Did a corporation retain Florida corporate-income-tax nexus when a Florida trustee managed its assets as assignee and litigated claims in Florida?
Apply this to your situation
This page answers the general question as of 1995. Ezel answers yours, under current Florida tax law, with citations.
Plain-English summary
The corporation had Florida corporate-income and emergency-excise-tax nexus because its Florida trustee managed and controlled the assets as assignee.
The trustee was responsible for protecting and preserving the corporation's assets, managing them for a reasonable return, distributing assets and income to creditors, and litigating claims in Florida federal courts. Those activities went beyond merely maintaining financial accounts in the state.
The Department said nexus might not exist if the corporation's Florida activities ceased and its only remaining assets were cash, demand deposits, certificates of deposit, repurchase agreements, and other securities passively held in a Florida bank or savings association.
What this means for you
Passive accounts alone were distinguished from active Florida management and litigation by a fiduciary acting for the corporation.
Common questions
Q: Did the Florida financial accounts alone create nexus?
A: The cited rule said maintaining bank accounts in Florida did not by itself create nexus.
Q: What activities created nexus here?
A: The Florida-domiciled trustee managed and protected the assets as assignee and conducted substantial litigation in Florida.
Q: Could nexus end?
A: The ruling said it might not exist if the active Florida conduct ceased and only the listed passive financial assets remained in Florida accounts.
Citations and references
- Fla. Stat. § 220.11 — corporate income tax and taxable privileges
- Fla. Admin. Code r. 12C-1.011(1)(n), (1)(o), and (2) — nexus activities and bank accounts
- Fla. Admin. Code r. 12C-1.015(11) — financial-organization factor treatment
- Fla. Stat. § 213.22 — Technical Assistance Advisements
Source
- Landing page: Florida Tax Law Library
- Advisement: TAA 95C1-007
Original ruling text
Aug 04, 1995
Re: Taxable Nexus; TAA 95(C)1-007
XXX (Corporation)
XXX (Estate)
Dear :
Your letter of May 23, 1995, requested a Technical Assistance
Advisement on the application of the corporate income tax to the
above referenced matter. This response to your request
constitutes a Technical Assistance Advisement under Chapter
12-11, Florida Administrative Code, and is issued to you under
the authority of s. 213.22, Florida Statutes.
A summary of the information provided appears below:
The Trust was created in 1985 by a Federal Bankruptcy
court, as part of a plan of reorganization, in order to
liquidate the assets of the Trust, the Corporation and the
Estate. The plan required the trustee to liquidate the real
estate and distribute all of the trust property to the
creditors of the various estates. The plan that was
adopted was submitted by the largest creditor, but it did
not address whether the trustee had to file income tax
returns, or pay any of the income taxes due at the federal
or state level.
Shortly after the plan was confirmed, as required by the
plan, the trustee caused the Trust property to be conveyed
to the largest creditor, for cash and cancellation of the
creditor's mortgage claims. The proceeds from the sale
were used to pay off third party creditors. Prior to the
plan of confirmation, Corporation also sold properties
located in Virginia, and these proceeds also went to the
creditors. In 1987, Corporation filed a consolidated tax
return for the fiscal year ended July 31, 1985; however,
the debtors requested the trustee to pay the taxes. In
late 1987, the trustee requested declaratory relief from
the Bankruptcy court with respect to his obligations. The
U.S. Government and the debtors opposed the trustee's
action, claiming the trustee was responsible for filing
returns and paying the tax. All of the lower courts and
the Court of Appeals agreed with the trustee. Eventually,
the case was appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court. The court
reversed and ruled that the trustee must file the required
federal income tax returns and pay the taxes due from both
the Estate and Corporation. The Supreme Court ruled that
the trustee is an assignee of the assets of the debtors.
Therefore, the assignee is to file such federal tax returns
as Corporation and Estate would have been required to file.
The requirement to file a federal return also makes the
trustee liable to pay the federal and state taxes for the
Corporation out of the available trust assets. The effect
of the ruling for federal tax purposes is to consider
Corporation as a taxpayer, and the trustee has the
fiduciary responsibility to file its corporate returns as
the assignee of all the corporate assets.
After the Supreme Court decision, the trustee entered into
lengthy negotiations with the federal government and state
governments in an attempt to quantify and measure the
income and other tax liabilities of each taxpayer for the
years 1985-1993. The settlements with Florida covered all
tax liabilities for Corporation and Trust through the years
ended July 31, 1993 and December 31, 1993, respectively.
In the years covered by the settlement agreement with
Florida, Corporation has nexus (commercial domicile and
business domicile). It conducted business in Florida. To
the best of the requester's knowledge Corporation is a
registered Delaware corporation, currently with no office,
operations or management functions in any state.
Corporation currently owns a limited number of assets,
which are being held in Florida banks and investment
accounts naming the assignee. Corporation's current assets
consist of cash, demand deposit accounts, certificates of
deposit, and repurchase agreements and other securities.
All are located exclusively within bank accounts and
brokerage accounts located in Florida. There is a
significant amount of time spent litigating various
matters, including creditor claims, professional fee
awards, etc. All claims are being litigated in federal
courts in Florida.
Request
Based upon the above facts, the following requests for
technical advice have been made:
- Does Corporation have Florida corporate income and
emergency excise tax nexus, based on the activities of
the assignee and/or location of its investments? - If Corporation is subject to the Florida corporate
income and emergency excise tax, based on the above
question, what facts would need to change so as to not
subject it to this tax for years starting after July
30, 1995?
Discussion Of Facts
Section 220.11, F.S., provides that a tax measured by net income
is imposed on every taxpayer in this state for the privilege of
conducting business, earning or receiving income in this state,
or being a resident or citizen of this state.
Rule 12C-1.011(2), F.A.C., provides that maintaining bank
accounts in banks and savings associations located in Florida
will not, in itself, create nexus with Florida.
Rule 12C-1.011(1)(n), F.A.C. provides that having corporate
officers who have permanent or extended temporary residence
within the state who make management decisions while residing in
the state will be construed as conducting business, earning or
receiving income in this state.
"Officer" is defined by Black's Law Dictionary as a "[p]erson
holding office of trust, command or authority in corporation,
government, armed services, or other institution or
organization."
Rule 12C-1.011(1)(o), F.A.C., provides that the selling,
managing, or providing of consulting services in Florida for
intangible assets creates taxable nexus.
Rule 12C-1.015(11), F.A.C., provides that any corporation whose
only activity consists of holding stock of corporations, bonds,
or other securities; earning interest on accounts maintained in
banks and savings associations, will be required to modify the
apportionment factors for property and sales as if the
corporation was a financial organization.
Discussion And Analysis Of Law
In the instant case, the assignee was appointed by the
Bankruptcy Court and is responsible to both the Bankruptcy Court
and the creditors. The activity of Corporation is to distribute
the assets and income to the creditors and the remainder, if
any, will revert back to Corporation.
A significant amount of time is spent litigating various matters
in federal courts in Florida, including creditor claims,
professional fee awards, etc.
The trustee is acting as assignee of all the assets of
Corporation and the litigation is to protect those assets. A
trustee has the fiduciary responsibility of protecting and
preserving the assets. This includes managing the assets to
receive a reasonable rate of return.
The Trustee is domiciled in Florida. Therefore, the Trustee, as
assignee, has management and control of the Trust assets and has
taxable nexus in Florida.
Should Corporation's activities in Florida cease, and
Corporation's assets consisting solely of cash, demand deposit
accounts, certificates of deposit, and repurchase agreements and
other securities simply be held in a Florida bank or savings
association, taxable nexus may not exist.
This response constitutes a Technical Assistance Advisement
under s. 213.22, F.S., which is binding on the Department only
under the facts and circumstances described in the request for
this advice as specified in s. 213.22, F.S. Our response is
based on those facts and the specific situation summarized
above. You are advised that subsequent statutory or
administrative rule changes or judicial interpretations of the
statutes or rules upon which this advice is based may subject
similar future transactions to a different treatment than
expressed in this response.
You are further advised that this response and your request are
public records under Chapter 119, F.S., which are subject to
disclosure to the public under the conditions of s. 213.22, F.S.
Your name, address, and any other details which might lead to
identification of the taxpayer must be deleted by the Department
before disclosure. In an effort to protect the confidentiality
of such information, we request you notify the undersigned in
writing within 15 days of any deletions you wish made to the
request or the response.
Sincerely,
Val Poliuto
Technical Assistant
Statutory Compliance Section
VJP/kk
Control# 21574
Enclosure
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read a 1995 ruling on this question. Ezel checks current Florida tax law and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.