FL TAA 15A-019 Sales and Use Tax 2015-11-23

How should a door supplier and installer structure and tax lump-sum versus retail-sale-plus-installation contracts?

Short answer: Contract terms controlled. A nonitemized finished-job contract was generally lump sum, so the contractor paid tax on materials and did not tax the customer. A properly itemized retail-sale-plus-installation contract required customer tax on materials.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 2015. Ezel answers yours, under current Florida tax law, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 2015
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is an official Technical Assistance Advisement of the Florida Department of Revenue, issued to a requester under section 213.22, Florida Statutes, on the facts and circumstances described in the request. The advisement's standard closing states that it binds the Department only under those facts and circumstances and that later statutory or administrative-rule changes or judicial interpretations may produce a different result. Identifying details may be redacted. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice. Consult a licensed Florida tax professional about your specific facts.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The Florida Department of Revenue explained that tax treatment for this door, frame, and hardware installer depended on how each real-property contract was structured.

When the contract did not identify and price all materials before work began and instead promised a completed job for one price, it was generally a lump-sum contract. The contractor was the ultimate consumer, paid tax when buying or manufacturing materials, and did not collect tax from the property owner.

A retail-sale-plus-installation contract required specifically described and priced materials plus separately determined labor. Under that structure, the contractor collected tax from the customer on the material sale. Materials-only sales were taxable, and the invoice had to separately state Florida sales tax.

What this means for you

Door and fixture contractors

Make contract language match actual billing. A partial or incomplete material list does not satisfy the itemization requirements for retail-sale-plus-installation treatment.

Property owners

Understand whether the contractor is taxing your material purchase or paying tax as the ultimate consumer under a lump-sum job.

Accountants and tax professionals

Review fabrication, installation, invoicing, and separate tax statement requirements together. The contract terms govern the result.

Common questions

Q: Who paid tax under a lump-sum real-property contract?
A: The contractor paid tax on materials.

Q: When did the customer pay sales tax on materials?
A: Under a properly itemized retail-sale-plus-installation contract or a materials-only sale.

Q: Must tax be separately stated on materials-only invoices?
A: Yes.

Citations and references

  • Fla. Stat. §§ 212.05, 212.07(2), and 213.22
  • Fla. Admin. Code rr. 12A-1.043 and 12A-1.051

Source

Original ruling text

Executive Director
Marshall Stranburg

QUESTION 1: SHOULD TAXPAYER USE A LUMP SUM CONTRACT INSTEAD OF A
RETAIL SALE PLUS INSTALLATION CONTRACT WHEN CONTRACTING WITH
CUSTOMERS WHERE AN ITEMIZED LIST OF MATERIALS TO BE USED IN THE
PERFORMANCE OF THE CONTRACT IS NOT PROVIDED?

-

ANSWER 1: IF THE TAXPAYER CANNOT PROVIDE AN ITEMIZED LIST OF
MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES AT THE INCEPTION OF A CONTRACT, OR THE
CONTRACT DOES NOT OTHERWISE QUALIFY AS A "RETAIL SALE PLUS
INSTALLMENT CONTRACT," THEN THE CONTRACT IS USUALLY CATEGORIZED AS
A LUMP-SUM CONTRACT.
QUESTION 2: SHOULD TAXPAYER CONTINUE TO COLLECT SALES TAX FROM ITS
CUSTOMERS ON THE CHARGES MADE TO CUSTOMERS FOR THE REAL PROPERTY
IMPROVEMENTS DESCRIBED ABOVE?
ANSWER 2: YES, UNLESS THE CONTRACT IS STRUCTURED AS A LUMP-SUM REAL
PROPERTY CONTRACT.
QUESTION 3: DOES TAXPAYER OWE SALES TAX ON THE MATERIALS IT USES
FULFILLING THE REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENTS CONTRACTS? (IF SO, SHOULD
RULE 12A-1.043, F.A.C. APPLY?)
ANSWER 3: YES.
QUESTION 4: IS TAXPAYER REQUIRED TO SEPARATELY LIST THE APPLICABLE
AMOUNT OF SALES TAX DUE ON CONTRACTS THAT ARE FOR MATERIALS ONLY?
ANSWER 4: UNDER S. 212.07(2), F.S., TAXPAYER MUST COMPLY AND IS REQUIRED
TO SEPARATELY STATE SALES TAX FROM THE PRICE OF THE GOOD(S) SOLD.
November 23, 2015
Re:

Technical Assistance Advisement No. 15A-019
XXX (“Taxpayer”)
Sales and Use Tax - Sales of Tangible Personal Property & Installation Labor
Section 212.05 and 212.07, Florida Statutes (“F.S.”)
Rule 12A-1.051, Florida Administrative Code (“F.A.C.”)

Child Support – Ann Coffin, Director  General Tax Administration – Maria Johnson, Director
Property Tax Oversight – Dr. Maurice Gogarty, Director  Information Services – Damu Kuttikrishnan, Director

http://dor.myflorida.com/dor/
Florida Department of Revenue
Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0100

Technical Assistance Advisement

2

Dear:
This letter is a response to your petition dated July 21, 2015, for the Florida Department of
Revenue's ("Department") issuance of a Technical Assistance Advisement concerning the
above referenced party and matter. Your petition has been carefully examined and the
Department finds it to be in compliance with the requisite criteria set forth in Chapter 12-11,
Florida Administrative Code. This response to your request constitutes a TAA and is issued to
you under the authority of s. 213.22, F.S.
Stated Facts and Requested Advisement
Your letter dated July 21, 2015, represents:
XXX Taxpayer XXX provides hollow metal frames, wood doors, hollow metal
doors, and supporting hardware from a facility located in Florida. Taxpayer
also installs the doors during new construction or renovation projects. We are
writing, pursuant to Rule 12-11, Florida Administrative Code, to request a
Technical Assistance Advisement ("TAA") concerning the application of sales
and use tax to transactions conducted by Taxpayer.
Currently, when Taxpayer is contracted to supply and install doors, the contract
lists: the lump sum price for material, labor and equipment which will be used
during the job. The lump sum price also include[s] the sales tax. However, an
itemized listing of materials is not expressly stated in the contract. While the
contract submittals provide a list of item specifications and a list of items to be
used in the contract, it is not an exhaustive list of materials to be used.
Moreover, all materials are not itemized. For example, the contract enclosed
herewith as Appendix 1 is a copy of a recent contract used by the Taxpayer
which is indicative of the contracts it often uses for similar transactions. The
provided contract merely lists the grossed up contract price which includes all
labor, materials, equipment, supervision, and taxes, sales or otherwise….
Based on the foregoing information, Taxpayer's contracts are structured as a
"retail sale plus installation" contract. Under a retail sale plus installation
contract, as detailed in Rule 12A-1.051(3)(d). Florida Administrative Code, a
contractor contracts to sell specifically described and itemized materials and
supplies at an agreed upon price, and provides for payment for labor either at a
separate agreed upon price or on the basis of time consumed. All materials that
will be incorporated in the work must be itemized and priced before work
begins. If a contractor itemizes some materials but does not itemize other
materials that will be incorporated into the work, the contractor will be liable
for sales tax on all the personal property sold. Contractors who enter retail
sales plus installation contracts are not considered the ultimate consumer of
tangible personal property and are not responsible for sales and use tax.

Technical Assistance Advisement

3

However, pursuant to Rule 12A-1.051(17)(k), Florida Administrative Code,
contractors who install door and window installation or perform on-site repair
are generally considered to be real property contractors. Generally, under Rule
12A-1.051(4), Florida Administrative Code, real property contractors are the
ultimate consumers of materials and supplies.…
Therefore, in instances where Taxpayer is contracted to supply materials, and
installation, it should contract with its customers using a "lump sum" contract

  • as defined by Rule 12A-1.051(3)(a), [F.A.C.] - instead of a retail sale plus
    installation contract for contracts where itemization of all materials is not
    provided to the customer.
    You ask us to provide guidance as to the following questions:
    1. Should Taxpayer use a lump sum contract instead of a retail sale plus installation
    contract when contracting with customers where an itemized list of materials to be used
    in the performance of the contract is not provided?

-

  1. Should Taxpayer continue to collect sales tax from its customers on the charges made
    to customers for the real property improvements described above?
  2. Does Taxpayer owe sales tax on the materials it uses fulfilling the real property
    improvements contracts? (if so, should Rule 12A-1.043, F.A.C. apply?)
  3. Is Taxpayer required to separately list the applicable amount of sales tax due on
    contracts that are for materials only?
    Discussion and Response
    When dealers of tangible personal property also contract to install those items, in such a way
    that the installation creates a fixture, or real property improvement, the sales tax consequences
    may produce two different results. First, if the dealer merely sells the tangible personal property,
    sales tax must be collected from the customer and remitted by the dealer. See s. 212.05(1)(a),
    F.S. However, if the dealer also installs the property, the dealer may become the customer of the
    tangible personal property, which requires the dealer to pay the sales tax to its supplier. See Rule
    12A-1.051(10), F.A.C. In these cases, the dealer becomes a “real property contractor”1 and is
    not merely a dealer of tangible personal property.
    First, when a dealer merely sells tangible personal property which may become a fixture, sales
    tax must be collected and remitted. As such, Rule 12A-1.051, F.A.C., has applicability to this
    type of transaction. This is made clear in the language of Rule 12A-1.051(1), F.A.C.:
    Scope of the rule. This rule governs the taxability of the purchase, sale, or use of
    tangible personal property by contractors and subcontractors who purchase,
    acquire, or manufacture materials and supplies for use in the performance of real
    property contracts . . .
    1

See Rule 12A-1.051(2)(h)1., F.A.C.

Technical Assistance Advisement

4

Therefore, if the dealer is not also making an installation that results in a real property
improvement, the dealer will collect and remit sales tax from the customer. 2
Second, when the dealer also installs the tangible personal property in a transaction which is
classified as a real property improvement, then the general rule is that contractors are liable for
the sales tax as the ultimate consumers. See Rule 12A-1.051(4), F.A.C. To begin this analysis,
Rule 12A-1.051(2)(h)1, F.A.C., states:
Real property contract means an agreement, oral or written, whether on a lump
sum, time and materials, cost plus, guaranteed price, or any other basis, to:
a. Erect, construct, alter, repair, or maintain any building, other structure, road,
project, development, or other real property improvement; . . .
The taxability of purchase and sales by real property contractors is determined by the pricing
arrangements in the contract. Rule 12A-1.051(3), F.A.C., creates five contractual classifications,
each based upon the contractual structure of the transaction involving real property contracts.
(a) Lump sum contracts. These are contracts in which a contractor or
subcontractor agrees to furnish materials and supplies and necessary services for a
single stated lump sum price.
(b) Cost plus or fixed fee contracts. These are contracts in which the contractor or
subcontractor agrees to furnish the materials and supplies and necessary services
in exchange for reimbursement of costs plus a fee that is fixed in advance or
calculated as a percentage of the costs.
(c) Upset or guaranteed price contracts. These are contracts in which the
contractor or subcontractor agrees to furnish materials and supplies and necessary
services based on costs plus fees but with an upset or guaranteed maximum price
which may not be exceeded.
(d) Retail sale plus installation contracts. These are contracts for improvements to
real property in which the contractor or subcontractor agrees to sell specifically
described and itemized materials and supplies at an agreed price or at the regular
retail price and to complete the work either for an additional agreed price or on
the basis of time consumed. In order for a contract to fit in this category, all the
materials that will be incorporated into the work must be itemized and priced in
the contract before work begins. If a contract itemizes some materials but does not
itemize other materials that will be incorporated into the work, the contract is not
included in this category. Because the sale of the materials is a separable
transaction from the installation, the purchaser must assume title to and risk of
loss of the materials and supplies as they are delivered, rather than accepting title
only to the completed work. The contractor may remain liable for negligence in
handling and installing the items.
(e) Time and materials contracts. These are contracts in which the contractor or
subcontractor agrees to furnish materials and supplies and necessary services for a
price that will be calculated as the sum of the contractor’s cost or a marked up
cost for materials to be used plus an amount for services to be based on the time
2

See Rule 12A-1.051(2)(h)2.b., F.A.C.

Technical Assistance Advisement

5

spent performing the contract. These contracts are similar to cost plus or fixed fee
contracts, because the final price to the property holder will be determined based
on the cost of performance. A time and materials contract may or may not also
have a guaranteed or upset price clause. Time and materials contracts differ from
contracts described in paragraph (d), because the materials are not completely
identified, itemized, and priced in the contract in advance and because the
property owner is contracting for a finished job rather than the purchase of
materials. (Emphasis added)
Agreements structured as a "retail sales plus installation contracts" are contracts for real property
improvements which require the contractor to collect and remit sales tax from the homeowner on
the materials and supplies portion of the contract. Rule 12A-1.05(3), F.A.C., provides that the
retail sales plus installation contract must state that the homeowner is buying the materials from
the contractor. The contractor is required to register as a dealer, and is thereby able to buy the
materials and supplies tax-free from its supplier.
If the contract does not state that the materials are being sold to the homeowner, then the contract
is generally treated as a lump-sum real property contract. Under a lump-sum contract
arrangement, the contractor is required to pay the sales tax on the materials and supplies when
the contractor buys them from its supplier, and no sales or use tax is charged to the homeowner.
Focusing on the four specific questions raised in your letter requesting the TAA, we offer the•
following guidance based on the facts provided:

  1. Should Taxpayer use a lump sum contract instead of a retail sale plus
    installation contract when contracting with customers where an itemized list
    of materials to be used in the performance of the contract is not provided?
    If the Taxpayer cannot provide an itemized list of materials and supplies at the
    inception of a contract, or the contract does not otherwise qualify as a "retail sale
    plus installment contract," then the contract is usually categorized as a lump-sum
    contract. See Rule 12A-1.051, F.A.C. A lump-sum contract is an agreement
    whereby the contractor will furnish and install the materials and supplies on
    which the contractor will pay sales tax to its vendor.
  2. Should Taxpayer continue to collect sales tax from its customers on the
    charges made to customers for the real property improvements described
    above?
    The Taxpayer should collect and remit sales tax on transactions in which it merely
    sells tangible personal property to its customers, but does not install that property.
    If the Taxpayer enters into a real property contract placing the sales tax obligation
    on the customer, then sales tax would be collected and remitted by the Taxpayer.
    If a contract is structured as a lump-sum real property contract, then sales tax is
    not collected from the homeowner, but instead would be paid by the Taxpayer
    when it buys the materials and supplies.

Technical Assistance Advisement

6

  1. Does Taxpayer owe sales tax on the materials it uses fulfilling the real
    property improvements contracts? (if so, should Rule 12A-1.043, F.A.C.
    apply?)
    The Taxpayer would be the ultimate consumer of materials in real property
    contracts described in Rule 12A-1.051, F.A.C. As such, the obligation to pay sales
    tax under the relative agreements is established. Rule 12A-1.043, F.A.C., applies
    to a Taxpayer who manufactures tangible personal property for its own uses. If
    the Taxpayer does manufacture items for its own use, (i.e. in real property
    contracts), the sales tax obligation is established in either case.
  2. Is Taxpayer required to separately list the applicable amount of sales tax
    due on contracts that are for materials only?
    All Taxpayers are required to comply with Section 212.07(2), F.S. This law
    requires all Taxpayers to separately state sales tax from the price of the good(s)
    sold. The law states:
    A dealer shall, as far as practicable, add the amount of the tax
    imposed under this chapter to the sale price, and the amount of the
    tax shall be separately stated as Florida tax on any charge ticket,
    sales slip, invoice, or other tangible evidence of sale.
    The Taxpayer must comply with Section 212.07(2), F.S., and list the applicability
    amount of sales tax.
    Conclusion
    The statutes and rules discussed therein should provide sufficient guidance to the Taxpayer in
    this matter. A contractor who both sells and installs fixtures (i.e. real property contracts) must
    comply with the requirements of collecting and remitting sales tax from the customer on the sale
    of tangible personal property. Or, the contractor must pay the sales tax upon purchasing or
    manufacturing tangible personal property to be used in real property contracts. The terms of this
    contract govern the tax treatment.
    This response constitutes a Technical Assistance Advisement under section 213.22, F.S., which
    is binding on the Department only under the facts and circumstances described in the request
    for this advice as specified in section 213.22, F.S. Our response is predicated on those facts
    and the specific situation summarized above. You are advised that subsequent statutory or
    administrative rule changes, or judicial interpretations of the statutes or rules, upon which this
    advice is based, may subject similar future transactions to a different treatment than that
    expressed in this response.

Technical Assistance Advisement

7

You are further advised that this response, your request and related backup documents are
public records under Chapter 119, F.S., and are subject to disclosure to the public under the
conditions of section 213.22, F.S. Confidential information must be deleted before public
disclosure. In an effort to protect confidentiality, we request you provide the undersigned
with an edited copy of your request for Technical Assistance Advisement, the backup
material, and this response, deleting names, addresses, and any other details which might lead
to identification of the taxpayer. Your response should be received by the Department within
15 days of the date of this letter.
Sincerely,

Haben Abraha, Esq.
Tax Law Specialist
Technical Assistance & Dispute Resolution
Record ID: 201490
cc:

XXXX
XXXX
XXXX

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 2015 ruling on this question. Ezel checks current Florida tax law and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.