FL TAA 95B4-008 Documentary Stamp Tax 1995-05-15

Did filing a Florida UCC-1 create documentary stamp tax when the note, security agreement, and other loan documents were executed and kept out of state?

Short answer: No. Filing the UCC-1 alone was not taxable unless the note, security agreement, or another obligatory document was also filed or recorded in Florida. The UCC-1 still had to state that proper stamp taxes had been or would be paid, or that no tax was required.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1995. Ezel answers yours, under current Florida tax law, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1995
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is an official Florida Technical Assistance Advisement applying the 1995 documentary-stamp statute and rule to a redacted out-of-state seller's notes, security agreements, crop liens, and UCC-1s executed outside Florida, with only the UCC-1 filed in Florida. Under section 213.22, it binds the Department only for those facts. Different execution, delivery, assignment, filing, recorded documents, notation, collateral, or later law could change the result.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Filing the UCC-1 financing statement alone did not trigger Florida documentary stamp tax.

The out-of-state seller and Florida buyers executed the note, security agreement, crop lien, and UCC-1 at the seller's out-of-state office. The note was payable there and was not sold, transferred, or assigned in Florida. Only the UCC-1 was filed in Florida because the collateral was located in the state.

The Department said tax would arise if the note, security agreement, or another obligatory document also was filed or recorded. Even when no tax was due, the UCC-1 needed a notation stating that proper taxes had been or would be placed on the promissory instruments, or that tax was not required.

What this means for you

The ruling distinguished a notice filing from recording the underlying debt instrument. The exact set of documents filed in Florida controlled the stated result.

Common questions

Q: Was filing the UCC-1 alone taxable?
A: No.

Q: What would change the result?
A: Filing or recording the note, security agreement, or another obligatory document in Florida.

Q: Was any statement required on the UCC-1?
A: Yes. It needed the rule's stamp-tax notation even if no tax was required.

Citations and references

  • Fla. Stat. § 201.08(1) — written obligations and recorded security instruments
  • Fla. Admin. Code r. 12B-4.053(33) — UCC-1 filing and stamp-tax notation
  • Fla. Stat. § 213.22 — Technical Assistance Advisements

Source

Original ruling text

May 15, 1995

Re: Technical Assistance Advisement No. 95(B)4-008
Documentary Stamp Tax; Filing Of UCC-1 Financing Statement
In Florida Securing Out-Of-State Transactions
XXX (Taxpayer)

Dear :

This is in response to your recent request for a technical
assistance advisement pursuant to s. 213.22, F.S., and Rule 1211.003, F.A.C.

The following is the statement of facts outlined in your
letter:

The Taxpayer which is an out-of-state company is selling
goods to Florida residents that purchase the goods at the
company's office in XXX. As to some of those purchases the
company agrees to accept installment payments and the
Florida residents sign a note, security agreement, crop
lien, and UCC-1 at the company's office in XXX. In other
words, the note, security agreement, crop lien, and UCC-1
are made, executed, delivered in XXX. The note is payable
in XXX and it is not sold, transferred, or assigned in this
state. However, since the company is dealing with Florida
residents and the property that is the security for the
debt is in this state, the UCC-1's are filed for record in
Florida.

The Taxpayer has been purchasing documentary stamps, based
upon the amount of the note, each time it has filed a UCC-1.

Requested Ruling

All documents were made, executed, and delivered out-ofstate. Is the filing of UCC-1 Financing Statement with the
Florida Secretary of State taxable?

Discussion and Law

Relevant to your petition, s. 201.08(1), F.S., provides
that:

On promissory notes, nonnegotiable notes, and written
obligations to pay money (hereinafter, called "notes")...
made, executed, delivered, sold, transferred, or assigned
in the state, and for each renewal of the same, the tax
shall be 35 cents on each $100 or fraction thereof of the
indebtedness or obligation evidenced thereby. On
mortgages, trust deeds, security agreements, or other
evidences of indebtedness filed or recorded in this state,
and for each renewal of the same, the tax shall be 35 cents
on each $100 or fraction thereof of the indebtedness or
obligation evidenced thereby.... (emphasis added)

As stated in Rule 12B-4.053(33), F.A.C, the filing or
recording of a UCC-1 Financing Statement is not taxable under s.
201.08(1), F.S., unless the note, security agreement or other
obligatory document is also filed or recorded. However, a
notation relative to stamp tax is required on the UCC-1
Financing Statement whether tax is due or not. The notation
shall state that proper stamp taxes under Ch. 201, F.S., have
been placed on the promissory instruments and will be placed on
any additional promissory instrument, or that tax is not
required.

Department's Position

The filing or recording in Florida of a UCC-1 Financing
Statement is not taxable under s. 201.08(1), F.S., unless the
note, security agreement or other obligatory document is also
filed or recorded.

This response constitutes a Technical Assistance Advisement
under s. 213.22, F.S., which is binding on the Department only
under the facts and circumstances described in the request for
this advice as specified in s. 213.22, F.S. Our response is
predicated on those facts and the specific situation summarized
above. You are advised that subsequent statutory or

administrative rule changes or judicial interpretations of the
statutes or rules upon which this advice is based may subject
similar future transactions to a different treatment than
expressed in this response.

You are further advised that this response and your request
are public records under Chapter 119, F.S., which are subject to
disclosure to the public under the conditions of s. 213.22, F.S.
Your name, address, and any other details which might lead to
identification of the taxpayer must be deleted by the Department
before disclosure. In an effort to protect the confidentiality
of such information, we request you notify the undersigned in
writing within 15 days of any deletions you wish made to the
request or the response.

Sincerely,

Baldan E. Sulker
Senior Tax Specialist
Technical Assistance

BES/mh

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 1995 ruling on this question. Ezel checks current Florida tax law and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.