FL TAA 94B4-018 Documentary Stamp Tax 1994-11-22

What did this obsolete ruling say about deeding mortgaged property to a limited partnership owned by the transferors?

Short answer: The 1994 ruling treated the deed as taxable on fair market value even though the spouses remained general partners and liable on the mortgage. The official source now marks that conclusion obsolete and directs readers to PMR Resorts.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1994. Ezel answers yours, under current Florida tax law, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1994
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: The official Florida source marks this Technical Assistance Advisement obsolete and directs readers to Department of Revenue v. PMR Resorts, Inc., 868 So. 2d 621 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004). The original fair-market-value conclusion should not be treated as current guidance. It bound the Department only for the described spouses, partnership interests, deed, mortgage liability, and 1994 law. Identifying details are redacted.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Subject

Deeds to Limited Partnership

Plain-English summary

This ruling is obsolete. In 1994, the Department concluded that a deed from spouses to a limited partnership in which they were general partners was taxable on the property's fair market value. The spouses' continuing mortgage liability and ownership through the partnership did not reduce the original tax base.

The official source now directs readers to Department of Revenue v. PMR Resorts, Inc., 868 So. 2d 621 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004). The 1994 holding is therefore historical and should not be used as current guidance.

What this means for you

Do not apply the original fair-market-value conclusion to a present partnership transfer without reviewing PMR Resorts and current law. The official obsolescence label controls the page's reliance warning.

Common questions

What was the original ruling? The deed was taxable on fair market value under the partnership-transfer rule.

Did continued mortgage liability change that result? Not under the original 1994 analysis.

Is that analysis current? No. The Department marks the ruling obsolete.

Citations and references

  • Fla. Stat. §§ 201.02(1), 201.02(5), and 213.22
  • Fla. Admin. Code r. 12B-4.013(9)
  • Department of Revenue v. PMR Resorts, Inc., 868 So. 2d 621 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004)

Source

Original ruling text

Obsolete; See Department of Revenue v. PMR Resorts, Inc.,
868 So.2d 621 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004)

Nov 22, 1994

Re: Technical Assistance Advisement No. 94(B)4-018
Documentary Stamp Tax; Deeds to Limited Partnership
XXX (Client)
XXX (Wife)

Dear :

You have petitioned for a Technical Assistance Advisement
pursuant to s. 213.22, F.S., and Florida Administrative Code Rule
12-11.003.

Issue

Whether a deed from your client and his wife, subject to a
mortgage in their names, to a limited partnership, in which they are
the general partners and will remain liable on the mortgage, is
subject to tax under section 201.02, F.S.

Background

Currently your clients own real property subject to a mortgage
in their own names. They desire to transfer the property to a
limited partnership in which they are the general partners and will
remain liable on the mortgage after the transfer. They will then
make gifts of the limited partnership interest to their children.
Over the years the children will own most of the property through
ownership of the partnership interest.

Your position is that the deed from your clients to the limited
partnership will require only the minimum documentary stamp tax
since the property will be owned before and after the transfer by
the same individuals. You believe that the transfer is exempt based

on the fact that although there may be a change in the form of the
obligation there is no change in substance. Your clients will be no
more or less liable on the mortgage after the conveyance than before
and will in fact own 100 percent of the property after the transfer,
only in a different form. You rely on Straughn v. Story, 334 So. 2d
337, State, Dept of Rev. v. Zuckerman-Vernon Corp., 354 So.2d 353,
and Abramson v. Straughn, 348 So.2d 1172.

Discussion and Law

The tax levied by s. 201.02(1), F.S., is an excise tax on
deeds, instruments, or writings transferring any interest in real
property. The tax shall be 70 cents per each $100 of consideration.
For purposes of this section, consideration includes money paid or
to be paid, the discharge of any obligation, the amount of any
mortgage, purchased money mortgage, or other encumbrance. If the
consideration is other than money, the consideration shall be
presumed to be the fair market value of the real property being
transferred. In addition, s. 201.02(5), F.S., provides that all
transfers of real property from a partnership to a partner after
July 1, 1986, are taxable based on the value of the real property
transferred unless the partner receiving the property is the same
partner that deeded the property to the partnership.

Rule 12B-4.013(9), F.A.C., provides that a conveyance of real
property in exchange for an interest in a partnership, or where the
value of the partnership is increased by the conveyance, is taxable
based on the fair market value of the property transferred.

Since the court cases cited by you are prior to the statute
change effective on July 1, 1986, taxing transfers on real property
to or from a partnership and prior to the statute change effective
July 1, 1990, defining consideration to include the value of the
real property transferred, they are no longer applicable.

Department's Position

Therefore, the deed from your clients to the limited
partnership will be taxable based on the fair market value of the
property being transferred pursuant to Rule 12B-4.013(9), F.A.C.

This response constitutes a Technical Assistance Advisement
under s. 213.22, F.S., which is binding on the Department only under
the facts and circumstances described in the request for this advice
as specified in s. 213.22, F.S. Our response is predicated on those
facts and the specific situation summarized above. You are advised
that subsequent statutory or administrative rule changes or judicial
interpretations of the statutes or rules upon which this advice is
based may subject similar future transactions to a different
treatment than expressed in this response.

You are further advised that this response and your request are
public records under Chapter 119, F.S., which are subject to
disclosure to the public under the conditions of s. 213.22, F.S.
Your name, address, and any other details which might lead to
identification of the taxpayer must be deleted by the Department
before disclosure. In an effort to protect the confidentiality of
such information, we request you notify the undersigned in writing
within 15 days of any deletions you wish made to the request or the
response.

Sincerely,
Tax Law Specialist

James E. Silvey
Technical Assistance

JES/JES

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 1994 ruling on this question. Ezel checks current Florida tax law and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.