Was additional Florida documentary stamp tax due when property was taken subject to, but without assuming, an existing mortgage?

Short answer No. Because the deed tax had been paid on the full consideration including the mortgage and neither the deed nor another document showed that the purchaser assumed the debt, Florida found no additional tax due under section 201.08.
State
FL
Ruling
TAA 94B4-009
Tax type
Documentary Stamp Tax
Issued
1994-07-22
Issued by
Florida Department of Revenue
Requested by
A redacted purchaser of Florida real property taken subject to an existing mortgage

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1994. Ask about yours and see what current Florida tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1994
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is historical 1994 guidance for one redacted 1982 deed that included an existing mortgage in total consideration but did not transfer or assume the mortgage debt. Under section 213.22, it binds the Department only for those facts. Any assumption language, separate debt instrument, different consideration, tax payment, execution, or later law could change the result.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Subject

Deed Subject to Mortgage

Plain-English summary

No additional documentary stamp tax was due under section 201.08 merely because the purchaser took the property subject to an existing mortgage. The purchaser did not assume the mortgage, and neither the deed nor any other submitted document showed an assumption.

The deed tax under section 201.02 had already been computed on the full purchase consideration, including the mortgage encumbering the property. With that tax paid and no assumption of the debt, the Department found no additional section 201.08 tax.

What this means for you

The ruling distinguishes taking property subject to a mortgage from legally assuming the mortgage obligation. It also depends on the deed tax having been paid on total consideration, including the encumbrance.

Common questions

Was the existing mortgage included in deed consideration? Yes.

Did the buyer assume the mortgage debt? No.

Would an assumption document matter? Yes. The ruling's conclusion depended on no assumption appearing in the deed or in any separate recorded or unrecorded document.

Citations and references

  • Fla. Stat. §§ 201.02, 201.08, and 213.22
  • Fla. Admin. Code rr. 12B-4.013(25), 12B-4.052(11), and 12B-4.053(19)

Source

Original ruling text

Jul 22, 1994

Re: Technical Assistance Advisement No. 94(B)4-009 Documentary Stamp Tax, Deed Subject to Mortgage Section 201.08, F.S. XXX (Hereinafter Purchaser) XXX (Hereinafter Seller)

Dear :

This is in response to your request dated May 10, 1994 requesting an opinion from this office on substantially the following question:

ISSUE

If no mortgage or other debt was assumed, there were no other outstanding encumbrances against the property at the time of purchase, and proper documentary stamp taxes were paid on the total consideration for the purchase including any and all encumbrances which the property was subject to plus any other property involved in the purchase, are any documentary stamp taxes due on the deed regarding the mortgage taken subject to?

BACKGROUND

According to the technical assistance advisement request, Purchaser was a XXX limited partnership authorized to do business in Florida by the Secretary of State.

Seller conveyed the XXX property on December 17, 1982 to the Purchaser subject to the existing mortgage identified in Exhibit B recorded with the deed in OR Book XXX Page XX. The total purchase price of the property was stated as $XX including the mortgage on the property with an original principal balance of $XX. The mortgage was not assumed, but the property was simply taken subject to the outstanding mortgage. Documentary stamp tax at the rate of $.45 per $100.00 ($XX) of consideration

was paid on recordation of the deed.

DISCUSSION AND LAW

Section 201.02, F.S., requires documentary stamp tax on the total consideration for a deed including mortgages encumbering the property. In December, 1982 in XXX Florida, documentary stamp tax at the rate of $.45 per $100.00 of consideration was paid on recordation of the deed. The deed stated that the property was taken subject to the named mortgage. The request stated that the mortgage was not assumed. Pursuant to Rule 12B4.013(25), F.A.C., documentary stamp tax was computed (on the full consideration, $XX, for the deed) including the mortgage encumbering the property.

Neither the deed nor any other document submitted (whether recorded or not) showed that the existing mortgage was assumed. Therefore no tax under s. 201.08, F.S., at the then rate of $.15 per $100.00 was charged or paid on recordation of the deed.

Pursuant to Rules 12B-4.052(11) and 12B-4.053(19), F.A.C., if a mortgage is not assumed either in the deed or in a separate document, recorded or not recorded, no tax under s. 201.08, F.S., is due.

DEPARTMENT'S POSITION

Where proper documentary stamp tax is paid on the total consideration for the deed including any mortgages encumbering the property, and the mortgage(s) are not assumed, no documentary stamp tax is due under s. 201.08, F.S.

This response constitutes a Technical Assistance Advisement under s. 213.22, F.S., which is binding on the Department only under the facts and circumstances described in the request for this advice as specified in s. 213.22, F.S. Our response is predicated on those facts and the specific situation summarized above. You are advised that subsequent statutory or administrative rule changes or judicial interpretations of the statutes or rules upon which this advice is based may subject similar future transactions to a different treatment than

expressed in this response.

You are further advised that this response and your request are public records under Chapter 119, F.S., which are subject to disclosure to the public under the conditions of s. 213.22, F.S. Your name, address, and any other details which might lead to identification of the taxpayer must be deleted by the Department before disclosure. In an effort to protect the confidentiality of such information, we request you notify the undersigned in writing within 15 days of any deletions you wish made to the request or the response.

Sincerely,

M.E. Clemens
Tax Audit Specialist III
Technical Assistance

MEC/mh

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1994. Ezel checks current Florida tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace