FL TAA 93C2-004 Intangible Personal Property Tax 1993-01-25

Did Florida's original ruling exempt an out-of-state municipal bond fund and its shares under the former intangible tax?

Short answer: Yes, it answered all three questions affirmatively, but the official source says revised TAA 93C2-004R superseded this original ruling on February 24, 1993.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1993. Ezel answers yours, under current Florida tax law, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1993
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: The official source states that revised TAA 93C2-004R superseded this original January 1993 Florida Technical Assistance Advisement on February 24, 1993. Do not treat this version as the final ruling in the sequence. It also bound the Department only for the named fund, portfolio, Florida contacts, and facts under section 213.22.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Subject

Valuation - Business Trust

Plain-English summary

The original ruling answered all three fund-exemption questions affirmatively, but the official source says revised TAA 93C2-004R superseded it. It said fund shares were fully exempt when the valuation-date portfolio contained only qualifying Florida, federal, agency, instrumentality, or territorial obligations.

It also said nonexempt securities held earlier in the year did not prevent exemption if the fund held solely exempt securities at the valuation point, and that the fund's own assets were exempt because it was an out-of-state investment company with no Florida location or personnel.

What this means for you

This page records the first ruling in the sequence. The revised ruling superseded it less than a month later, so this version should not be treated as the Department's final statement for the fund.

Common questions

Q: What did the original ruling decide? It answered all three requested questions yes.

Q: Did earlier nonexempt holdings defeat year-end exemption? Not under this version if only exempt securities remained at the prescribed valuation point.

Q: Is this the final version? No. The source identifies TAA 93C2-004R as the superseding revision.

Citations and references

  • Fla. Stat. §§ 199.032, 199.103, 199.185(1)(d), (g), (i) — former intangible tax and exemptions
  • Fla. Stat. § 213.22 — Technical Assistance Advisements

Source

Original ruling text

Status: Superseded by TAA 93C2-004R (Revised), February 24,
1993.

Jan 25, 1993

Re: Technical Assistance Advisement No. 93(C)2-004
Intangible Tax - Valuation - Business Trust
Sections 199.103(2) and 199.185(1)(i), F.S.
XXX (the Fund)

Dear :

This is in response to your recent request for a technical
assistance advisement regarding the application of the Florida
intangible personal property tax to shares in the Fund and to
assets of the Fund.

Facts

The Fund is a newly organized closed-end management company
that will be registered under the Investment Company Act of
1940, as amended. The Fund was created under the laws of the
Commonwealth of Massachusetts under a declaration of trust dated
December 29, 1992, as what is commonly known as a Massachusetts
business trust. The principal business office of the Fund, from
which the Fund's assets will be managed, is located in
Minneapolis, Minnesota.

The Fund intends to invest substantially all of its assets
in tax-exempt municipal obligations issued by the State of
Florida, its instrumentalities, and political subdivisions. For
defensive purposes, the Fund also reserves the right to invest
any percent of its total assets in other federally tax-exempt
securities or in U.S. government securities. The investment
objective of the Fund is to provide current income exempt from
regular federal income tax by investing in Florida municipal
obligations exempt from the Florida intangible personal property
tax.

Requested Advisement

  1. Will shares of the Fund be wholly exempt from the tax
    on intangible personal property imposed by s. 199.032,
    F.S., if on January 1 of each year the portfolio of
    the Fund consists solely of obligations of the State
    of Florida, its political subdivisions and agencies,
    and the United States Government, its agencies,
    instrumentalities, and territories?
  2. If the Fund holds non-exempt securities at any time
    during the calendar year, but on the last business day
    of such calendar year holds solely exempt securities,
    will shares of the Fund be wholly exempt from the
    intangible personal property tax?
  3. Will the Fund be exempt from the tax on intangible
    personal property imposed by s. 199.032, F.S.?

Discussion and Law

  1. Section 199.185(1)(i), F.S., states that units of a
    unit investment trust organized under an agreement or
    declaration of trust and registered under the
    Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, whose
    portfolio of assets consists solely of assets exempt
    under this section shall be exempt from the tax
    imposed under s. 199.032, F.S. Notes, bonds and other
    obligations issued by the State of Florida or its
    municipalities, counties, and other taxing districts,
    or by the United States Government and its agencies
    are exempt as provided in s. 199.185(1)(d), F.S.
  2. Section 199.103, F.S., states that all intangible
    personal property shall be subject to the annual tax
    at its just valuation as of January 1 of each year,
    unless exempt under s. 199.185, F.S.
  3. Section 199.185(1)(g), F.S., exempts the assets owned
    by a company organized under the Investment Company
    Act of 1940. The Fund will have no location,
    employees, agents or representatives in the State of
    Florida. Further, the principal business location of
    the Fund is outside of Florida.

Conclusion

Based on the applicable statutory provisions, all three
questions are answered in the affirmative.

This response constitutes a Technical Assistance Advisement
under s. 213.22, F.S., which is binding on the Department only
under the facts and circumstances described in the request for
this advice as specified in s. 213.22, F.S. Our response is
predicated on those facts and the specific situation summarized
above. You are advised that subsequent statutory or
administrative rule changes or judicial interpretations of the
statutes or rules upon which this advice is based may subject
similar future transactions to a different treatment than
expressed in this response.

You are further advised that this response and your request
are public records under Chapter 119, F.S., which are subject to
disclosure to the public under the conditions of s. 213.22, F.S.
Your name, address, and any other details which might lead to
identification of the taxpayer must be deleted by the Department
before disclosure. In an effort to protect the confidentiality
of such information, we request you notify the undersigned in
writing within 15 days of any deletions you wish made to the
request or the response.

Sincerely,

Nadine C. Posey
Technical Assistant
Technical Assistance

NCP/mh

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 1993 ruling on this question. Ezel checks current Florida tax law and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.