How does Colorado source guaranteed payments for services paid to nonresident partners?

Short answer The Department's nonbinding guidance sources a service-related guaranteed payment like wages: work performed in Colorado produces Colorado-source income. A partnership's election for sourcing distributive shares does not change that rule.
State
CO
Ruling
GIL 20-001
Tax type
Individual Income Tax
Issued
2020-02-28
Issued by
Colorado Department of Revenue, Office of Tax Policy Analysis
Requested by
A requester asking about payments to nonresident partners (identity redacted by the Department)

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 2020. Ask about yours and see what current Colorado tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 2020
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is an official Colorado Department of Revenue general information letter. It is a general discussion, makes no specific determination for the requester, and is not binding on the Department. Check current law and facts before acting. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Colorado's Department of Revenue explained that a guaranteed payment for services to a nonresident partner is sourced like wages: payment for work performed in Colorado is Colorado-source income.

A guaranteed payment is not the partner's distributive share of partnership income for this purpose. Therefore, a partnership's election about how to apportion or allocate a nonresident partner's distributive share does not change the sourcing method for the service payment.

This is a general information letter. The Department says it gives a general discussion, makes no specific determination for the requester, and is not bound by it.

What this means for you

Partnerships and nonresident partners

Separate guaranteed payments for services from distributive shares when assessing Colorado-source income. The Department applied the place-of-work rule to the former, even if the partnership elected a different method for the latter.

Accountants and tax professionals

The letter relies on the distinction in I.R.C. § 707(c) and Colorado's rule for sourcing service-related guaranteed payments. It does not decide the specific work locations or tax amount for a named partner.

Common questions

Q: Are guaranteed payments for Colorado work Colorado-source income? A: Yes, under the Department's stated rule for service payments.

Q: Does the partnership's distributive-share apportionment election control these payments? A: No. The letter says that election applies to distributive shares, not guaranteed payments for services.

Q: Is this guidance binding on the Department?
A: No. It is a general information letter, and the Department expressly says it is not bound by it.

Citations and references

  • § 39-22-109(2)(a)(II) and (III), C.R.S. (Colorado-source income).
  • § 39-22-203(1)(a), C.R.S. (nonresident partnership distributive shares).
  • Rule 39-22-109(3)(b)(xii) and Rule 39-22-109(2)(b)(i) (service guaranteed-payment and wage sourcing, as cited in the letter).
  • I.R.C. § 707(c) (guaranteed payments).

Source

Original ruling text

Physical Address: Mailing Address:
Office of Tax Policy Analysis Office of Tax Policy Analysis, Room 607 1375 Sherman Street, Room 607 P.O. Box 17087
Denver, CO 80203
Denver, CO 80217-0087

GIL-20-001

February 28, 2020

XXXXXXXXXX
Attn: XXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXX

Re: Sourcing of partnership guaranteed payments

Dear XXXXXXXXXX,

You submitted a request for guidance regarding the sourcing of guaranteed payments paid to a nonresident partner for the purpose of Colorado income tax.

The Colorado Department of Revenue (“Department”) issues general information letters and private letter rulings. A general information letter provides a general overview of the relevant tax issues, but is not binding on the Department. A private letter ruling provides a specific determination for a specific set of facts, is binding on the Department but not on the taxpayer, and requires payment of a fee. For more information about general information letters and private letter rulings, please see 1 CCR 201-1, Rule 24-35-103.5.

The Department treats your inquiry as a request for a general information letter. It is important to remember that general information letters, such as this one, are general discussions of tax law and are not binding on the Department. If you would like the Department to issue a private letter ruling on the issue raised here, you may submit a request and pay the fee in compliance with 1 CCR 201-1, Rule 24-35-103.5.

Issue(s)

1. Is the source of guaranteed payments made by a partnership to nonresident partners for services performed determined pursuant to Rule 39-22-109(3)(b)(xii) for Colorado income tax purposes?
2. Does a partnership’s election to apportion and allocate nonresident partners’ distributive shares pursuant to sections 39-22-303.6 and -303.7, C.R.S., impact the method for determining the source of guaranteed payments?

Discussion

Rule 39-22-109(3)(b)(xii) states that the source of a guaranteed payment1 for services is determined in accordance with the rules for sourcing wage income. Wage income is Colorado-

1
Guaranteed payments are described in section 707(c) of the Internal Revenue Code.


Page 2

GIL-20-001
Page 2

source income if it is paid for work performed in Colorado.2 These rules are promulgated to clarify the application of section 39-22-109(2)(a)(II), C.R.S., pursuant to which any income attributable to a business, trade, or occupation carried on in Colorado is considered to be derived from sources within Colorado.

The separate provision in sections 39-22-109(2)(a)(III) and -203, C.R.S., prescribing the sourcing of distributive shares of partnership income do not apply to guaranteed payments for services rendered because guaranteed payments are not considered part of the partner’s distributive share. The term “distributive share” is not expressly defined in Colorado income tax sections in which it appears and therefore has the same meaning as when used in a comparable context in the Internal Revenue Code.3 Section 707(c) of the Internal Revenue Code states that, for the purpose of section 61, defining gross income, guaranteed payments for services rendered are not considered to be part of a partner’s distributive share.4

A partnership election made pursuant to section 39-22-203(1)(a), C.R.S., in determining the source of a nonresident partner’s distributive share does not impact the method for determining the source of a guaranteed payment for services. Section 39-22-203(1)(a), C.R.S., applies only to a nonresident partner’s distributive share.5 For the reasons provided above, a guaranteed payment is not considered part of a partner’s distributive share for Colorado income tax purposes.

Miscellaneous

This letter represents the good faith opinion of Department personnel who are knowledgeable on state taxes issues. However, the Department does not make a specific determination on any of the issues raised and the Department is not bound by this general information letter.

The Department administers state and state-administered local sales and use taxes. This letter does not address sales and use taxes administered by self-collected home-rule cities and home-rule counties. You may wish to consult with those local governments that administer their own sales or use taxes about the applicability of those taxes. Visit our website at www.colorado.gov/tax for more information about state and local sales taxes.

Sincerely,

Office of Tax Policy Analysis
Colorado Department of Revenue

2
Rule 39-22-109(2)(b)(i).
3
Section 39-22-103(11), C.R.S.
4
See S. Rep. No. 1622, 83d Cong., 2d Sess. 387 (1954): “Subsection (c) provides a rule with respect to guaranteed payments to members of a partnership. A partner who renders services to a partnership for a fixed salary, payable without regard to partnership income, shall be treated, to the extent of such amount, as one who is not a partner.…The amount of such payment shall be included in the partner’s gross income, and shall not be considered a distributive share of partnership income or gain.” See also H.R. Rep. No. 1337, 83d Cong., 2d Sess. 227 (1954). 5 See, section 39-22-203(1)(a), C.R.S. (“In determining Colorado nonresident federal taxable income of a nonresident partner ... only the portion of such partner's distributive share ... in accordance with [either section 39-22-109, C.R.S., or, at the partnership’s election, Colorado corporate apportionment rules].”) (emphasis added).

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 2020. Ezel checks current Colorado tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace