Were five open-end loan forms used by a Florida lender subject to documentary stamp tax?

Short answer No. As presented, none of the five forms contained all three required elements of a taxable written obligation: a written promise to pay, a sum certain in money, and the borrower's signature.
State
FL
Ruling
TAA 96B4-002
Tax type
Documentary Stamp Tax
Issued
1996-01-23
Issued by
Florida Department of Revenue
Requested by
A redacted lender using five open-end loan forms for member loans

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1996. Ask about yours and see what current Florida tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1996
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is an official Florida Technical Assistance Advisement limited to the five open-end loan forms the redacted lender submitted. Under section 213.22, it binds the Department only for those forms and facts. Different wording, signatures, incorporated documents, transaction documents, or later law could change the result.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

None of the five submitted open-end loan forms was subject to Florida documentary stamp tax as presented. The Department said a taxable written obligation under section 201.08 had to contain, within the document or referenced documents, three elements: a written promise to pay, a sum certain in money, and the borrower's signature.

The reviewed forms were a LoanLiner advance-request voucher and security agreement, a LoanLiner credit agreement and insurance certificate, a pre-approved auto-loan draft, an express security agreement, and a cash-disbursement draft. None contained all three elements, so the Department found them untaxed on the submitted facts.

What this means for you

The result turned on the actual language and signatures in these specific forms. A similar-looking loan document can be taxable if its own terms, or documents it brings into the analysis, supply all three required elements.

Common questions

Q: Were any of the five reviewed forms taxable? A: No, not as presented to the Department.

Q: What elements did the Department require? A: A written promise to pay, a sum certain in money, and the borrower's signature.

Q: Does this clear every open-end loan document? A: No. The ruling was limited to the five submitted forms and their contents.

Citations and references

  • Fla. Stat. § 201.08(1) — documentary stamp tax on written obligations to pay money
  • Fla. Stat. § 213.22 — Technical Assistance Advisements

Source

Original ruling text

Jan 23, 1996

Re: Technical Assistance Advisement No. 96(B)4-002 Documentary Stamp Tax; Taxation of Various Open End Loan Forms XXX (Lender)

Dear :

You have petitioned for a Technical Assistance Advisement pursuant to s. 213.22, F.S., and Florida Administrative Code Rule 12-11.003.

Issue

Whether certain open-end loan forms used by Lender in making loans to its members are subject to documentary stamp tax under s. 201.08(1), F.S.

You have enclosed the following forms for our determination:

  1. LoanLiner Advance Request Voucher and Security
    Agreement (Form No. VFL065 6826LL);
  2. Loanliner Credit Agreement and Insurance Certificate
    (Form No. BFL215 6826LL);
  3. Pre-Approved Auto Loan Draft with instructions (No
    Form Number);
  4. Express Security Agreement (No Form Number);
  5. Cash Disbursement Draft (No Form Number).

Requested Advisement

Whether or not the listed forms are subject to Florida documentary stamp tax under s. 201.08(1), F.S.

Discussion and Law

Relevant to your petition, s. 201.08(1), F.S., provides

that for a written obligation to pay money that is made, executed, delivered, sold, transferred, or assigned in the State and for each renewal of the same, the tax shall be 35 cents on
$100 or fraction thereof of the indebtedness or obligation evidence thereby.

In order to be taxable under s. 201.08, F.S., a written obligation to pay money must have the following three elements within the four corners of the document or must reference other documents containing these elements:

l. A written promise to pay;

  1. A sum certain in money; and
  2. The signature of the borrower.

Department's Position

None of the forms submitted for our review contain all three elements required under s. 201.08, F.S. Therefore, these forms as presented are not subject to tax.

This response constitutes a Technical Assistance Advisement under s. 213.22, F.S., which is binding on the Department only under the facts and circumstances described in the request for this advice as specified in s. 213.22, F.S. Our response is predicated on those facts and the specific situation summarized above. You are advised that subsequent statutory or administrative rule changes or judicial interpretations of the statutes or rules upon which this advice is based may subject similar future transactions to a different treatment than expressed in this response.

You are further advised that this response and your request are public records under Chapter 119, F.S., which are subject to disclosure to the public under the conditions of s. 213.22, F.S. Your name, address, and any other details which might lead to identification of the taxpayer must be deleted by the Department before disclosure. In an effort to protect the confidentiality of such information, we request you notify the undersigned in writing within 15 days of any deletions you wish made to the request or the response.

Sincerely,

Baldan E. Sulker
Senior Tax Specialist
Tax Policy and Dispute
Resolution
Office of General Counsel

BES/mh

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1996. Ezel checks current Florida tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace