Did acquisition goodwill count as a target's business asset when deciding whether a worldwide filer was deemed to adopt the target's California water's-edge election?

Short answer Yes. Goodwill was an intangible business asset, had to be valued at adjusted net book value, and was attributed to the acquired target because it was inseparable from that business. Including the goodwill made the electing target's business assets larger than the nonelecting acquirer's, so the acquirer was deemed to make a water's-edge election.
State
CA
Ruling
Chief Counsel Ruling 2017-02
Tax type
Income and Franchise Tax
Issued
2017-09-08
Issued by
California Franchise Tax Board
Requested by
Redacted multistate corporate group

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 2017. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 2017
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is an official California Franchise Tax Board Chief Counsel Ruling issued to a redacted multistate group after an acquisition combined a worldwide filer with a water's-edge filer. The result depended on the represented unitary date, acquisition accounting, net-book-value adjustments, goodwill attribution, and comparative business-asset values. Chief Counsel Rulings are informational and nonprecedential and apply only to the named taxpayer and submitted facts. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

California Chief Counsel Ruling 2017-02 held that acquisition goodwill had to be included in the acquired target's business assets when applying the deemed water's-edge election test.

The nonelecting acquirer previously filed worldwide, while the target filed on a water's-edge basis. When they formed a new unitary group, California compared their business assets.

Including the target's acquisition goodwill made the target's total business assets larger. The acquirer therefore was deemed to adopt the target's water's-edge election.

Acquisition and filing facts

Before the acquisition, the acquirer and target were competing businesses. The acquirer bought all of the target's issued share capital and assumed its liabilities.

The acquirer had filed California returns on a worldwide basis. The target had filed on a water's-edge basis.

Acquisition accounting revalued the target's assets to fair market value and recorded goodwill. The consolidated financial statement placed that goodwill in a separate column rather than assigning it to a named legal entity.

The company initially concluded that the acquirer had more business assets and filed worldwide after the groups became unitary. It requested the ruling while recalculating net operating losses because the election result was uncertain.

California's deemed-election test

California generally required a unitary group to file worldwide unless it made a water's-edge election.

When an electing taxpayer and a nonelecting taxpayer became members of a new unitary affiliate group, section 25113(c)(2) compared their total business assets:

  • if the electing taxpayer's assets were larger, the nonelecting taxpayer was deemed to elect; and
  • otherwise, the existing water's-edge election automatically terminated.

The ruling described water's-edge elections and deliberate terminations as generally binding for 84 months.

Why goodwill counted as a business asset

Section 25113 broadly included intangible assets used in the unitary business and did not exclude goodwill.

Business assets were measured at net book value on the date the new unitary group formed. The valuation had to reflect original cost, depreciation, depletion, amortization, and appropriate impairment or reevaluation adjustments under United States GAAP or an allowed equivalent method.

The taxpayer represented that it had made the accounting adjustments needed to state the target's goodwill accurately as of the unitary date.

Why goodwill belonged to the target

FTB relied on the principle that goodwill has no separate existence apart from the ongoing business that created it.

The target's goodwill had developed over time, was integral to its operations, and was inseparable from the target. It therefore had to be attributed to the target even though the consolidated accounting report displayed it separately.

Election result

Once the goodwill was included, the target's total business assets exceeded the acquirer's.

Because the target was the water's-edge filer, section 25113(c)(2) deemed the acquirer to make a water's-edge election when the new unitary group formed.

What this means for you

Corporate acquirers

Do not omit acquisition goodwill merely because consolidated financial statements present it outside an entity-specific column. Determine which ongoing business generated and carries that goodwill.

Multinational combined groups

The comparative business-asset calculation can determine whether a worldwide or water's-edge filing method controls after a merger or acquisition.

Corporate tax departments

Preserve the unitary-group formation date, each component group's election status, entity-level and consolidated asset schedules, purchase accounting, goodwill impairment work, and net-book-value adjustments.

Common questions

Q: Did goodwill qualify as a business asset?

A: Yes. It was an intangible asset used in the business and no rule excluded it.

Q: Did separate-column presentation keep goodwill from the target?

A: No. FTB attributed it to the target business from which it was inseparable.

Q: How was goodwill valued?

A: At adjusted net book value using United States GAAP or an allowed equivalent method, including relevant impairment or reevaluation.

Q: Which group was larger after including goodwill?

A: The water's-edge target group.

Q: What happened to the worldwide acquirer?

A: It was deemed to make a water's-edge election.

Citations and references

  • Cal. Rev. & Tax. Code §§ 21012(a)(1) and 25113(c)(2), (c)(6)(A), (c)(6)(C), and (c)(11)
  • Cal. Code Regs., tit. 18, § 25113(b)(5), (b)(10), and (c)(1)
  • Pfleghar Hardware Specialty Co. v. Blair, 30 F.2d 614 (2d Cir. 1929)
  • Grace Bros. v. Commissioner, 173 F.2d 170 (9th Cir. 1949)
  • Appeal of Borden, 77-SBE-007 (Feb. 3, 1977)

Source

Original ruling text

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FRANCHISE TAX BOARD
chair Betty T. Yee| member Diane L. Harkey| member Michael Cohen

Legal Division MS A260
PO Box 1720
Rancho Cordova, CA 95741-1720
tel: 916.845.5842 fax: 916.843.6187
ftb.ca.gov

09.08.17
Chief Counsel Ruling 2017 -- 02





RE: Request for Chief Counsel Ruling **. *

Dear ***:

In correspondence dated June 23, 2017, you requested a Chief Counsel Ruling from the Franchise Tax Board ("FTB") seeking guidance on the inclusion of goodwill for applying the "deemed water's-edge election" business asset test per California Revenue and Taxation Code ("R&TC") section 25113(c)(2).1

******** represents that the issues in this ruling request are not the subject of an existing California audit, protest, or litigation concerning the Company.

FACTS

The Company represents the facts as set forth below:

** is an *-based * * and
* ** * *. As of * , *, the Company operated in ** states, including California.

The Company requested this ruling to properly calculate its Net Operating Losses ("NOLs") due to the uncertainty of a deemed water's-edge election relating to the
* acquisition that created its ultimate parent, *** *** ("Ultimate Parent"), as detailed below.

* ** Acquisition

*** ("the Acquirer") acquired *** and affiliates ("the Target") on * . The newly combined company was renamed
** *** ("New Company").

1 Unless otherwise specified, “R&TC section” or “R&TC §” references are to the California Revenue and

Taxation Code currently in effect and “CCR section” or “CCR §” references the California Code of Regulations, title 18, currently in effect.


Page 2

09.08.17
Chief Counsel Ruling 2017-02
Page 2 of 5

Prior to the acquisition, the Acquirer and the Target were competing ** *** **
*** based in the
*. The Acquirer acquired 100 percent of the issued share capital of the Target for *, including the assumption of the Target's outstanding liabilities.

Because financial accounting rules require an acquired company's assets be re- valued to fair market value upon acquisition, the Target's assets were restated to fair market value. Following the acquisition, the Company's **** consolidated financial statement detail report did not attribute goodwill to any specific legal entity and instead goodwill was recorded in a distinct column.

As of * * *, the net book value of business assets of the Acquirer and the Target was * and *, respectively. The Target's net book value of business assets included goodwill in the amount of ** due to acquisition accounting rules promulgated through the International Financial Reporting Standards ("IFRS").

California Tax Filing History

Leading up to the * acquisition, the Acquirer filed on a worldwide basis while the Target filed on a water's-edge basis. The Company concluded that it was unitary and, as of * ***, the Acquirer had the larger value of business assets than the Target. Thus, the Company filed prospectively on a worldwide basis.


** *, *** *** ** ** ** * *** **
. * * ** * ** * **
* ** *** *** * . ***
* *** * * * **.

ISSUE

Whether goodwill, recorded as a result of the Acquirer's acquisition of the Target, should be reflected in the total business assets of the Target, so that the Target's total business assets value was greater than that of the Acquirer, and the Acquirer was thus deemed to have made a water's-edge election per R&TC section 25113(c)(2) when the new unitary affiliate group was established on * *
***?

HOLDING

Goodwill recorded as a result of the Acquirer's acquisition of the Target should be reflected in the total business assets of the Target, resulting in a greater value of the Target's total business assets than that of the Acquirer when the new unitary affiliate group was established on * * ***. Accordingly, pursuant to R&TC section 25113(c)(2), the Acquirer was deemed to have made a water's-edge election.


Page 3

09.08.17
Chief Counsel Ruling 2017-02
Page 3 of 5

DISCUSSION

Deemed Water's-Edge Election

California requires unitary groups to file on a worldwide combined basis unless an election is made to file a water's-edge combined report. Both a water's-edge election and a deliberate termination of a water's-edge election are generally binding for 84 months. 2 R&TC section 25113(c) and the regulation thereunder address the effect of water's-edge elections due to corporate events such as acquisitions, mergers, consolidations, or disaffiliations between electing and non-electing affiliates after a valid election is made.

R&TC section 25113(c)(2) specifically states:

If an electing taxpayer and a nonelecting taxpayer become members of a new unitary affiliate group, the nonelecting taxpayer shall be deemed to have elected if the value of the total business assets of the electing taxpayer, and its component unitary group, if any, is larger than the value of the total business assets of the nonelecting taxpayer, and its component unitary group, if any. Otherwise, the water's-edge election shall be automatically terminated at the time electing members become part of the combined report. For purposes of applying paragraphs (9) and (10), the commencement date of the deemed election shall be the same as the commencement date of the electing taxpayers.

"Business assets" as defined under R&TC section 25113(c)(6)(A) includes intangible assets, except the stock of a member of the unitary affiliate group, which is used in the conduct of the business of the unitary affiliate group. This definition of business assets is broad. No exception to the statute or regulations specifically excludes goodwill from the definition of business assets for purposes of calculating the business asset test. Therefore, goodwill should be included in the calculation of the business asset test for purposes of R&TC section 25113(c)(2).

In this regard, business assets are valued at their net book value as of the date the electing taxpayers and non-electing taxpayers or non-taxpayers become members of a new unitary affiliate group. 3 The valuation of a business asset for purposes of R&TC section 25113(c)(2) necessitates appropriate adjustments per the "net book value" definition in CCR section 25113(b)(5):

2 R&TC § 25113(c)(11) and CCR § 25113(c)(1).
3 CCR § 25113(b)(10). The phrase "new unitary affiliate group" refers to a unitary group that is created by a

new affiliation of two or more corporations, or by the addition of one or more new members to an existing unitary affiliate group. R&TC § 25113(c)(6)(C).


Page 4

09.08.17
Chief Counsel Ruling 2017-02
Page 4 of 5

Net book value is equal to an asset's original cost minus depreciation, depletion and amortization. Book value means the amount which an asset is carried on a balance sheet. …. Book value . . . will be reflected using United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (US GAAP). If any member of a component unitary group does not maintain its books on US GAAP, the Franchise Tax Board may allow an alternative method of valuation of that member's business assets.

Goodwill is generally defined as the excess of the purchase price of a company over its book value, which represents the value of goodwill as an intangible asset for accounting purposes. 4 According to United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles ("US GAAP") and the IFRS, goodwill is not amortized, and instead a determination of an impairment is generally required on a yearly basis. 5 Therefore, in order to accurately reflect the value of goodwill for the business asset test, an impairment or other reevaluation must be considered under US GAAP or an equivalent accounting method. 6

The Company represents that between the acquisition on * * and the FTB determination that the Acquirer and the Target became unitary as of * *
, it had made all the appropriate accounting adjustments to reflect the accurate goodwill net book value of ** on that date per CCR section 25113(b)(5). 7

Attribution of Goodwill

From an income tax perspective, the courts have recognized goodwill is inseparable from a particular business's ongoing operations. In Pfleghar Hardware Specialty Co. v. Blair, the court explained:

Good will [sic] has no existence except in connection with a going business; it cannot be separated from the going business to which it is incident. A seller who disposes of his manufacturing plant as a going concern necessarily parts with all those advantages which are inherent in conducting an established business at that plant; in other words, parts with his good will [sic] [Citations omitted]. 8

California case law implies that goodwill attaches to the acquired entity. In Appeal of Borden, the Board of Equalization ("BOE"), quoting a federal decision, stated:

4 See Merriam-Webster Dictionary online, https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/goodwill and

Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") §§ 805-20-25-1 and 805-20-30-1. 5 See Financial Accounting Standards Board, ("FASB") Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, Goodwill and

Other Intangible Assets.
6 CCR § 25113(b)(5) requires taxpayers electing water's-edge to use US GAAP, or "the Franchise Tax Board may

allow an alternative method of valuation of that member's business assets." 7 The Company further represents an accurate comparison of net book values was performed as the Acquirer's

goodwill was also correctly valued and considered when compared to Target's net book assets. 8 Pfleghar Hardware Specialty Co. v. Blair (2d Cir. 1929) 30 F.2d 614, 616-17.


Page 5

09.08.17
Chief Counsel Ruling 2017-02
Page 5 of 5

Whether acquired by purchase or built up over a period of time, the advantage or benefit of goodwill makes possible the profitable operation of a business. Indeed, goodwill is so essential to the viable conduct of a business that it has been held to be inseparable from the business as a whole (Grace Bros. v. Commissioner, 173 F.2d 170, 175-176 (9th Cir. 1949). 9

Thus, the value of the Target's goodwill was built up over time and was integral to the Target's business operations. It is therefore inseparable from the Target and must be attributed to it.

CONCLUSION

Goodwill recorded as a result of the Acquirer's acquisition of the Target should be included as a business asset of the Target for purposes of applying the "deemed water's-edge election" business asset test per R&TC section 25113(c)(2). Because the value of the Target's total business assets, including the goodwill, was larger than that of the Acquirer when the new unitary affiliate group was established on
* * ***, the Acquirer was deemed to have made a water's-edge election.

Please be advised that the tax consequences expressed in this Chief Counsel Ruling are applicable only to the named taxpayer and are based upon and limited to the facts you have submitted. In the event of a change in relevant legislation, or judicial or administrative case law, a change in federal interpretation of federal law in cases where our opinion is based upon such an interpretation, or a change in the material facts or circumstances relating to your request upon which this opinion is based, this opinion may no longer be applicable. It is your responsibility to be aware of these changes, should they occur.

This letter is a legal ruling by the Franchise Tax Board's Chief Counsel within the meaning of paragraph (1) of subdivision (a) of section 21012 of the Revenue and Taxation Code. Please attach a copy of this letter and your request to the appropriate return(s) (if any) when filed or in response to any notices or inquiries which might be issued.

Very truly yours,

Elizabeth Rodoni
Tax Counsel

9 Appeal of Borden, 77-SBE-007 (February 3, 1977).

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 2017. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace