FL TAA 95C2-018 Intangible Personal Property Tax 1995-05-23

Was the cash-collateral asset recorded by a securities-lending intermediary subject to Florida intangible personal property tax?

Short answer: No. The intermediary's recorded asset was a collateral cash deposit securing return of borrowed securities, and the cited statutes treated money as exempt. The ruling addressed only the middleman's books, not the tax treatment of the surrounding parties or transactions.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1995. Ezel answers yours, under current Florida tax law, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1995
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is an official Florida Technical Assistance Advisement applying the 1995 intangible-tax provisions to a redacted securities-lending intermediary's simultaneous short-term exchanges, collateral cash deposit, repayment obligations, and financial-statement entries. The ruling expressly addressed only the middleman, not the surrounding transactions. Under section 213.22, it binds the Department only for those facts. Different ownership, collateral, contracts, obligations, accounting, parties, or later law could change the result.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The intermediary did not owe Florida intangible tax on the collateral-cash asset recorded on its books.

The company arranged short-term exchanges in which one party supplied cash and another lent securities. The intermediary simultaneously passed the cash to the securities lender as collateral and later arranged the reverse exchange.

Although the intermediary recorded an asset and liability for financial-reporting purposes, ownership of the securities stayed with the lender. The recorded asset was a cash deposit, and the cited statutes treated money as exempt from intangible tax.

The Department expressly limited its conclusion to the intermediary and did not decide the surrounding parties' transactions.

What this means for you

The ruling classified the specific recorded asset by its substance as cash collateral. It did not grant a blanket exemption for every securities-lending arrangement.

Common questions

Q: What asset appeared on the intermediary's books?
A: A collateral cash deposit securing the return of securities.

Q: Who owned the loaned securities?
A: Ownership remained with the securities lender.

Q: Was the cash deposit taxable?
A: No. It was exempt money under the cited provisions.

Q: Did the ruling decide the other parties' tax treatment?
A: No. It specifically addressed only the middleman.

Citations and references

  • Fla. Stat. § 199.023(2) — definition of money
  • Fla. Stat. § 199.185(1) — money exemption
  • Fla. Stat. § 213.22 — Technical Assistance Advisements

Source

Original ruling text

May 23, 1995

Re: Technical Assistance Advisement No. 95(C)2-018
Florida Intangible Personal Property Tax - Middleman
Arranging for the Borrowing of Stock/Securities in Exchange
for Cash
XXX (Company)

Dear :

This is in response to your recent request for a technical
assistance advisement.

Facts

Company is in the business of acting as middleman for
financial organizations, brokerage houses and corporations
whereby it will arrange for stock/securities to be borrowed in
exchange for cash collateral. The parties involved are:

(1) "A" - who is requesting shares of stock or securities
in exchange for cash.
(2) "B" - who is lending shares of stock or securities in
exchange for cash.
(3) Company - who is acting as middleman.

The Company arranges for a simultaneous exchange of
stock/securities and cash with "A" and "B". The exchange is for
a very short period (from one to a few days). At the end of
this time, Company arranges for the reverse exchange. There are
separate contractual arrangements between "A" and "B" and
Company in which Company is obligated to both parties for
repayment of the cash and stock/securities.

The stock or securities loaned and borrowed are not
reflected on Company's financial statements as their ownership
remains with "B". However, Company is required for financial
purposes to record an asset and liability because of the
obligations. The asset is a collateral cash deposit, for the

cash it deposits with "B" as collateral for the return of
securities; and the liability is for Company's obligation to
return cash to "A" when "A" returns the securities.

Statutory Reference

Section 199.023(2), F.S., provides that "Money" includes,
without limitation, United States legal tender, certificates of
deposit, cashier's and certified checks, bills of exchange,
drafts, the cash equivalent of annuities and life insurance
policies and similar instruments, which are held by a taxpayer,
or deposited with or held by a banking organization or any other
person. Money is listed in s. 199.185(1), F.S., as exempt from
the Florida intangible personal property tax.

Issue

Since the asset is a collateral cash deposit, for the
return of securities; and the liability is for the Company's
obligation to return cash to "A" when "A" returns the
securities, we believe that the asset on the Company's books at
the end of the calendar year is exempt from taxation as a cash
deposit.

Conclusion

Based on the above scenario, Company would not be subject
to Florida intangible personal property tax on the transactions
shown on his books. This response specifically addresses the
middleman and not the surrounding transactions.

This response constitutes a Technical Assistance Advisement
under s. 213.22, F.S., which is binding on the Department only
under the facts and circumstances described in the request for
this advice as specified in s. 213.22, F.S. Our response is
predicated on those facts and the specific situation summarized
above. You are advised that subsequent statutory or
administrative rule changes or judicial interpretations of the
statutes or rules upon which this advice is based may subject
similar future transactions to a different treatment than
expressed in this response.

You are further advised that this response and your request
are public records under Chapter 119, F.S., which are subject to
disclosure to the public under the conditions of s. 213.22, F.S.
Your name, address, and any other details which might lead to
identification of the taxpayer must be deleted by the Department
before disclosure. In an effort to protect the confidentiality
of such information, we request you notify the undersigned in
writing within 15 days of any deletions you wish made to the
request or the response.

Sincerely,

Nadine C. Posey
Senior Tax Specialist
Technical Assistance

NCP/mh

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 1995 ruling on this question. Ezel checks current Florida tax law and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.