FL TAA 95C2-023 Intangible Personal Property Tax 1995-07-25

Would Florida residents owe intangible tax after contributing their securities portfolio to an out-of-state limited partnership not registered with the SEC?

Short answer: No, on the stated facts. Once the portfolio was transferred and no longer owned, managed, or controlled by the Florida residents, it was not subject to Florida intangible tax. Their interests in the out-of-state partnership were also exempt, and the partnership's assets were not attributed back to them.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1995. Ezel answers yours, under current Florida tax law, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1995
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is an official Florida Technical Assistance Advisement applying Chapter 199 as it stood in 1995 to redacted Florida residents who proposed transferring securities to an out-of-state limited partnership with an out-of-state office and annual meetings. Under section 213.22, it binds the Department only for those facts. Different ownership, management, control, partnership registration, operations, asset transfers, or later law could change the result.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The Department answered the requested rulings in the affirmative: the transferred portfolio, the taxpayers' partnership interests, and the partnership's assets were not subject to Florida intangible tax in the ways proposed.

The Florida residents planned to contribute stock and bonds to an out-of-state limited partnership that would maintain its office and annual meetings outside Florida and would not be registered with the SEC. Once the residents no longer owned, managed, or controlled the contributed portfolio, the ruling said that portfolio would not be subject to Florida intangible tax.

The residents' interests in the foreign partnership were exempt because the partnership was not registered with the SEC. The partnership's assets also would not be attributed back to the residents for Florida intangible-tax purposes.

What this means for you

The result depended on a completed transfer of ownership, management, and control to the foreign partnership, as well as the partnership's SEC-registration status and out-of-state operations.

Common questions

Q: Did the securities remain taxable to the Florida residents after contribution?
A: No, once the portfolio was transferred and was no longer owned, managed, or controlled by them.

Q: Were their limited-partnership interests taxable?
A: No. The foreign partnership was not registered with the SEC.

Q: Were the partnership's assets attributed back to the Florida residents?
A: No, under the facts presented.

Citations and references

  • Fla. Stat. ch. 199 — intangible personal property tax
  • Fla. Stat. § 213.22 — Technical Assistance Advisements

Source

Original ruling text

Jul 25, 1995

Re: Technical Assistance Advisement No. 95(C)2-023
Intangible Personal Property Tax;
Interest in a Foreign Limited Partnership
XXX (Taxpayers)

Dear :

This is in response to your recent request for a technical
assistance advisement.

Facts

The Taxpayers are residents of Florida who currently own
stock and bonds issued by various publicly-traded corporations
as well as tax-exempt bonds issued by various state and
municipal governments. It is proposed that an out-of-state
limited partnership be formed by the Taxpayers. The partnership
will not be registered with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (SEC), nor will it be subject to any regulation by
the SEC. Taxpayers will contribute part or all of their
portfolio to the limited partnership in exchange for partnership
interests. The partnership will maintain office space and
telephone service in an out-of-state location. Partnership
meetings will be held annually outside Florida and attended by
the partners.

Requested Advisement

It is requested that the Department of Revenue stipulate
that the Taxpayers' portfolio will not be subject to Florida
intangible tax once it is transferred to the limited
partnership. Further, the Department is asked to stipulate that
the taxpayers' interest in the limited partnership is not
subject to Florida intangible tax and that the assets owned by
the out-of-state limited partnership will not be attributed to
the Taxpayers for Florida intangible tax purposes.

Discussion and Law

Chapter 199, F.S., provides that every person who on
January 1 owns, controls, or manages intangible personal
property which has a taxable situs in this state must file an
intangible tax return. Intangible personal property has a
taxable situs in Florida when it is owned, managed, or
controlled by any person domiciled in this state on January 1 of
the tax year.

Interest in a partnership either general or limited, other
than the interest of a limited partner in a limited partnership
registered with the Securities Exchange Commission, is exempt
from the intangible tax.

Once Taxpayers' portfolio is transferred to the limited
partnership, in a state other than Florida, and is no longer
owned, managed, or controlled by the Taxpayers it would not be
subject to the Florida intangible tax. Further, since the
foreign partnership is not registered with the SEC, Taxpayers'
interest in the partnership would not subject to the Florida
intangible tax. Assets owned by a foreign limited partnership
will not be attributed to the Taxpayers for Florida intangible
tax purposes.

Conclusion

Based upon statutory provisions and the information in your
letter, your requested advisement is answered in the
affirmative.

This response constitutes a Technical Assistance Advisement
under s. 213.22, F.S., which is binding on the Department only
under the facts and circumstances described in the request for
this advice as specified in s. 213.22, F.S. Our response is
predicated on those facts and the specific situation summarized
above. You are advised that subsequent statutory or
administrative rule changes or judicial interpretations of the
statutes or rules upon which this advice is based may subject
similar future transactions to a different treatment than
expressed in this response.

You are further advised that this response and your request
are public records under Chapter 119, F.S., which are subject to
disclosure to the public under the conditions of s. 213.22, F.S.
Your name, address, and any other details which might lead to
identification of the taxpayer must be deleted by the Department
before disclosure. In an effort to protect the confidentiality
of such information, we request you notify the undersigned in
writing within 15 days of any deletions you wish made to the
request or the response.

Sincerely,

Nadine C. Posey
Senior Tax Specialist
Technical Assistance

NCP/mh

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 1995 ruling on this question. Ezel checks current Florida tax law and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.