Are inbound freight-in charges taxable when a distributor buys goods for resale?

Short answer Yes. Colorado GIL 11-007 says freight-in charges incurred to move goods from the producer or manufacturer to the seller are not exempt transportation charges and are subject to Colorado sales or use tax. Separately stated post-sale transportation can be treated differently when it is separable from the sale and the buyer has a realistic alternative.
State
CO
Ruling
GIL 11-007
Tax type
Sales & Use Tax
Issued
2011-05-05
Issued by
Colorado Department of Revenue, Office of Tax Policy
Requested by
An industrial parts distributor

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 2011. Ask about yours and see what current Colorado tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 2011
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is an official Colorado Department of Revenue General Information Letter. It provides a general overview of tax issues and is not binding on the Department. It does not address sales or use taxes administered by self-collected home-rule cities or counties. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Colorado’s Department of Revenue distinguished inbound freight-in charges from transportation charges connected with delivery to a customer. The letter concerns a distributor that bought tangible personal property from suppliers, paid common-carrier charges to move it to company locations or customers, and separately stated inbound and outbound freight on invoices.

The Department said transportation charges are generally presumed separable and not taxable when they occur after the property is offered for sale and are stated separately, with an option to use alternative transportation. Freight-in charges are different: charges incurred to move property from the producer or manufacturer to the seller, the seller’s agent, or another person acting for the seller are deemed freight-in charges and are not an exempt transportation charge. The distributor’s inbound freight-in charges were therefore subject to Colorado sales or use tax.

What this means for you

Distributors and retailers

Separate line-item treatment does not by itself make inbound freight exempt. Freight incurred before the sale to move goods to the seller or its representative remains freight-in under the Department’s rule.

Sellers charging delivery

A customer delivery charge may be treated differently when it is performed after the property is offered for sale, the purchaser can choose another transportation method, and the charge is separately stated in a written invoice or contract. The charge cannot materially exceed the seller’s transportation cost.

Accountants and tax professionals

Classify the transportation by its place in the transaction and by who controls the service. The letter applies the Department’s Special Regulation 18 and describes a presumption for separable transportation services.

Common questions

Q: Does separately stating freight-in make it exempt? A: No. The Department says freight-in charges are not an exempt transportation charge even though the company separately states them.

Q: What is freight-in?
A: It is transportation incurred to move tangible personal property from the place of production or the manufacturer to the seller, the seller’s agent or representative, or another person acting for the seller.

Q: Can outbound delivery be nontaxable?
A: It may be, if it is separable from the sale, stated separately in a written document, and the purchaser has an alternative such as pickup or another carrier. The letter’s result for freight-in does not automatically decide every outbound charge.

Q: Is this a binding ruling?
A: No. It is a General Information Letter and is not binding on the Department.

Citations and references

  • §§ 39-26-104(1)(a) and 202, C.R.S. (sales and use tax on tangible personal property)
  • Special Regulation 18 (transportation services and freight-in charges)
  • A.D. Stores v. Department of Revenue, 19 P.3d 680 (Colo. 2001) (post-sale services and transportation charges)

Source

Original ruling text

Office of Tax Policy
P.O. Box 17087
Denver, CO 80217-0087
[email protected]

GIL-11-007
May 5, 2011
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
ATTN:
XXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Re: Taxability of Intermediate or Freight-in Charges.
Dear XXXXXXXXXXX
You submitted on behalf of XXXXXXXXXX (“Company”) a request for guidance on the application of sales tax on “freight-in” charges. We apologize for the delay in preparing this response. The department issues general information letters and private letter rulings. A general information letter provides a general overview of the relevant tax issues and is not binding on the department. A private letter ruling provides a specific determination for a specific set of facts, is binding on the department but not the taxpayer, and requires payment of a fee. For more information about general information letters and private letter rulings, please see Department regulation 24-35-103.5 at www.taxcolorado.org > FYI/Publication > Rulings. The department initially treats your request as one of a general information letter. If you would like the department to issue a private letter ruling on the issues you raise, you can resubmit a request and fee in compliance with regulation 24-35-103.5. It is important to remember that general information letters, such as this one, are general discussions of tax law and are not a determination of the tax consequence of any particular action or inaction. Issue Are freight-in charges, also referred to as inbound freight charges, subject to Colorado sales or use tax? Background Company is an industrial parts distributor with many locations throughout the United States. The tangible personal property that Company purchases from suppliers is resold through Company’s regional distribution centers, shops and sales branches. Company must pay

freight-in charges to suppliers so the tangible personal property can be shipped by a common carrier to Company branches or customers. In addition, Company pays outbound freight charges to deliver the tangible personal property to customers. On invoices, Company separately states both freight-in charges and outbound freight charges. The question at issue is whether Company is required to pay tax on the freight-in charges, which are made prior to the sale and title transfer of the goods in question. Discussion Colorado levies sales and use tax on the sale, use, consumption or storage of tangible personal property. §§39-26-104(1)(a) and 202, C.R.S. The purchase price paid by customers, on which sales tax is computed, includes all costs incurred by the retailer in making a sale. Services that occur after the sale are generally not taxable. A.D Stores v Department of Revenue, 19 P3d 680 (Colo. 2001). Transportation charges related to the purchase of tangible personal property are generally not taxable, unless they are both inseparable from the sale, or not stated separately on invoices for taxable goods, or are freight-in charges. The department presumes transportation services are separable from the sale of goods, regardless of whether title to the goods has passed from the buyer to seller at the time the transportation service is rendered. If a purchaser has no realistic option but to use the transportation services of the seller, then the transportation charge is not separable and is taxable. The department promulgated Special Regulation 18 (Transportation Services) which sets forth the following rules governing the taxability of transportation charges:

  1. The transportation of tangible personal property between a retailer and purchaser is a
    service presumed to be not subject to sales or use tax. Transportation charges are not taxable if they are both (1) separable from the sales transaction, and (2) stated separately on a written invoice or contract. a. “Transportation charges” include carrying, handling, delivery, mileage, freight, postage, shipping, trip charges, stand-by, and other similar charges or fees. b. Separable charges. Transportation charges are separable from the sales transaction if they are performed after the taxable property or service is offered for sale and the seller allows the purchaser the option either to use the seller’s transportation services or use alternative transportation services (including but not limited to the purchaser picking up the property at the seller’s location). The fact that transportation charges are stated separately does not, in and of itself, mean the charges are a separable charge. c. Stated Separately. Transportation charges will be regarded as “separately stated” only if they are set forth separately in a written sales contract, retailer's invoice, or other written document issued in connection with the sale. d. Intermediate or “Freight in” charges. Transportation charges incurred in connection with transporting tangible personal property from the place of production or the manufacturer to the seller or to the seller's agent or representative, or to anyone else acting in the seller's behalf, either directly or through a chain of wholesalers or jobbers or other middlemen, are deemed “freight 2

-in” charges and are not a transportation charge exempt from tax. (emphasis added) e. Overstated Transportation Charges. The amount of transportation charges excluded from the calculation of tax shall not materially exceed the seller’s costs of the transportation. The transportation charges rendered to suppliers for the shipment of tangible personal property by a common carrier to Company branches fall under the category of freight-in charges. Subject to the regulations put forth by the department, these freight-in charges are subject to Colorado sale or use tax. Miscellaneous Pursuant to state law and department regulation 24-35-103.5, noted above, the Department will make public a redacted version of this letter. Your letter requesting this general information letter is not made public. I enclose a proposed redacted version of this letter. Please contact me within 60 days from the date of this letter if you have any questions, comments, or objection concerning the redacted letter. I hope this is helpful. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. Sincerely,

Office of Tax Policy
Colorado Department of Revenue

3

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 2011. Ezel checks current Colorado tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace