Did Connecticut Ruling 89-73 exempt electricity for common-area lighting in predominantly residential apartment buildings?
Apply this to your situation
This page answers the general question as of 1989. Ezel answers yours, under current Connecticut tax law, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Electricity sold to an apartment building was exempt when the building was predominantly rented for residential dwelling purposes. The exemption included the building's electric bill for interior hallway lights and exterior lighting.
The official page says the information is not current and PS 94(3) obsoleted the ruling.
What this means for you
The historical ruling extended the residential classification to specified common-area lighting at a predominantly residential apartment building. Because it is obsolete, current utility bills require current guidance.
Common questions
Did the exemption cover hallway lighting? Yes, when the building was predominantly residential.
Did it cover exterior lighting? Yes under the same condition.
Citations and references
- PS 94(3), identified by the official page as obsoleting this ruling.
Source
- Landing page: Connecticut DRS Rulings
- Ruling: Ruling 89-73
Original ruling text
Ruling 89-73, Utility Exemption - Residential
This information is not current and is being provided for reference purposes only
This Ruling has been obsoleted by PS 94(3)
The sales of electricity to apartment buildings that are predominately rented for residential dwelling purposes are exempt from sales and use tax. If the apartment building is predominately rented for residential dwelling purposes, then the electric bill for inside hallway lights and exterior lighting is not subject to sales and use tax.
LEGAL DIVISION
September 6, 1989
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read a 1989 ruling on this question. Ezel checks current Connecticut tax law and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.