Were a retailer's separately stated home-delivery charges taxable when customers could avoid them by picking up purchases?
Apply this to your situation
This page answers the general question as of 1996. Ask about yours and see what current Florida tax law says, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Florida found the retailer's separately stated optional delivery charges were not subject to sales tax.
Customers could either pay for home delivery or pick up merchandise without a delivery charge. The seller bore risk of loss until delivery, customers could refuse delivery, and the paperwork did not clearly say where title passed.
Rule 12A-1.045 excluded transportation charges when they were separately stated and avoidable solely by the purchaser. It also presumed an F.O.B.-origin sale when documentation did not establish where title passed. Because both exemption conditions were met, the Department found no tax on the delivery charges.
What this means for you
- Delivery had to be optional at the customer's sole choice.
- The charge had to be separately stated.
- Unclear title-passage documents did not defeat the ruling's result under the cited presumption.
Common questions
Q: Were the optional delivery charges taxable? A: No.
Q: What if the customer picked up the merchandise? A: No delivery charge was imposed.
Q: Did unclear F.O.B. terms make the charge taxable? A: No. The cited rule presumed F.O.B. origin when the documents were inadequate.
Citations and references
- Fla. Stat. § 212.02(16) — sales price
- Fla. Stat. § 212.05(1)(a)1.a. — retail sales tax
- Fla. Admin. Code r. 12A-1.045 — transportation charges
- Florida Hi-Lift v. Department of Revenue, 571 So. 2d 1364 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991)
- Department of Revenue v. B & L Concepts, Inc., 612 So. 2d 720 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993)
- Fla. Stat. § 213.22 — Technical Assistance Advisements
Source
- Landing page: Florida Tax Law Library
- Advisement: TAA 96A-033
Original ruling text
Apr 30, 1996
Re: Technical Assistance Advisement 96A-033 Sales and Use Tax - Transportation Charges Sections: 212.02, 212.05, F.S.
Rule: 12A-1.045, F.A.C.
Petitioner: XXXX (herein "Taxpayer")
FEl: XXXX
Dear:
This is a response to your petition received February 8, 1996, for the Department's issuance of a Technical Assistance Advisement ("TAA") concerning the above referenced party and matter. Your petition has been carefully examined and the Department finds it to be in compliance with the requisite criteria set forth in Chapter 12-11, F.A.C. This response to your request constitutes a TAA and is issued to you under the
authority of s. 213.22, F.S.
DISCUSSION OF FACTS
Taxpayer's customers purchasing merchandise in Taxpayer's stores are given the option of either having merchandise they purchase delivered to their homes for an extra charge or picking merchandise up at Taxpayer's place of business. The delivery charge is automatic once the customer elects
to have the item delivered. In the alternative, when customers pick up merchandise at Taxpayer's place of
business, no delivery charge is imposed.
Taxpayer's sales slips and other documentation related to the sale of the merchandise do not clearly indicate whether title to merchandise delivered to customers passes to the customer at the point at which shipment originates (F.O.B. origin), or at the destination to which the shipment is delivered (F.O.B. destination). However, Taxpayer bears
the risk of loss on merchandise up until delivery, and the
customer has the right to refuse delivery at the point of
destination.
REQUESTED ADVISEMENT
Are transportation charges subject to tax where: 1) the charge is separately stated on the invoice; and 2) the charge can be avoided by a decision or action solely on the part of the purchaser, even where documentation accompanying shipment does not clearly indicate whether shipments are F.O.B. origin, and where circumstances surrounding the sale suggests that title
does not pass to the customer until delivery.
Discussion of Law
The following statutory and administrative cites, and case law are relevant to addressing the issue under advisement
herein:
Section 212.05, F.S, provides in part:
It is hereby declared to be the legislative intent that
every person is exercising a taxable privilege who engages in the business of selling tangible personal property at
retail in this state, including the business of making mail order sales, or who rents or furnishes any of the things or services taxable under this chapter, or who stores for use
or consumption in this state any item or article of
tangible personal property as defined herein and who leases
or rents such property within the state.
(1) For the exercise of such privilege, a tax is levied on each taxable transaction or incident, which tax is due and payable as follows:
(a)1.a. At the rate of 6 percent of the sales price of each item or article of tangible personal property when sold at retail in this state...
Section 212.02(16), F.S., defines "Sales price" as:
(16) "Sales price" means the total amount paid for tangible
personal property, including any services that are a part
of the sale...
Rule 12A-1.045, F.A.C., provides in part:
(1) "Transportation charges" includes carrying, delivery, freight, handling, pickup, shipping, and other similar
charges or fees.
(2) Transportation charges which are not separately stated on an invoice or bill of sale but are included in the sales price of taxable tangible personal property are subject to
tax.
(3)(a) Where the seller agrees to deliver tangible personal property to some designated place and the purchaser can not elect to avoid the charge for transportation services, the charge for the transportation service is subject to tax,
even if separately stated on an invoice or bill of sale.
(4)(a) The charge for transportation services is not subject to tax when both of the following conditions have
been met:
- The charge is separately stated on an invoice or bill of
sale; and
- The charge can be avoided by a decision or action solely
on the part of the purchaser...
(5) If the seller contracts to sell tangible personal
property F.O.B. origin, the title to the property passes at the point of origin. Since the title to the property
passes at the point of origin, transportation services arranged by the seller and rendered to the buyer are nota part of the taxable selling price, provided the transportation charges are separately stated. Where the transportation charges are billed by the seller to the
buyer but documentation is inadequate to establish the
point at which title passed to the buyer, it is presumed
that the tangible personal property was sold F.O.B. origin and the title to the property passes at the point of
origin. In such instances, the transportation charges are not considered a part of the selling price of the property,
if separately stated...
In Florida Hi-Lift v. Department of Revenue, 571 So.2d 1364 (Fla. 1DCA 1991), the court found that the rental of equipment
was a "sale"; that Rule 12A-1.045, F.A.C., was applicable; and that the transportation charges, while incidental to the sale, were not part of the total sales prices because the equipment was F.O.B. lessor's site, and the lessee had the option of
picking up the equipment or having delivery made by the lessor.
In Department of Revenue v. B & L Concepts, Inc., 612 So.2d 720 (Fla. 5DCA 1993), in which the court relied on Florida Hi-
Lift, supra, the delivery charges for rented home furnishings were incidental to the sale but not part of the taxable sales prices when the charges "... are separately itemized, and applied at the sole option or election of the vendee or lessee, or can be avoided by decision or action on the part of the
vendee alone...."
Discussion, Analysis, and Conclusion of Law Rule 12A-1.045, F.A.C., which deals with sales tax on
transportation charges, has been substantially rewritten to
recognize the decisions in Florida Hi-Lift v. Department of
Revenue, supra, and in Department of Revenue v. B & L Concepts,
Inc., supra. Rule 12A-1.045, F.A.C., provides that
transportation charges are not a part of the sales price and as such not subject to tax when both of the following conditions
are met: 1) the transportation charges are separately stated on an invoice or bill of sale; and 2) the transportation charges
can be avoided by a decision or action solely on the part of the purchaser. Furthermore, Rule 12A-1.045(5), F.A.C., provides: "Where the transportation charges are billed by the seller to
the buyer but documentation is inadequate to establish the point at which title passed to the buyer, it is presumed that the tangible personal property was sold F.O.B. origin and the title
to the property passes at the point of origin. In such
instances, the transportation charges are not considered a part
of the selling price of the property, if separately stated."
Therefore, based on the facts presented, Taxpayer's transportation charges would not be subject to tax, because Taxpayer is separately stating the transportation charges and such charges can be avoided by the purchaser. As long as the transportation charges are separately stated and can be avoided by the purchaser, there are no provisions in Rule 12A-1.045, F.A.C., which require tax to be imposed on transportation
charges.
This response constitutes a Technical Assistance Advisement under s. 213.22, F.S., which is binding on the department only under the facts and circumstances described in the request for this advice, as specified in s. 213.22, F.S. Our response is predicated upon those facts and the specific situation summarized above. You are advised that subsequent statutory or administrative rule changes or judicial interpretations of the statutes or rules upon which this advice is based may subject similar future transactions to a different treatment from that
which is expressed in this response.
You are further advised that this response and your request are public records under Chapter 119, F.S., which are subject to disclosure to the public under the conditions of s. 213.22, F.S. Your name, address, and any other details that might lead to identification of the taxpayer must be deleted by the Department before disclosure. In an effort to protect the confidentiality of such information, we request you notify the undersigned in writing within 15 days of any deletions you wish made to the
request or this response.
Sincerely,
Leigh L. Ceci
Senior Tax Specialist
Enclosure
Control #24657
What does the law say today, for your facts?
This ruling is from 1996. Ezel checks current Florida tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace