When may a Colorado renewable-energy project claim an enterprise zone investment credit, and does selling most of the project LLC disqualify it?

Short answer The credit belongs to the tax year qualified property is placed in service. Selling 77.5% interests in the project LLCs shortly afterward did not, by itself, disqualify the requesting company, but the projects had to remain used solely within the enterprise zone for the following 12 months.
State
CO
Ruling
PLR 20-003
Tax type
Corporate Income Tax
Issued
2020-05-06
Issued by
Colorado Department of Revenue, Office of Tax Policy Analysis
Requested by
A corporation planning two Colorado renewable-energy projects (identity redacted by the Department)

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 2020. Ask about yours and see what current Colorado tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 2020
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is an official Colorado Department of Revenue private letter ruling. It binds the Department only for the requesting taxpayer and stated facts; no other taxpayer may rely on it. The ruling may be modified or revoked. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The Colorado Department of Revenue said the enterprise zone investment tax credit for the proposed renewable-energy projects would be allowed in the tax year when qualified property was placed in service.

The company planned to build two projects through initially disregarded project LLCs and then sell roughly 77.5% of each LLC to passive investors after the projects entered service. The Department said that sale alone did not disqualify the company from claiming the credit. It would keep a partial interest, manage the LLCs, and bear project risk.

The projects still had to be used solely and exclusively in an enterprise zone for at least one year. If property was used outside the zone during the 12 months after entering service, the credit would be unavailable; a previously claimed credit would have to be forfeited through an amended return.

What this means for you

Renewable-energy developers

Under this ruling's facts, the credit timing followed the qualified property's placed-in-service year, rather than the later passive-investor transaction. The Department's conclusion depended on continued enterprise-zone use and the company's remaining management and risk.

Accountants and tax professionals

Track each project's placed-in-service date and use for the next 12 months. An equity sale was not automatically disqualifying here, but moving property outside the zone in that period would require forfeiting a claimed credit. The ruling analyzes the law and projects described in May 2020; check current credit requirements.

Common questions

Q: Could the company claim the credit before putting the projects in service? A: No. The Department assigned the credit to the tax year qualified property was placed in service.

Q: Did selling 77.5% of each project LLC cancel the credit?
A: No, not by itself under the stated facts. The company retained partial ownership and management, while the zone-use condition still applied.

Q: What if a project left the enterprise zone within a year?
A: It would not qualify for the credit. If the company had already claimed it, the ruling required an amended return to forfeit and repay it.

Citations and references

  • § 39-30-104(1)(a) and (2.8), C.R.S. (enterprise zone investment and renewable-energy project provisions).
  • 1 CCR 201-13, Rule 39-30-104(1)(c) (enterprise-zone use and forfeiture).
  • 26 CFR § 1.46-3(d) (placed-in-service criteria cited by the ruling).
  • 1 CCR 201-1, Rule 24-35-103.5 (private letter ruling procedure).

Source

Original ruling text

Office of Tax Policy Analysis
P.O. Box 17087
Denver, CO 80217-0087 [email protected]

PLR 20-003

May 6, 2020

XXXXXX
Attn: XXXXXX
XXXXXX
XXXXXX

Re: Enterprise Zone Investment Tax Credits

Dear XXXXXX,

You submitted a request for a private letter ruling on behalf of XXXXXX (“Company”) to the Colorado Department of Revenue (“Department”) pursuant to 1 CCR 201-1, Rule 24-35-103.5. This letter is the Department’s private letter ruling. This ruling is binding on the Department to the extent set forth in 1 CCR 201- 1, Rule 24-35-103.5. It cannot be relied upon by any taxpayer other than the taxpayer to whom the ruling is made.
Issue(s)

1. In which tax year is the enterprise zone investment tax credit allowed for qualified investments?

2. Does the sale of 77.5 percent equity interests in Project LLCs to Passive Investors within one year of the dates the Projects are placed in service disqualify Company from claiming enterprise zone investment tax credits for the Projects?

Conclusion(s)

1. The enterprise zone investment tax credit is allowed for the taxable year in which the qualified property is placed in service.

2. Company’s sale of 77.5 percent equity interests in Project LLCs to Passive Investors does not, by itself, disqualify the Company from claiming enterprise zone investment tax credits for the Projects.

Background

Company has provided the following statement of facts:

Company is a C corporation that plans to build and operate two projects ("Projects") in Colorado that will be considered renewable energy investments pursuant to section 39-30-104(2.8), C.R.S. To facilitate the construction of the Projects, Company has created two limited liability companies ("Project LLCs"). Project LLCs will build the Projects and place them into service. Project LLCs will initially be single member limited liability companies disregarded for federal and Colorado income tax purposes.


Page 2

PLR 20-003
May 6, 2020
Page 2

Company has filed pre-certification forms with the applicable county enterprise zone administrators that the Projects are located within enterprise zones and are eligible for renewable energy investment tax credits. When the Projects are completed and placed into service, Company will file certification applications with the enterprise zone administrators for approval permitting Company to claim the tax credits on its corporate Colorado income tax return.

Shortly after each Project is placed into service, the Company will enter into an agreement with a passive investor ("Passive Investor") pursuant to which the Passive Investor will purchase an approximate 77.5 percent equity interest in each Project LLC. For federal and Colorado income tax purposes, each Project LLC will become a partnership upon the sale of the equity interest to the Passive Investor with Company retaining an approximate 22.5 percent equity interest in each Project LLC.

Company will continue to manage Project LLCs after they become partnerships. In addition to maintaining responsibility for the Project LLCs and Projects, Company will also bear the risk of loss for the Projects.
1
Discussion

The enterprise zone investment tax credit is equal to a percentage of a taxpayer’s total qualified 2 investment, as determined under section 46(c) of the Internal Revenue Code, in the taxable year. Section 46(c) of the Internal Revenue Code provides that the “qualified investment” is the applicable percentage of either the basis in new qualified property or the cost of used qualified property, as 3 applicable, placed in service by the taxpayer during the taxable year. Consequently, the enterprise zone investment tax credit is allowed for the taxable year in which the qualified property is placed in service.

However, the qualified property must be “used solely and exclusively in an enterprise zone for at least 4 one year.” If the qualified property is used outside of the enterprise zone during the twelve-month period immediately following the date the property was first placed in service, the enterprise zone investment tax 5 credit will not be allowed with respect to such property. If an income tax return has been filed claiming the credit for any property that is used outside of the enterprise zone during the twelve-month period immediately following the date the property was first placed in service, an amended return must be filed 6 forfeiting such credit.

Company will retain partial ownership of the Projects and exercise control over the Projects after selling an equity interest in Project LLCs to Passive Investors. Consequently, Company will be sufficiently equipped to either ensure use of the Projects solely and exclusively within the enterprise zone for at least one year or, if used outside of the enterprise zone, to file original or amended returns, as necessary, to forfeit any credit claimed for the Projects. Therefore, Company’s sale of 77.5 percent equity interest in the

1
All references in this letter to sections of the Internal Revenue Code are to such sections as they existed immediately prior to the enactment of the federal "Revenue Reconciliation Act of 1990". 2
§ 39-30-104(1)(a), C.R.S.
3
See 26 CFR § 1.46-3(d) for criteria used in determining the taxable year in which qualified property is considered to be placed in service. 4
§ 39-30-104(1)(a), C.R.S.
5
1 CCR 201-13, Rule 39-30-104(1)(c).
6
1 CCR 201-13, Rule 39-30-104(1)(c).


Page 3

PLR 20-003
May 6, 2020
Page 3

Projects to Passive Investors does not, by itself, disqualify Company from claiming enterprise zone investment tax credits for the Projects. Although, if Projects are used outside of the enterprise zone at any time during the twelve months immediately following the date they are placed into service, they will not qualify for the credit and Company will be required to file amended tax returns to forfeit and repay the full amount of any credit claimed for the Projects on any previously filed returns.

Miscellaneous

This ruling is premised on the assumption that Company has completely and accurately disclosed all material facts and that all representations are true and complete. The Department reserves the right, among others, to independently evaluate Company’s representations and assumptions. The ruling is null and void if any such assumption and representation is incorrect and has a material bearing on the conclusions reached in this ruling and is subject to modification or revocation in accordance to 1 CCR 201-1, Rule 24-35-103.5.

This ruling is binding on the Department to the extent set forth in 1 CCR 201-1, Rule 24-35-103.5. It cannot be relied upon by any taxpayer other than the taxpayer to whom the ruling is made.

Sincerely,

Office of Tax Policy Analysis
Colorado Department of Revenue

This ruling cannot be relied upon by any other taxpayer other than the taxpayer to whom the ruling is made.

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 2020. Ezel checks current Colorado tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace