Did a hot-water heat exchanger used for handwashing qualify as machinery used directly in agricultural production under Connecticut Ruling 89-24?
Apply this to your situation
This page answers the general question as of 1989. Ezel answers yours, under current Connecticut tax law, with citations.
Plain-English summary
The hot-water heat exchanger did not qualify as machinery used directly in agricultural production when it heated water for handwashing.
The Department did not say the heat exchanger was not machinery. It said this use was indirect or outside the production process because handwashing occurred before the first operation in producing farm products for sale.
The ruling contrasted machinery used exclusively to heat water for sterilizing milk containers, which it gave as an example of direct production use.
The official archive says this ruling was obsoleted by Announcement 94(5).
What this means for you
The historical ruling focused on where the equipment's use fell in the production sequence, not merely whether the equipment was installed at a farm. Its obsolete status means current direct-use tests must be checked separately.
Common questions
Was the heat exchanger considered machinery? The ruling did not deny that it was machinery.
Why did the exemption fail? Its handwashing use was before the first agricultural production operation.
What use did the ruling contrast as direct? Heating water exclusively to sterilize milk containers.
Citations and references
- Conn. Gen. Stat. § 12-412(34), as cited in the ruling.
Source
- Landing page: Connecticut DRS Rulings
- Ruling: Ruling 89-24
Original ruling text
Ruling 89-24, Machinery
This Ruling has been obsoleted by AN 94(5)
From the information supplied in your letter, it does not appear that the hot water heat exchanger is machinery used directly in an agricultural production process, as the phrase is used in Conn. Gen. Stat. §12-412(34). This is not to say that the heat exchanger is not machinery. This is to say that machinery used to heat water for handwashing is--unlike, e.g., machinery used exclusively to heat water to sterilize milk containers--either indirectly used in an agricultural production process or is not used in an agricultural production process at all, because it is used in an activity that is prior to the first operation in the production of farm products for sale.
LEGAL DIVISION
July 10, 1989
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read a 1989 ruling on this question. Ezel checks current Connecticut tax law and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.