Was an executed promissory note held for possible funding under a letter of credit subject to Florida documentary stamp tax even if no funds were advanced?

Short answer Yes. Florida found the executed note contained an absolute promise to pay a stated sum, so tax was due and had to be affixed when the note was executed even if the contingency never occurred and no funds were advanced. The separate letter of credit was not taxable where it lacked an executed written promise to pay a stated sum.
State
FL
Ruling
TAA 84B4-003
Tax type
Documentary Stamp Tax
Issued
1994-06-29
Issued by
Florida Department of Revenue
Requested by
A redacted bank holding a borrower's promissory note with a contingent letter-of-credit arrangement

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1994. Ask about yours and see what current Florida tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1994
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is historical guidance dated June 29, 1994 on one redacted bank's note and letter-of-credit documents described in requests dating from 1984. Under section 213.22, it binds the Department only for the exact promise, stated sum, execution, delivery, contingency, and safekeeping facts. Different document language, signature, funding, delivery, tax-affixing procedure, or later law could change the result.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Subject

Promissory Note with Letter of Credit

Plain-English summary

The executed promissory note was taxable even though no money had been advanced and the triggering contingency might never occur. The Department found that the note itself contained an absolute written promise to pay a specific sum and was executed by the borrower.

The separate letter of credit was not taxable where it did not contain the debtor's executed written obligation to pay a stated sum. Merely collecting and holding money for documentary tax was not enough; the tax had to be affixed to the taxable note when executed.

What this means for you

The ruling looked at the four corners of each document. A contingent commercial arrangement did not make an otherwise absolute signed note contingent for documentary-stamp purposes.

Common questions

Did the bank have to wait until funds were advanced? No.

Was the letter of credit itself taxable? No, on the described language and execution facts.

Could the bank hold a tax reserve and return it if nothing was funded? No. The ruling required tax to be affixed when the taxable note was executed.

Citations and references

  • Fla. Stat. §§ 201.08(1), 201.09, and 213.22
  • Fla. Admin. Code rr. 12B-4.05, 12B-4.51(1)(a), 12B-4.52(6), 12B-4.53(29), and 12B-4.54(19)

Source

Original ruling text

Jun 29, 1994

Re: Technical Assistance Advisement #84(B)4-003 Promissory Note with Letter of Credit

Dear

This is in response to your March 23, 1984 request for a Technical Assistance Advisement concerning the taxability of the following transaction and the promissory note attached to your request. From your February 3, 1984 request, you gave the following information:

"... the necessity for providing for documentary tax stamps when a letter of credit is issued in lieu of a surety bond containing a promise to pay a sum only in the event of a happening of a named contingency (12B-454(19)8) and a promissory note is held in safekeeping by the Bank for the convenience of the customer. Willingness to hold the promissory note, in this case, reflects a commitment on the part of the Bank to lend to the customer only if necessary to cover the contingency. If the contingency occurs, the customer may request funding under the commitment or he may pay for the contingency out of pocket. If the contingency never happens - no obligation to pay exists under the letter of credit or the note. No obligation to pay under the note exists unless the customer elects to borrow to pay for an occurred contingency. "Our current practice is to provide for the payment of the documentary tax to cover the Bank if the note is funded or an acceptance is created. If neither of these two options are elected by the customer and the letter of credit expires, no obligation to pay under the note was created, the contingency note held in safekeeping is cancelled and returned to the customer along with the contingency provision for the documentary tax."

You asked the following questions:

"If no monies are ever funded under a note which is held in safekeeping for the convenience of the customer in the event of a contingency which never occurs, is a provision for documentary tax stamps required? "If the provision is required, may the provision be returned to the customer if the term of the contingency expires without the occurrence of the contingency?"

Rules 12B-4.51(1)(a) and 12B-4.52(6), F.A.C., provide:

"(1) Scope of Tax:
"(a) A tax is imposed on promissory notes, non-negotiable notes, written obligations to pay money, assignments of salaries, wages, or other compensation, which are made, executed, delivered, sold, transferred or assigned in the state. A renewal note is also taxable unless it qualifies for the exemption provided for under Section 201.09(1), F.S. (See Rule 12B-4.54(1)) The rate of tax is 15 cents on each $100 or fraction thereof of the indebtedness or obligation evidenced by the document. "(6) Written Obligation or Promise to Pay Money: The tax levied by Section 201.08(1), F.S., is an excise tax on the promise to pay and the terms and certainty of payment are not material. (Plymouth Citrus Growers Ass'n. v. Lee (1946) 157 Fla. 893, 27 So.2d 415). `Obligation to pay money' refers to a direct written promise to pay stated sum and not to the duty that may be established by extrinsic facts. (Lee v. Kenan (1935) 78 F..2d 425, 100 ALR 869) It is necessary that documents be signed by the obligor. (Lee v. Quincy State Bank (1937) 127 Fla. 765, 173 So. 909)"

Also, Rule 12B-4.53(29), F.A.C., provides:

"(29) Note Executed and Delivered: All notes or written obligations to pay money delivered to the lender, including, but not limited to, master notes, and notes drawn in connection with a line of credit, letter of credit, bail bond or otherwise, executed in Florida or approved and accepted in Florida, are subject to Florida documentary stamp tax. Tax is due based on the face amount of the note whether or not funds are advanced at time of

delivery. If the note is secured by a recorded mortgage, stamps shall be affixed to the mortgage at time of recording and a notation made on the note that proper stamps and amount thereof are affixed to the mortgage. Renewals are also taxable unless exempted under Section 201.09, F.S."

Further, Rule 12B-4.54(19), F.A.C., provides:

"(19) Surety Bonds: Surety bonds which are to insure the doing of certain things required by the conditions of such bonds and which contain a promise to pay a sum only in the event of the happening of the named contingency are not taxable. (Attorney General Opinion 044-356, Dec. 6, 1944, 1943-44 Biennial Report, Page 224)"

Therefore, a letter of credit that is given to a customer from your bank that does not contain a written obligation to pay a stated sum and is not executed by the debtor is not taxable. However, the promissory note that is executed by the borrower that contains a specific promise to pay a stated sum and is executed by the debtor is taxable even though funds are not advanced. Your note does not contain a contingency as to the promise to pay, but merely states how and when advances and payments will be made. Since the note is an absolute promise to pay, documentary stamp tax must be paid and affixed to the note at the time the note is executed. The fact that you have collected the tax and are holding them will not satisfy the requirements under Rule 12B-4.05, F.A.C., which requires the tax to be affixed to the taxable document upon execution or a penalty can be assessed.

This response constitutes a technical assistance advisement under s. 213.22, F.S., which is binding on the department only under the facts and circumstances described in the request for this advice as specified in s. 213.22, F.S. Our response is predicated on those facts and the specific situation summarized above. You are advised that subsequent statutory or administrative rule changes or judicial interpretations of the statutes or rules upon which this advice is based may subject similar future transactions to a different treatment than

expressed in this response.

You are further advised that this response and your request are public records under Chapter 119, F.S., which are subject to disclosure to the public under the conditions of s. 213.22, F.S. Your name, address, and any other details which might lead to identification of the taxpayer must be deleted by the department before disclosure. In an effort to protect confidential information, we request you notify the undersigned in writing within 15 days of any deletions you wish made to the request or this response.

Sincerely,

James E. Silvey
Technical Assistant

JES/ll
Enclosures

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1994. Ezel checks current Florida tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace