FL TAA 96A-042 Sales and Use Tax 1996-08-12

Which shopping-mall tenant charges were taxable as rent, and when could a separately billed electricity reimbursement be excluded?

Short answer: Nearly every listed charge was taxable rent: fixed and percentage rent, common-area maintenance, real-estate tax, sprinkler, insurance, marketing, refuse, landlord-work, water, gas, and telephone charges. Electricity was excluded only when separately billed, the lessor had paid its tax, and tenants were charged no more than the allocated utility cost. Any excess was taxable additional rent.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1996. Ezel answers yours, under current Florida tax law, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1996
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is an official Technical Assistance Advisement of the Florida Department of Revenue, issued to a requester under section 213.22, Florida Statutes, on the facts and circumstances described in the request. The advisement's standard closing states that it binds the Department only under those facts and circumstances and that later statutory or administrative-rule changes or judicial interpretations may produce a different result. Identifying details may be redacted. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice. Consult a licensed Florida tax professional about your specific facts.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Florida treated almost every listed shopping-mall tenant charge as taxable rent, with a narrow exclusion for qualifying electricity reimbursements.

The standard lease required fixed minimum rent, percentage rent, and numerous additional charges. The Department found taxable the common-area maintenance charge, real-estate tax charge, sprinkler charge, insurance charge, initial and recurring marketing charges, refuse charge, landlord-work charges, and reimbursements for water, gas, and telephone service.

Those payments were required for the right to use and occupy the premises and were designated as additional rent. The water, gas, and telephone amounts were approximate operating-cost reimbursements rather than true resales of separately identified services.

Electricity was different. An allocated electricity cost was not taxable rent if it was separately billed, the lessor had paid the tax on the tenant's electricity, the allocation used a reasonable method such as a submeter or square footage, and the tenant paid no more than the lessor's cost. Any amount above cost became taxable additional rent.

What this means for you

  • Calling a charge maintenance, insurance, marketing, utilities, or reimbursement did not remove it from taxable rent.
  • The lease's treatment of the charges as additional rent supported taxation.
  • Electricity required separate billing, prior tax payment, reasonable allocation, and an at-cost-or-lower tenant charge.

Common questions

Q: Were common-area maintenance and property-tax charges taxable?
A: Yes. They were part of the payment for use and occupancy of the mall space.

Q: Were water, gas, and telephone reimbursements taxable?
A: Yes. The Department treated them as overhead recovered through rent.

Q: When was electricity excluded?
A: Only when separately billed under the ruling's tax-paid, reasonably allocated, and no-markup conditions. Any markup was taxable rent.

Citations and references

  • Fla. Stat. § 212.031(1)(a), (c) — tax on the total rent charged for use or occupancy of real property
  • Fla. Admin. Code r. 12A-1.070 — real property rentals and licenses
  • Omni International of Miami v. Department of Banking and Finance, 444 So. 2d 540 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984) — electricity allocation cited by the Department
  • Fla. Stat. § 213.22 — Technical Assistance Advisements

Source

Original ruling text

Aug 12, 1996

Re: TAA 96A-042
Taxable Elements of a Shopping Mall Lease
Section 212.031(1)(a), and (1)(c), F.S.
Rule 12A-1.070, F.A.C.

Dear :

This is a response, styled a Technical Assistance Advisement, to
your letter dated April 15, 1996, wherein you asked whether certain
enumerated charges which are paid by the tenants of a shopping mall
in accordance with real property leases of space within such mall
which is owned and operated by XXXX (herein Lessor), are subject to
sales or use tax. You provided the Department with a copy of what
you described as a "standard lease" (herein Lease), executed by
Lessor and various tenants of the shopping mall.

The Lease provides in Article 6 that each tenant is obligated to pay
to Lessor what is described as a "Fixed Minimum Rent." In addition,
each tenant is obligated under Article 7. to pay a "Percentage Rent"
computed on the gross sales of each tenant. The Lease also provides
that the tenant pay other charges in addition to the Fixed Minimum
Rent, and the Percentage Rent. These other charges are described in
various articles of the Lease. You ask whether any of these
charges, including the Fixed Minimum Rent and the Percentage Rent,
escape the imposition of sales or use tax.

The several enumerated charges, described in various articles of the
Lease, and about which you ask, are presented as follows. The order
you gave in your letter to these charges has been altered. Further,
the style of some of the charges has also been changed to conform to
the designation, or general description as in the instance of the
tenant's share of insurance premiums.

These charges are:

Fixed Minimum Rent

Percentage Rent
Tenant's Common Area Maintenance Charge
Tax Charge (Real Estate Charge)
Sprinkler Charge
Insurance premium charge (Insurance Charge)
Initial Marketing Charge
Marketing Charge
Refuse Charge
Exhibit 2 Charges
Utilities
water
gas
telephone
electricity

As to these charges you opine that the only charge which may be
exempt from sales or use tax is that of electricity.

Department Response

Section 212.031(1)(a), F.S., imposes the tax on the privilege of
leasing or licensing the use of real property. Section
212.031(1)(c), F.S., specifies that the tax shall be computed "...
on the total rent or license fee charged for real property by the
person charging or collecting the rental or license fee." This
statutory provision also provides that the tax is levied on the
payments given in exchange for the grant "... of a privilege to use
or occupy real property for any purpose and shall include base rent,
percentage rents, or similar charges." Rule 12A-1.070, F.A.C.,
interprets these statutory provisions.

Thus, Florida law imposes sales or use tax, by operation of s.
212.031, F.S., on the total rent or license payment when such
payment is given for the right to use or occupy real property for
any purpose. Applying these statutory provisions to the enumerated
charges depicted above, the payments made by the tenant styled Fixed
Minimum Rent, and Percentage Rent are determined to be subject to
sales or use tax.

The enumerated charge styled Tenant's Common Area Maintenance
Charge, is described in Article 34(a), as imposing the duty on each

tenant to pay "... a share of the Operating Costs of the common
areas of the Shopping Center." The term Operating Costs is defined
to include a variety of operating costs which is broadly meant to
embrace "... the total costs and expenses incurred in operating,
maintaining, and repairing the common areas and facilities...." The
tenant's share of these costs is determined, in Article 34(b), by an
arithmetic relationship between the square footage leased by each
tenant and the Operating Costs.

Article 33 grants to each tenant "... a license... to use the common
areas..." which are those areas further defined in the article as
spaces over which the Lessor has exclusive control and management.
Article 43 provides rights to the Lessor upon default, for failure
of the tenant to "... pay, when due, any rental, charge or other sum
payable hereunder...." In the event of default provisions of
Article 43(b) grant to the Lessor the right to either terminate the
lease and terminate the tenant's right to occupy the premises, or to
continue the lease in the event of the abandonment of the premises
by the tenant.

Further, Article 12(a) provides that "[i]n addition to the Fixed
Minimum Rent and Percentage Rent, all other payments to be made by
Tenant hereunder shall be deemed for the purposes of securing
collection to be Additional Rent...."

Consequently, by the operation of the cited statutory and Lease
provisions, the amount paid by tenant designated as Tenant's Common
Area Maintenance Charge is an element of the taxable lease payment
made by the tenant and is subject to the tax under s. 212.031,
Florida Statutes.

Similarly, the Tax Charge (you style the payment as a Real Estate
Charge), as assessed under Article 32; the Sprinkler Charge as
described in Article 31(d); the insurance premium charge (you style
this payment as an Insurance Charge), as described in Article 39(b);
the Initial Marketing Assessment Charge, a one-time fee paid by the
tenant as described in Article 1(v); the Marketing Charge, which is
a predetermined amount as stated in Article 1(u); the Refuse Charge
as specified in Exhibit C, paragraph (b), which is based on a "...
reasonable estimate of the amount of refuse and garbage generated
and the frequency or use by [the tenant]"; and all the charges you

style as Exhibit 2 Charges, which are to be paid by the tenant as
required in Exhibit B, Article III under the legend Description of
Landlord's Work, are subject to sales tax as elements of the lease
payment required for the use and occupancy of the real property.
Again, it is noted that all these charges under the provisions of
Article 12(a) are designated as Additional Rent.

The remaining charges to be paid by the tenant under the Lease are
grouped under the legend Utilities, and include the billing of the
tenant by the Lessor as to water, gas, telephone and electricity
services. With the exception of the charge for electricity as
discussed in a following paragraph, all the charges for water, gas,
and telephone are taxable elements of the payment required under the
Lease and are subject to the tax as imposed by s. 212.031, Florida
Statutes. The tax applies to these charges because the charges are
not made in the nature of a sale of such services to the tenant, but
as a mere recitation of overhead items which must be recovered by
the Lessor through reimbursement by the tenant.

Thus, in none of these charges are the specific components of the
billing to the Lessor by the utility vendors replicated in the
Lessor's billing to the tenants. Rather, the reimbursement to the
Lessor is an approximate amount of cost recovery by the Lessor of
the actual cost of the utilities which was borne by the Lessor. In
such a method of billing, the identity of the individual items is
lost and the billing becomes a method of simple reimbursement of
certain operating costs to the Lessor.

By operation of the cited statutory provisions, and the Lease
stipulation that these charges shall be paid by the tenant as
additional rent, the conclusion is reached that these payments, as
all of the other previously discussed charges, are made by the
tenant in exchange for the right to use and occupy the leased
premises. Consequently, these charges are part of the total lease
payment subject to sales or use tax.

However, the charge for electricity is not part of the total lease
payment subject to sales or use tax. You described the premises as
serviced by a common meter. Presumably, the Lessor negotiates with
the utility provider for the electric service. The Lessor pays the
utility provider for the cost of the electricity, and then by some

allocative method apportions the electricity cost to the tenants. In
such a circumstance the apportioned cost borne by the tenants is not
an element of the total lease payment subject to sales or use tax.

Electricity billed the tenant is not taxable as an element of the
lease payment irrespective whether such cost is designated as a
portion of the rent, or, for example, as part of an otherwise
taxable common area maintenance charge, provided the cost of the
electricity is separately billed to the tenant, that the sales tax
on the electricity consumed by the tenant, as determined either by a
submeter, square footage or lumens apportionment, or other estimate,
has been paid by the Lessor, and further provided that the cost of
the electricity billed the tenant is at the same or lower price as
that billed the Lessor by the utility provider. See, Omni
International of Miami v. Department of Banking and Finance, 444
So.2d 540 (Fla. 3DCA 1984).

Should the Lessor bill the tenant more than the cost of the
electricity to the Lessor, the excess shall be considered as
additional rent and subject to tax as imposed by s. 212.031, Florida
Statutes.

This response constitutes a Technical Assistance Advisement under s.
213.22, F.S., which is binding on the department only under the
facts and circumstances described in the request for this advice as
specified in s. 213.22, F.S. Our response is predicated on those
facts and the specific situation summarized above. You are advised
that subsequent statutory or administrative rule changes or judicial
interpretations of the statutes or rules upon which this advice is
based may subject similar future transactions to a different
treatment than expressed in this response.

You are further advised that this response and your request are
public records under Chapter 119, F.S., which are subject to
disclosure to the public under the conditions of s. 213.22, F.S.
Your name, address, and any other details which might lead to
identification of the taxpayer must be deleted by the Department
before disclosure. In an effort to protect the confidentiality of
such information, we request you notify the undersigned in writing
within 15 days of any deletions you wish made to the request or the
response.

Sincerely,

Robert G. Parsons
Tax Law Specialist
Tax Policy and Dispute Resolution

Ctrl. No. 25382

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 1996 ruling on this question. Ezel checks current Florida tax law and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.