see what current Florida tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1996
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is an official Technical Assistance Advisement of the Florida Department of Revenue, issued to a requester under section 213.22, Florida Statutes, on the facts and circumstances described in the request. The advisement's standard closing states that it binds the Department only under those facts and circumstances and that later statutory or administrative-rule changes or judicial interpretations may produce a different result. Identifying details may be redacted. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice. Consult a licensed Florida tax professional about your specific facts.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Florida approved the documentary stamp tax paid on the original mortgages and treated the later consolidation and modification as exempt renewals.

One original note was secured by three mortgages on separate parcels, each bearing a legend that the proper intangible and documentary stamp taxes had been paid. A second lender held separately taxed second mortgages. After the first note and mortgages were assigned, the new lender made an additional, separately taxed loan.

The mortgagor later consolidated the acquired debt and incremental debt into a single renewal note and mortgage modification. The Department found the original mortgage legends adequate and agreed that the initial documentary stamp tax had been properly paid.

The consolidation remained exempt because it continued existing obligations without enlarging their principal balances. The ruling described the renewal conditions as the same original obligors, no increase beyond unpaid principal, and proper tax payment on the original note or mortgage.

What this means for you

  • A recorded mortgage could carry the tax with a notation on the note showing where and how much tax was affixed.
  • Combining multiple taxed notes did not trigger new tax when it merely continued existing principal.
  • Adding obligors, substituting parties, or increasing principal could defeat renewal treatment.

Common questions

Q: Were the legends on the original mortgages sufficient? A: Yes.

Q: Was the consolidation note additionally taxable? A: No, because it qualified as an exempt renewal.

Q: What principal could be renewed tax-free? A: Only the unpaid principal balance, without increase, under the conditions stated in the ruling.

Citations and references

  • Fla. Stat. § 201.08(1) — documentary stamp tax on notes and mortgages
  • Fla. Stat. § 201.09 — exempt renewal conditions
  • Fla. Admin. Code r. 12B-4.053(29) — notes secured by recorded mortgages and tax notation
  • Fla. Admin. Code r. 12B-4.054(1)(a) — consolidated renewal notes
  • Fla. Stat. § 213.22 — Technical Assistance Advisements

Source

Original ruling text

Jun 21, 1996

Re: Technical Assistance Advisement No. 96(B)4-009 Documentary Stamp Tax; Proper Legend on Mortgages/Exempt Renewals of a Note and Mortgage Sections 201.08(1), and 201.09, F.S. XXX (Mortgagor) XXX (Mortgagee 1) XXX (Mortgagee 2) XXX (Mortgagee 3)

Dear :

This is in response to your recent request for a technical assistance advisement.

The following is the description of the transactions outlined in your letter:

On or about XX, the Mortgagor executed a promissory note in favor of the Mortgagee 1 in the amount of $XX which was secured by three separate mortgages on separate parcels of real property, with two of the parcels being located in XX County and the third parcel being located in XX County. A legend appears on these three mortgages stating that proper intangible and documentary stamp taxes have been paid.

At the same time, Mortgagor also executed a promissory note in favor of Mortgagee 2 in the amount of $XX which was secured by second mortgages on each of the three parcels. Proper intangible and documentary stamp taxes have been paid on these second mortgages.

On XX, Mortgagee 1 assigned its interest to the note and mortgage to Mortgagee 3. The outstanding balance at the time of the assignment was $XX. Mortgagee 3 made an additional loan to Mortgagor in the amount of $XX. Mortgagor executed an incremental promissory note

evidencing the indebtedness. The incremental note was secured by another mortgage encumbering the three parcels. Proper documentary stamp taxes were paid on this incremental note and mortgage.

Later on, Mortgagor executed a consolidation and renewal promissory note and mortgage (Modification Agreement) that consolidated the indebtedness now owned by Mortgagee 3 with the incremental note and mortgage into a single obligation totaling $XX.

Requested Ruling

  1. Whether proper amounts of documentary stamp taxes was
    paid on the three mortgages or are there additional stamp taxes payable with regard to the initial $XX loan made by the Mortgagee 1, the execution of the Mortgagee 1 note and the execution and recordation of the three Mortgagee 1 mortgages?
  2. Whether the renewal note and the modification
    agreement are exempt from further documentary stamp taxes under Fla. Stat. s. 201.09?

Discussion and Law

With respect to the requested ruling 1, pursuant to section 201.08(1), F.S., and Rule 12B-4.053(29), F.A.C., all notes or written obligations to pay money delivered to the lender, including, but not limited to, master notes, and notes drawn in connection with a line of credit, letter of credit, bail bond or otherwise, executed in Florida or approved and accepted in Florida, are subject to Florida documentary stamp tax. Tax is due based on the face amount of the note whether or not funds are advanced at the time of delivery. If the note is secured by a recorded mortgage, stamps shall be affixed to the mortgage at the time of recording and a notation made on the note that proper stamps and amount thereof are affixed to the mortgage.

With respect to the requested ruling 2, a renewal note is subject to documentary stamp tax unless it meets all of the conditions of Section 201.09, F.S.:

1. Renewal must be signed only by the original obligor(s) (without additions or substitutions),

  1. The only amount which may be renewed tax free is
    unpaid principal balance of the note, without increase, and
  2. Proper documentary stamp tax paid on the original note
    or recordation of the mortgage.

According to Rule 12B-4.054(1)(a), F.A.C., when a single note is given which consolidates two or more notes, so as to continue the existing contractual obligations, without enlargement of the existing principal balances, the consolidated note is exempt as a renewal note.

Department's Position

We concur that the proper amount of documentary stamp taxes was paid on these three initial mortgages totaling $XX. Also legends attached to each mortgage adequately address the proper documentary stamp tax liability.

Likewise, the renewal note and the modification agreement are exempt from additional documentary stamp taxes under s. 201.08, F.S.

This binding technical advisement only pertains to documentary stamp tax issues.

This response constitutes a Technical Assistance Advisement under s. 213.22, F.S., which is binding on the Department only under the facts and circumstances described in the request for this advice as specified in s. 213.22, F.S. Our response is predicated on those facts and the specific situation summarized above. You are advised that subsequent statutory or administrative rule changes or judicial interpretations of the statutes or rules upon which this advice is based may subject similar future transactions to a different treatment than expressed in this response.

You are further advised that this response and your request

are public records under Chapter 119, F.S., which are subject to disclosure to the public under the conditions of s. 213.22, F.S. Your name, address, and any other details which might lead to identification of the taxpayer must be deleted by the Department before disclosure. In an effort to protect the confidentiality of such information, we request you notify the undersigned in writing within 15 days of any deletions you wish made to the request or the response.

Sincerely,

Baldan E. Sulker
Senior Tax Specialist
Tax Policy and Dispute Resolution
Office of General Counsel

BES/mh

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1996. Ezel checks current Florida tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace