Was a surplus boat subject to California use tax when its only in-state activity was overhaul before qualifying out-of-state operations?

Short answer Not if the facts were as stated. Documentation alone did not create an exemption, but section 6368 could cover qualifying fishing or transportation-for-hire use, and section 6009.1 excluded California overhaul-only use before transportation and use solely outside the state.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 600.0140
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1957-11-15
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
Board compliance staff reviewing a redacted surplus-boat purchaser

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1957. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1957
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is a November 15, 1957 California State Board of Equalization internal tax-counsel memorandum published by CDTFA as support for a sales and use tax annotation. It concerns a redacted purchaser's 38-foot Navy-surplus picket boat and intended future use. Its conclusions depend on the purchaser's actual purpose and use, and it cites historical federal vessel-documentation provisions. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A purchaser acquired a 38-foot picket boat from Navy Surplus Sales, planned to overhaul it in California, and claimed it was a documented vessel.

California said federal registration, enrollment, or licensing only showed that the vessel could engage in foreign or domestic traffic. Documentation by itself did not establish a sales-and-use-tax exemption.

Two possible exemptions depended on actual purpose. Section 6368 could apply if the boat was bought for commercial deep-sea fishing outside California territorial waters or interstate or foreign transportation for hire. Separately, section 6009.1 excluded California storage or use undertaken only to prepare property for transportation and use solely outside the state. Pleasure or other nonqualifying California use would trigger tax.

What this means for you

Vessel purchasers, shipyards, and maritime tax advisers

Preserve purchase plans, overhaul records, departure evidence, and operating logs. Federal vessel documentation is evidence of possible trade use, not proof of a California tax exemption.

Common questions

Q: Did documented-vessel status itself create an exemption?

A: No.

Q: Could California overhaul work occur without taxable use?

A: Yes, if that was the only in-state use before transportation and use solely outside California.

Q: What if the boat was used for pleasure in California?

A: The memorandum said use tax would apply.

Citations and references

  • California Revenue and Taxation Code §§ 6009.1 and 6368
  • 46 U.S.C.A. §§ 18 and 801, as cited in the source
  • Gibbons v. Ogden, 22 U.S. 1 (1824), as cited in the source

Source

Original ruling text

600.0140

November 15, 1957

Marysville - Compliance
Hdqrs. - Tax Counsel (GAT)

This is in reply to your memo dated October 22, to Unit 3, re­ garding application of use tax to a 38-foot picket boat purchased by from Navy Surplus Sales. Mr. intends to overhaul the boat and use it in Alaska or in the It is questioned whether use tax is applicable, in that Mr. claims that the boat is a "documented vessel".

~

It is our understanding that every vessel of the United States engaged in foreign trade must be "registered" with the U.S. and vessels engaged in domestic commerce must be "enrolled". The pur:.. pose of a register is to declare the nationality of a vessel en­ gaged in trade with foreign nations and to enable her to assert that nationality wherever found. The purpose of an enrollment is to evidence the national character of a vessel engaged in the coasting trade or home traffic. Gibbons v. Ogden, 22 U.S. 1, 6

L.Ed. 23.

The term "documented" under the laws of the U.S. means "regis­ tered, enrolled, or licensed under the laws of the U.S., 46 U.S.C.A. Sec. 801. The register, enrollment and license, or li­ cense of a vessel of the U.S. are referred to, respectively, as the vessel's document. 46 u.s.c.A. Sec. 18. On the basis of the foregoing, it is our opinion that the fact that a vessel is documented is merely evidence that it may be used for either foreign or domestic traffic. Storage or use of this vessel is not subject to use tax if such storage or use comes within the terms of the watercraft exemp­ tion, provided in Revenue and Taxation Code Section 6368 and Ruling 51.5. If our understanding of the facts is correct, that the vessel was purchased for use in commercial deep sea fishing operations outside the territorial waters of this state, or for use in interstate or foreign commerce for hire, then it seems that its use would be exempt from tax. However, if the boat is to be used for pleasure or some other purpose in this state not within the terms of the watercraft exemption, it will be subject to use tax.

600.0140
Marysville - Comp.

-2-

November 15, 1957

An additional basis for exemption from use tax, which may apply

to the facts of the instant case, is that provided in Section 6009.1, Revenue and Taxation Code. Under Section 6009.1, tax­ able "storage" and "use" do not include the keeping, retaining or exercising any right or power over tangible personal property for the purpose of subsequently transporting it outside the state for use solely outside the state . If Mr.
; only
storage and use of the vessel in this state is for the purpose of overhauling it, such storage or use is not subject to tax.

GAT:ch

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1957. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace