CT Ruling 93-15 Sales and Use Taxes 1993-07-28

Is a company's on-line and archival data storage service a taxable computer and data processing service in Connecticut?

Short answer: Partly. A division of a large out-of-state corporation stored Connecticut customers' data at out-of-state facilities, both on-line (customers access it from their own computers) and archival (data copied onto magnetic tapes or disc packs removed from the system). DRS held the ON-LINE storage IS a taxable 'computer and data processing service' under Conn. Gen. Stat. § 12-407(2)(i)(A) ('storing and filing of information'), and so are 'downloading' data to archival storage and 'uploading' it back to on-line ('retrieving or providing access to information'). But OFF-LINE archival storage -- where the tapes or discs are detached from the computer system -- is NOT taxable: what's being stored is the tangible medium, and storage of tangible personal property isn't in the § 12-407(2) definition of 'sale.' On collection: even though the Division itself had no physical presence in Connecticut, DRS looks to the whole CORPORATION, which did have a physical presence here, giving enough nexus to require the corporation to collect and remit the tax. DRS also REVOKED a January 15, 1976 ruling that had told the Division its storage services were not taxable, effective for sales on and after this ruling.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1993. Ezel answers yours, under current Connecticut tax law, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1993
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is an official Ruling of the Connecticut Department of Revenue Services (DRS), typically issued to a specific taxpayer in response to that taxpayer's request and based on the specific facts presented and the Connecticut tax law in effect when it was issued. DRS states this Ruling is cited in Ruling 95-2, and it revoked a January 15, 1976 ruling issued to the same taxpayer. The rate applicable to computer and data processing services has changed over time, so confirm the current rate. The physical-presence nexus standard the Ruling relied on (National Bellas Hess / Quill) has since been superseded, physical presence is no longer required to create a remote seller's sales-and-use-tax collection duty, so the nexus discussion here is historical; confirm current nexus law. DRS may later declare a Ruling obsolete or supersede it, so a taxpayer with different facts should not assume it still applies. Taxpayer-identifying details are redacted. Connecticut imposes its sales and use tax solely at the state level, there are no local or municipal sales taxes. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice. Consult a licensed Connecticut tax professional about your specific situation.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A division of a large out-of-state corporation stored Connecticut customers' data at facilities outside Connecticut. Storage came in two forms:

  • On-line storage — data kept live so customers could reach it directly from their own office computers, billed by the amount stored each day.
  • Archival storage — data copied onto magnetic tapes or disc packs that are then removed from the computer system, retrievable overnight on request, with a flat charge per file to move data in or out and a separate charge for the amount archived.

The Division had a 1976 ruling saying its storage services weren't taxable, and it still relied on it. DRS revisited the question and split the answer.

Taxable (on-line and the transfers): On-line storage is a computer and data processing service under Conn. Gen. Stat. § 12-407(2)(i)(A), because the regulation (Conn. Agencies Regs. § 12-426-27(b)(1)) covers "storing and filing of information" and "retrieving or providing access to information." So:

  • On-line storage charges are taxable (storing and filing).
  • "Downloading" data from on-line to archival storage is taxable (storing and filing).
  • "Uploading" data from archival back to on-line is taxable (retrieving/providing access).

Not taxable (off-line archival): Once the tapes or disc packs are detached from the computer system, what's being stored is just the tangible medium — the physical tapes/discs. Storage of tangible personal property is not in the § 12-407(2) definition of "sale" and "selling," so charges for maintaining data in off-line archival storage are not taxable.

Who must collect it — a nexus twist: The Division itself did not appear to have a physical presence in Connecticut. But for deciding who is a "retailer," DRS looks past the divisional structure to the whole corporation — and the corporation did maintain a physical presence in Connecticut. That gave enough nexus (under National Bellas Hess, and citing National Geographic Society) to require the corporation to collect and remit Connecticut sales and use taxes on the Division's Connecticut customers.

Finally, DRS revoked the January 15, 1976 ruling to the Division, effective for sales on and after the date of this ruling — so the taxpayer could no longer rely on the old no-tax answer going forward.

What this means for you

Data storage, hosting, and IT service providers

Live, accessible storage of customer data — and the operations of moving data in and out of it — is generally a taxable computer and data processing service in Connecticut. If your service keeps data on-line for customers to reach, expect it to be taxable.

On-line vs. off-line is the dividing line

The tax turns on whether the computer system is actively involved. On-line storage and up/downloads = taxable service. Passive storage of detached tapes/discs = storage of tangible property, not taxable. How you structure and bill (and document) each piece matters.

A corporation can't escape nexus through a division

DRS looks to the whole corporation, not just the division doing the selling. If your corporation has a physical presence in Connecticut, a division serving Connecticut customers can create a duty to collect — even if that division has no in-state presence of its own. (Note: the physical-presence nexus standard here has since been superseded; economic-nexus rules now also apply — confirm current law.)

Old rulings can be revoked

The Division's favorable 1976 ruling was revoked prospectively. A ruling protects you only until DRS changes it; watch for revocations and don't rely indefinitely on an old answer.

Common questions

Q: Is online data storage taxable in Connecticut?
A: Under this ruling, yes — on-line storage is a taxable computer and data processing service, as are the charges to download data to archival storage and upload it back.

Q: Is archival storage of tapes or discs taxable?
A: No. Once the tapes or disc packs are detached from the computer system, you're storing tangible personal property, which isn't a taxable "sale" under § 12-407(2).

Q: The service is provided from outside Connecticut — is it still taxable?
A: Yes, for Connecticut customers. Computer services are taxable where delivered or intended for use, so services used by Connecticut customers are taxable.

Q: The division has no Connecticut presence — who collects the tax?
A: The corporation. DRS looks beyond the divisional structure; because the whole corporation had a physical presence in Connecticut, it had nexus and had to collect and remit. (That physical-presence standard has since been superseded — confirm current nexus rules.)

Citations and references

Statutes, regulations, and case law:

  • Conn. Gen. Stat. § 12-407(2)(i)(A) (computer and data processing services); § 12-407(2) ("sale"/"selling")
  • Conn. Agencies Regs. § 12-426-27(b)(1); § 12-426-27(d)
  • Conn. Gen. Stat. §§ 12-411(3), (8); § 12-407(15)(c) ("engaged in business")
  • Texaco Refining & Marketing Co. v. Commissioner of Revenue Services, 202 Conn. 583, 600, 522 A.2d 771 (1987)
  • National Bellas Hess, Inc. v. Department of Revenue of Illinois, 386 U.S. 753 (1967); Cally Curtis Company v. Groppo, 214 Conn. 292, 572 A.2d 302 (1990); SFA Folio Collections, Inc. v. Bannon, 217 Conn. 220, 585 A.2d 666 (1991); Quill Corporation v. North Dakota, 504 U.S. ___, 119 L.Ed.2d 91 (1992); National Geographic Society v. California Board of Equalization, 430 U.S. 551 (1977)

Related guidance (described in prose, not linked):

  • The Division's prior ruling of January 15, 1976 (revoked prospectively by this Ruling)
  • Ruling 95-2 (cites this Ruling)

Source

Original ruling text

Ruling 93-15, Sales and Use Taxes / Computer and Data Processing Services

This Ruling is cited in Ruling 95-2

FACTS:

A division ("the Division") of a large out-of-state corporation ("the Corporation") provides data storage services to Connecticut customers at facilities outside Connecticut. Such storage can be either on-line, so that the customers may access the stored data through their office computers, or archival, in which the data has been transferred onto magnetic tapes or disc packs which are then removed from the computer system. Upon a customer's request, data may be retrieved from archival storage on an overnight basis. The customers decide how much data is to be stored and whether it is to be in on-line or archival form.

On-line storage is billed to each customer according to the amount of data being stored each day. Customers may request archival storage of specified data files from their office computers. The Division duplicates the specified files onto magnetic tapes or disc packs and stores such tapes outside the on-line system. Data stored in archival form may be retrieved overnight upon a customer's request. A flat charge per file is made each time files are transferred to or retrieved from archival storage, and a separate charge is made for storing archived data based on the amount of such data stored each day.

In 1976, a ruling was issued to the Division which stated that its data storage services were not taxable. The Division continues to rely on the 1976 ruling.

ISSUES:

Whether the service of providing either on-line or archival storage of data is a computer and data processing service under Conn. Gen. Stat. § 12-407(2)(i)(A).

Whether the Division must collect and remit Connecticut sales and use taxes from Connecticut customers on the data storage services provided by the Division to such customers.

DISCUSSION:

Conn. Gen. Stat. § 12-407(2)(i)(A) includes in the definition of "sale" and "selling" the rendering of computer and data processing services. Conn. Agencies Regs. § 12-426-27(b)(1) defines such services as including, among others, "providing computer time, storing and filing of information, [and] retrieving or providing access to information." The Connecticut Supreme Court has stated that "legislative ratification of a ... regulation supports the position that the regulation is consistent with the general statutory scheme that the regulation was designed to implement." Texaco Refining & Marketing Co. v. Commissioner of Revenue Services , 202 Conn. 583, 600, 522 A.2d 771 (1987).

Charges made for "downloading" data from on-line storage to archival storage, as well as charges for the on-line storage of data permitting the direct and immediate access to stored data from the customers' own computers, are taxable as gross receipts from "the storing and filing of information" within the meaning of "computer and data processing services" in Conn. Agencies Regs. § 12-426-27(b)(1). In addition, charges made for "uploading" data from archival storage to on-line storage are taxable as gross receipts from computer and data processing services as "retrieving or providing access to information."

On the other hand, the off-line storage of data in archival form, where the magnetic tapes or disc packs onto which data has been transferred have been detached from the computer system, does not constitute ongoing computer and data processing services. Instead, what is being stored is the tangible medium, the tapes or discs, onto which data has been recorded. The storage of tangible personal property is not included in the definition of "sale" and "selling" in Conn. Gen. Stat. § 12-407(2) and therefore is not taxable.

An out-of-state service provider engaged in business in this state is required to register to collect and remit use tax to Connecticut on behalf of its customers who use services in Connecticut. Conn. Gen. Stat. § § 12-411(3) and (8). "Engaged in business" is defined in Conn. Gen. Stat. § 12-407(15)(c) to include "rendering in this state any service described in any of the subdivisions of [§ 12-407(2)] ...." In Connecticut, computer and data processing services are deemed taxable at the location where they are delivered or intended for use. See Conn. Agencies Regs. § 12-426-27(d). "Such reports are taxable, whether given in written, oral or any other form, if delivered to or intended for use in the State of Connecticut." Therefore, with respect to any of the Division's customers who are located in Connecticut, the Division is "engaged in business" here, as that term is used in the Sales and Use Taxes Act. However, another prerequisite of nexus is the physical presence of a retailer in the taxing state, such as through the ownership of tangible personal property or the presence of representatives, solicitors, retail outlets or offices. See National Bellas Hess, Inc. v. Department of Revenue of Illinois , 386 U.S. 753, 18 L. Ed. 2d 505 (1967). This physical presence "nexus" requirement has been acknowledged and adhered to by the Supreme Court of this state in Cally Curtis Company v. Groppo , 214 Conn. 292, 572 A.2d 302 (1990) and SFA Folio Collections, Inc. v. Bannon , 217 Conn. 220, 585 A.2d 666 (1991), and recently affirmed by the United States Supreme Court in Quill Corporation v. North Dakota , 504 U.S. , 119 L.Ed.2d 91 (1992).

The Division itself does not appear to maintain such a physical presence in this state in connection with its data storage services. However, for purposes of determining who is a "retailer" for sales and use tax purposes, the Department looks beyond the divisional organization of a corporation to the corporation itself. Because the Corporation to which the Division belongs does maintain a physical presence in this state, there is sufficient nexus with Connecticut under National Bellas Hess for the Corporation to be responsible for collecting and remitting sales and use taxes from its Division's Connecticut customers. See also National Geographic Society v. California Board of Equalization , 430 U.S. 551, 560, 51 L. Ed. 2d 631, 639-40 (1977).

RULING:

The on-line data storage services provided by the Division are taxable as computer and data processing services under Conn. Gen. Stat. § 12-407(2)(i)(A), as are the services of "downloading" data from on-line storage to archival storage and "uploading" data from archival storage to on-line storage. Charges for maintaining data in archival storage are not included in the definition of "sale" and "selling" in Conn. Gen. Stat. § 12-407(2) and are not subject to sales and use taxes.

Because of the services rendered to Connecticut customers, and the physical presence of the Corporation in Connecticut, the Division has contacts with Connecticut that are sufficient under National Bellas Hess, supra , to require the Corporation to collect sales and use taxes from the Division's Connecticut customers.

The ruling issued to the Division on January 15, 1976 is revoked and may not be relied upon for sales occurring on and after the date of issuance of this ruling.

LEGAL DIVISION

Issued: July 28, 1993

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 1993 ruling on this question. Ezel checks current Connecticut tax law and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.