Were patents, copyrights, trademarks, trade secrets, trade names, and service marks managed by a Florida subsidiary subject to Florida intangible tax?

Short answer No. Florida treated the listed intellectual-property rights as government-granted privileges closely related to franchises and concluded that they were not subject to intangible tax. The published ruling does not separately state whether royalties or license fees were exempt.
State
FL
Ruling
TAA 95C2-003
Tax type
Intangible Personal Property Tax
Issued
1995-01-19
Issued by
Florida Department of Revenue
Requested by
A redacted Florida intellectual-property subsidiary and its parent

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1995. Ask about yours and see what current Florida tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1995
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is an official Florida Technical Assistance Advisement applying the 1995 intangible-tax franchise exemption to specified intellectual-property rights managed by a Florida subsidiary. Under section 213.22, it binds the Department only for those facts. The published text does not separately resolve royalties or license fees. Asset type, ownership, domicile, licensing arrangements, receivables, or later law could change the result.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The listed intellectual-property rights were not subject to Florida intangible tax.

The Florida subsidiary owned and managed patents, copyrights, trade secrets, manufacturing processes, and related rights. The Department viewed patents, copyrights, trademarks, trade secrets, trade names, and service marks as government-granted privileges so closely related to franchises that they fell outside the tax under the cited franchise exemption analysis.

What this means for you

The holding addressed the intellectual-property rights themselves. Although the requester also asked about royalties and license fees, the published response did not separately decide those items.

Common questions

Q: Were the listed intellectual-property rights taxable? A: No.

Q: Did Florida compare them to franchises? A: Yes.

Q: Did the ruling expressly exempt royalties and license fees? A: No separate answer appears in the published text.

Citations and references

  • Fla. Stat. § 199.185(1)(b) — franchise exemption
  • Fla. Stat. ch. 199 — intangible personal property tax
  • Fla. Stat. § 213.22 — Technical Assistance Advisements

Source

Original ruling text

Jan 19, 1995

Re: Technical Assistance Advisement No. 95(C)2-003 Intangible Tax - Exemption - Intellectual Property Section 199.185(1)(b), F.S. XXX (Parent) XXX (Technologies)

Dear :

Your letter requesting a Technical Assistance Advisement has been referred to this office for response. Your specific request asked that it be determined that neither the intellectual property nor the royalties or license fees be held subject to the intangible tax.

Technologies owns and manages Parent's patents, copyrights and associated intellectual property including such items as trade secrets and manufacturing processes (the intellectual property). Technologies will be domiciled in Florida. From this location Technologies will license the use of the intellectual property to Parent and affiliates as well as unrelated third parties.

Section 199.185(1)(b), F.S., grants an exemption from tax to franchises. A franchise is defined in Black's Law Dictionary as "A privilege conferred by government on individual or corporation, and which does not belong to citizens of the country generally of common right.... A privilege granted or sold, such as to use a name or to sell products or services. The right given by a manufacturer or supplier to a retailer to use his product and name on terms and conditions mutually agreed upon.

"In its simplest terms, a franchise is a license from owner of a patent, copyright, trademark, trade secret or trade name permitting another to sell a product or service under that name or mark."

Franchises, patents, copyrights, trademarks, trade secrets, trade names, and service marks are special privileges granted by the government to an individual or corporation. Each represents a special right reserved to an individual or business by the government. These rights and privileges granted by the Government to the holders of patents, copyrights, trademarks, trade secrets, trade names and service marks are so closely related to franchises they are almost indistinguishable. As a result, these items have not been subjected to the intangible tax in the past and are not subject to the intangible tax under the current provisions of Ch. 199, F.S.

This response constitutes a Technical Assistance Advisement under s. 213.22, F.S., which is binding on the Department only under the facts and circumstances described in the request for this advice as specified in s. 213.22, F.S. Our response is predicated on those facts and the specific situation summarized above. You are advised that subsequent statutory or administrative rule changes or judicial interpretations of the statutes or rules upon which this advice is based may subject similar future transactions to a different treatment than expressed in this response.

You are further advised that this response and your request are public records under Chapter 119, F.S., which are subject to disclosure to the public under the conditions of s. 213.22, F.S. Your name, address, and any other details which might lead to identification of the taxpayer must be deleted by the Department before disclosure. In an effort to protect the confidentiality of such information, we request you notify the undersigned in writing within 15 days of any deletions you wish made to the request or the response.

Sincerely,

J.V. Parramore, Jr.
Tax Law Specialist
Technical Assistance

JVP/mh

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1995. Ezel checks current Florida tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace