Did a beneficiary with only a limited power of appointment, or the non-Florida trustee, owe Florida intangible personal property tax on the trust?

Short answer No. The beneficiary had only a limited power of appointment and could neither revoke the trust nor invade its corpus, so the beneficiary lacked a taxable beneficial interest. The trustee was not a Florida resident and had no Florida intangible-tax liability; neither party owed tax, and no trust return was required.
State
FL
Ruling
TAA 95C2-007
Tax type
Intangible Personal Property Tax
Issued
1995-02-08
Issued by
Florida Department of Revenue
Requested by
A redacted trust, beneficiary, and non-Florida trustee

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1995. Ask about yours and see what current Florida tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1995
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is an official Florida Technical Assistance Advisement applying the 1995 intangible-tax rules to a trust governed outside Florida, a beneficiary with limited appointment rights, and a nonresident trustee. Under section 213.22, it binds the Department only for those facts. Income rights, revocation or corpus powers, appointment authority, trustee residence or commercial domicile, situs, or later law could change the result.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Neither the beneficiary nor the non-Florida trustee owed Florida intangible personal property tax, and the trust did not have to file a return.

The beneficiary had only a limited power of appointment and could not revoke the trust or invade its corpus. That did not amount to a taxable beneficial interest under the cited statute and rule. The trust was governed by another state's law, and the trustee was not a Florida resident, so the trustee had no Florida taxable situs or liability.

What this means for you

The ruling turned on the beneficiary's actual trust powers and the trustee's residence or commercial domicile.

Common questions

Q: Did the beneficiary have a taxable beneficial interest? A: No.

Q: Why not?
A: The beneficiary had a limited—not unlimited—power of appointment and had no power to revoke the trust or invade its corpus.

Q: Did the trustee owe Florida intangible tax? A: No. The trustee was not a Florida resident.

Q: Was a Florida intangible-tax return required for the trust? A: No.

Citations and references

  • Fla. Stat. § 199.023(7) and Fla. Admin. Code r. 12C-2.002(1)(c) — taxable beneficial interest in a trust
  • Fla. Stat. § 199.052(5) — trustee responsibility
  • Fla. Stat. § 199.175 — Florida taxable situs
  • Fla. Stat. § 213.22 — Technical Assistance Advisements

Source

Original ruling text

Feb 08, 1995

Re: Technical Assistance Advisement No. 95(C)2-007 Intangible Personal Property Tax - Trust XXX (Trust) XXX (Beneficiary) XXX (Trustee)

Dear :

Your request for a technical assistance advisement has been received in this office.

Requested Advisement

(1) The Beneficiary will not be subject to Florida intangible personal property tax, with respect to his interest in the Trust because the Trust has foreign situs and the Beneficiary does not have a taxable beneficial interest in the Trust; and (2) neither the Trust nor the Trustee of the Trust will be required to file a return or pay an intangible tax.

Discussion of Trust Provisions

Under the provisions of the Trust the Beneficiary is granted a limited power of appointment over the assets of the Trust. This limitation says that the Beneficiary may not appoint to or for the benefit of the grantor, or the grantor's estate, or the creditors of the grantor's estate, any asset or income of the Trust. The Trust further provides that the Trust is established under and governed by the laws of a state other than Florida, and the Trustee is not a resident of Florida.

Provisions of Law

Section 199.023(7), F.S., and Rule 12C-2.002(1)(c), F.A.C., state that a taxable beneficial interest in a trust is the current right to income coupled with either a right t revoke the trust, or the right to invade the corpus of the trust, or an

unlimited power of appointment of future beneficiaries.

Section 199.052(5), F.S., places primary responsibility for payment of the intangible personal property tax on the Florida Trustee. To have a taxable situs in Florida the provisions of s. 199.175, F.S., must be met. The trustee must be a Florida resident or legally have a commercial domicile in Florida to have a taxable situs in Florida.

Discussion of Law

Based upon the provisions of the Trust, the Beneficiary has a limited power of appointment over the assets of the Trust, does not have a power to invade the corpus of the Trust, nor the power to revoke the Trust. Therefore, the Beneficiary of the Trust does not have a taxable beneficial interest in the Trust.

The Trustee is not a resident of Florida, and therefore, has no intangible tax liability in Florida.

Conclusion

In summary, neither the Beneficiary nor the Trustee is liable for the intangible personal property tax in Florida, and no return is required to be filed for the Trust.

This response constitutes a Technical Assistance Advisement under s. 213.22, F.S., which is binding on the Department only under the facts and circumstances described in the request for this advice as specified in s. 213.22, F.S. Our response is predicated on those facts and the specific situation summarized above. You are advised that subsequent statutory or administrative rule changes or judicial interpretations of the statutes or rules upon which this advice is based may subject similar future transactions to a different treatment than expressed in this response.

You are further advised that this response and your request are public records under Chapter 119, F.S., which are subject to disclosure to the public under the conditions of s. 213.22, F.S. Your name, address, and any other details which might lead to

identification of the taxpayer must be deleted by the Department before disclosure. In an effort to protect the confidentiality of such information, we request you notify the undersigned in writing within 15 days of any deletions you wish made to the request or the response.

Sincerely,

Nadine C. Posey
Tax Audit Specialist III
Technical Assistance

NCP/mh

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1995. Ezel checks current Florida tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace