Should a fire-alarm contractor charge Florida sales tax on an itemized life-safety system upgrade and its installation?
Apply this to your situation
This page answers the general question as of 1996. Ezel answers yours, under current Florida tax law, with citations.
Plain-English summary
The contractor had to collect Florida sales tax on the separately itemized fire-alarm materials, but not on the separately stated installation charge.
The life-safety system would become an improvement to real property after installation. Florida's contractor rule generally makes a contractor the taxable consumer of materials used under lump-sum, cost-plus, fixed-fee, or guaranteed-price contracts. For an itemized contract, however, the contractor is treated as selling the specifically described materials at retail and collects tax from the property owner on those material charges.
The Department concluded that the parties intended an itemized contract. The contractor's invoices listed individual materials and prices, the agreement added sales tax to the stated contract price, and the taxpayer said title passed after inspection but before installation. Because installation was separately stated, it was not taxed.
What this means for you
For Florida real-property work, the contract's billing structure and the parties' title terms can determine who pays tax and on what amount. Detailed material invoices, a separate installation charge, and title passing before installation supported retail-sale treatment here. A lump-sum or other non-itemized arrangement would place the contractor in the role of ultimate consumer under the rule quoted in the ruling.
Common questions
Q: Was the entire life-safety-system contract taxable?
A: No. Tax applied to the separately itemized materials, while the separately stated installation charge was not taxable.
Q: Why did the Department treat the contractor as selling materials at retail?
A: The invoices itemized the materials and prices, the contract price was stated as an amount plus sales tax, and title passed to the taxpayer before installation.
Q: Would a lump-sum contract receive the same treatment?
A: Not under the rule quoted in the advisement. For lump-sum and other non-itemized real-property contracts, the contractor is treated as the ultimate consumer of materials.
Citations and references
- Fla. Admin. Code r. 12A-1.051 — contractor purchases and itemized contracts for real-property improvements
- Fla. Stat. § 213.22 — Technical Assistance Advisements
Source
- Landing page: Florida Tax Law Library
- Advisement: TAA 96A-002
Original ruling text
Jan 12, 1996
Re: Technical Assistance Advisement 96A-002
Sales and Use Tax - Fire Alarm System Upgrade
Rule: 12A-1.051, F.A.C.
Petitioner: XXX ("Taxpayer")
FEI: XXX
Dear :
This is a response to your petition received November 9,
1995, for the Department's issuance of a Technical Assistance
Advisement ("TAA") concerning the above referenced party and
matter. Your petition has been carefully examined and the
Department finds it to be in compliance with the requisite
criteria set forth in Chapter 12-11, F.A.C. This response to
your request constitutes a TAA and is issued to you under the
authority of s. 213.22, F.S.
DISCUSSION OF FACTS
Your letter imparts the following discussion concerning the
matter under advisement:
XXX (hereafter Contractor) has contracted to provide
Taxpayer with a life safety system consisting of the
following subsystems: (1) Fire alarm subsystem; (2)
Emergency paging and voice alarms subsystem; (3) Emergency
telephone subsystem; and (4) Existing manual smoke control
subsystem. The life safety system is built and wired into
the wall and would appear to be an improvement to real
property once installed. Contractor has submitted the
following price breakdown of the life safety system:
"XXX Equipment
"Outside Vendor Equipment
"Certification, Programming,
$225,772.00
$ 37,912.00
Inspection & Testing
$ 54,812.00
"Labor
$227,846.00
"Freight
$ 2,800.00
"Sub-total
$509,142.00
"Florida Sales Tax
$ 30,573.52
"Total Installation Price:
$539,715.52"
Contractor also provided Taxpayer with thirteen (13) pages
of contract detail. Pages 11-12 provided a "Bill of Material"
in conjunction with the materials listed above in the price
breakdown. There are no itemized prices for the materials. The
only categories provided are: (1) Quantity, (2) Model, and (3)
Description.
On November 15, 1995, you faxed copies of actual invoices
issued to Taxpayer from Contractor. The Contractor has itemized
in detail all materials on these invoices. For example, on page
one of invoice number XXX, the following itemization of
materials occurred:
"CXE-1 Enclosure Pkg
1
388.850
$388.85
"EDX-1 XL3 Door Pkg
1
304.320
$304.32
2
228.580
$457.16
...
"MDR-2 Enclosure Door
"MBR-2 Encl Pkg
2
262.390
$524.78
. . ."
This same detailed itemization of the materials continued
through page four. Per our conversation, you stated that
pursuant to an oral agreement between Taxpayer and Contractor,
the F.O.B. terms were that title to all materials passed to
Taxpayer upon receipt of the materials. You stated that upon
receipt of the materials Taxpayer is granted an inspection of
the materials. After the inspection, if the quantity and quality
of the materials are satisfactory, title to the materials passes
to Taxpayer prior to the installation of the materials.
REQUESTED ADVISEMENT
Should contractor charge Taxpayer tax on the abovedescribed life safety system upgrade?
DISCUSSION, ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION OF LAW
Rule 12A-1.051, F.A.C., provides in part:
"(1) This rule shall govern the taxability of purchases or
use of tangible personal property by contractors who
purchase or manufacture materials and supplies for use in
the performance of non public works contracts....
"(2) Such contractors may... use one of the following
methods in arriving at the total contract price:
"(a) Contracts in which the contractor or subcontractor
agrees to furnish materials and supplies and necessary
services for a lump sum;
"(b) Contracts in which the contractor or subcontractor
agrees to furnish the materials and supplies and necessary
services on a cost plus or fixed fee basis;
"(c) Contracts in which the contractor or subcontractor
agrees to furnish materials and supplies and necessary
services with an upset or guaranteed price which may not be
exceeded; and
"(d) Contracts in which the contractor or subcontractor
repairs, alters, improves or constructs real property and
wherein he agrees to sell specifically described and
itemized materials and supplies at an agreed price or at
the regular retail price and to complete the work either
for an additional agreed price or on the basis of time
consumed.
"(e) When a contractor or subcontractor uses materials and
supplies in fulfilling either a lump sum, cost plus, fixed
fee, guaranteed price or any kind of contract except one
falling in class (d) above, he becomes the ultimate
consumer thereof. The person or dealer who sells such
materials and supplies to such contractor or subcontractor
is making sales at retail and is required to collect the
tax from him based upon the receipts from such sales.
"(f) In cases falling in class (d) above, the contractor or
subcontractor is deemed to be selling tangible personal
property at an agreed retail price and shall collect tax
from his purchaser based upon the amount of the receipts
from such sales, excluding installation charges if
separately stated. A dealer selling to such contractor or
subcontractor must obtain a resale certificate in lieu of
tax....
"(16) Materials purchased for use in the performance of
lump sum, cost plus, fixed fee or guaranteed price
contracts for the improvement of real property are taxable
to all contractors, including but not limited to the
following contractors...
Burglar and fire alarm system..."
Pursuant to Rule 12A-1.051, F.A.C., a contractor may elect
to perform either a lump sum, cost plus, fixed fee, guaranteed
price or itemized contract. In fulfilling all contracts except
itemized contracts, the contractor becomes the ultimate consumer
of all materials and supplies used. In fulfilling itemized
contracts, the contractor is deemed to be selling tangible
personal property and must collect tax from his purchaser based
on the itemized charges for materials, excluding installation
charges if separately stated.
Based on the information presented, it appears that the
intent of both parties was to enter into a itemized contract.
The invoices are clearly described and itemized, and title to
the materials passes prior to installation. Furthermore, the
price breakdown provides a line item for tax, and although the
actual contract is not itemized, the contract does state, "Total
price for the above shall be $509,142.00 plus sales tax."
Therefore, pursuant to Rule 12A-1.051, F.A.C., the contractor is
agreeing to sell specifically described and itemized materials
and must collect tax from Taxpayer based upon the amount of the
materials. Because this is a real property contract and
installation was separately stated, tax is not due on the
installation charge.
This response constitutes a Technical Assistance Advisement
under s. 213.22, F.S., which is binding on the department only
under the facts and circumstances described in the request for
this advice, as specified in s. 213.22, F.S. Our response is
predicated upon those facts and the specific situation
summarized above. You are advised that subsequent statutory or
administrative rule changes or judicial interpretations of the
statutes or rules upon which this advice is based may subject
similar future transactions to a different treatment from that
which is expressed in this response.
You are further advised that this response and your request
are public records under Chapter 119, F.S., which are subject to
disclosure to the public under the conditions of s. 213.22, F.S.
Your name, address, and any other details that might lead to
identification of the taxpayer must be deleted by the Department
before disclosure. In an effort to protect the confidentiality
of such information, we request you notify the undersigned in
writing within 15 days of any deletions you wish made to the
request or this response.
Sincerely,
Leigh L. Ceci
Senior Tax Specialist
/LLC
Control #23895
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read a 1996 ruling on this question. Ezel checks current Florida tax law and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.