Were shares of a business-trust fund exempt from Florida intangible tax when its portfolio held only tax-exempt assets?

Short answer Yes. Florida found the fund shares exempt if the trust's entire portfolio consisted solely of exempt Florida municipal obligations, U.S. government or agency securities, territorial obligations, and qualifying cash or cash equivalents.
State
FL
Ruling
TAA 94C2-012
Tax type
Intangible Personal Property Tax
Issued
1994-06-10
Issued by
Florida Department of Revenue
Requested by
A redacted Massachusetts business trust and investment fund

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1994. Ask about yours and see what current Florida tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1994
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is historical 1994 guidance under Florida's then-described annual intangible-tax rules for one redacted Massachusetts business trust whose fund portfolio was to consist solely of specified exempt securities and cash equivalents. Under section 213.22, it binds the Department only for those facts. Portfolio composition, asset exemption, valuation, trust form, or later law could change the result.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Subject

Valuation - Business Trust

Plain-English summary

The fund shares were exempt if the portfolio held only assets that were themselves exempt. The proposed investments were Florida municipal securities, U.S. government or agency obligations, territorial obligations, and cash or cash equivalents.

What this means for you

The ruling's all-exempt-asset condition was absolute. Introducing a nonexempt portfolio asset would present different facts.

Common questions

Did the trust's Massachusetts form prevent exemption? No.

What controlled the result? The portfolio consisting solely of exempt assets.

Citations and references

  • Fla. Stat. §§ 199.103(2), 199.185(1)(i), and 213.22
  • Fla. Admin. Code r. 12C-2.010(1)(i)-(j)

Source

Original ruling text

Jun 10, 1994

Re: Technical Assistance Advisement No. 94(C)2-012 Intangible Tax - Valuation - Business Trust Sections 199.103(2) & 199.185(1)(i), F.S. Rule 12C-2.010(1)(j), F.A.C. XXX (Trust) XXX (Fund)

Dear :

Your letter requesting a technical assistance advisement has been referred to this office.

Trust was created under the laws of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts under an agreement and declaration of trust commonly know as a "Massachusetts business trust." The Trust's objectives are to provide shareholders a high level of tax exempt income through investment in a portfolio of investment securities, the interest and dividends of which are exempt from federal income tax and Florida intangible tax. The Trust intends to achieve its objectives by investing in a portfolio of tax-exempt securities of the State of Florida, its political subdivisions and authorities. The Trust may also invest in obligations of the U.S. Government, its agencies, territories and possessions.

Based upon the statements and documents received you have requested a ruling of the taxability of the Fund based upon substantially the following question:

Will the shares of the Fund be exempt from the intangible tax if the portfolio of assets is invested solely in Florida Municipal Bonds, U.S. Government or its agency securities, territorial obligations and cash or cash equivalents?

This question is answered in the positive. Shares in this type of Fund are exempt from tax under Florida law if the

trust's portfolio of assets consists solely of assets that are exempt from tax [see s. 199.185(1)(i), F.S. and Rule 12C-2.010(1)(i), F.A.C.].

This response constitutes a Technical Assistance Advisement under s. 213.22, F.S., which is binding on the Department only under the facts and circumstances described in the request for this advice as specified in s. 213.22, F.S. Our response is predicated on those facts and the specific situation summarized above. You are advised that subsequent statutory or administrative rule changes or judicial interpretations of the statutes or rules upon which this advice is based may subject similar future transactions to a different treatment than expressed in this response.

You are further advised that this response and your request are public records under Chapter 119, F.S., which are subject to disclosure to the public under the conditions of s. 213.22, F.S. Your name, address, and any other details which might lead to identification of the taxpayer must be deleted by the Department before disclosure. In an effort to protect confidential information, we request you notify the undersigned in writing within 15 days of any deletions you wish made to the request or this response.

Sincerely,

J.V. Parramore, Jr.
Tax Law Specialist
Technical Assistance

JVP/mh

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1994. Ezel checks current Florida tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace