Did firewood sold to a restaurant chain for cooking pizzas qualify for the section 6358.1 waste-by-product fuel exemption?

Short answer No. Firewood can be a forest-operation waste by-product when produced incidentally, but a restaurant cooking pizzas was not an industrial facility. That purchaser requirement failed regardless of the firewood's origin.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 596.0335
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1995-01-20
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
Board audit-refund staff reviewing a firewood seller's claim

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1995. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1995
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is a January 20, 1995 California State Board of Equalization staff-counsel memorandum published by CDTFA as support for a sales and use tax annotation. It concerns retail firewood sales to a restaurant chain using the wood to cook pizzas. The decision rests on the restaurant not being an industrial facility and does not decide that every kind of firewood fails waste-by-product status. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A firewood and charcoal seller claimed that firewood sold to a restaurant chain for cooking pizzas was exempt under section 6358.1(a)(2).

California said firewood can be a waste by-product when it arises incidentally while timber is processed into another product. Wood harvested specifically as firewood is not a by-product.

The claim failed on a separate requirement. A restaurant cooking pizzas was not an industrial facility, so the exemption did not apply whether or not the particular firewood qualified as forest-operation waste.

What this means for you

Restaurants, firewood sellers, biomass suppliers, and tax advisers

Test both sides of the exemption: the fuel's origin and the purchaser's facility. A qualifying waste material still may be taxable when used by a nonindustrial customer.

Common questions

Q: Can firewood ever be a waste by-product?

A: Yes, when incidentally produced in forest-products processing.

Q: Was a pizza restaurant an industrial facility?

A: No.

Q: Were the sales taxable?

A: Yes.

Citations and references

  • California Revenue and Taxation Code §§ 6051 and 6358.1(a)(2)
  • Union Oil Co. v. State Board of Equalization, 224 Cal. App. 3d 665 (1990)

Source

Original ruling text

596.0335
State of California

Board of Equalization

Memorandum

To:

From:

Subject:

Mr. Michael P. Kitchen
Audit Refund Section (MIC:39)

Date:

January 20, 1995

Victor G. Matl
Staff Counsel
Application of waste by product exemption to sales of firewood used to cook pizzas. In your memorandum dated September 15, 1994, you request assistance from our office regarding the application of Revenue and Taxation Code section 6358.1, the waste byproduct exemption, to sales of firewood by the taxpayer to a customer, a restaurant chain. The taxpayer is a seller of firewood and charcoal. The restaurant chain is a retailer of food products who uses the firewood as a source of heating to cook pizzas. The taxpayer requests the Board’s interpretation of this exemption with respect to the firewood. The taxpayer asserts that its otherwise taxable retail sales of firewood to the restaurant are exempt under Revenue and Taxation Code section 6358.1 because firewood is a waste byproduct and the customer satisfies the definition of an “industrial facility” by being engaged in “the commercial production of goods and services.” Retail sales of tangible personal property in California are subject to sales tax measured by gross receipts, unless specifically exempt by statute. (Rev. & Tax. Code § 6051.) The applicable exemption here is provided by Revenue and Taxation Code section 6358.1: “(a) There are exempted from taxes imposed by this part the gross receipts from the sale of and the storage, use, or other consumption in this state of either of the following: “.... “(2) Waste byproducts from agricultural or forest products operations, municipal refuse, or manufacturing, which are used in an industrial facility as a fuel source in lieu of the use of either oil, natural gas or coal.” There are two issues which need to be addressed. First, whether the property sold qualifies as a waste byproduct. Second, whether the purchaser qualifies as an industrial facility. The term “waste byproducts” is not defined in section 6358.1 nor elsewhere in the Revenue and Taxation Code. Those words must therefore be given the meaning they bear in ordinary use. Union Oil Company v. State Board of Equalization (1990) 224 Cal.App.3rd. 665.) A “byproduct” is

anything incidentally produced in the course of making another thing. (See Webster’s New World Dictionary, Third College Edition, at page 192.) The “forest products operation” may include processing cut trees into logs and, eventually, into wood products. In the course of the processing for purpose of “making another thing,” such as cut commercial lumber, incidental products may result. Firewood is one such possible incidental product. Thus, it is possible for firewood to be a waste byproduct of forest products operations. On the other hand, a person may harvest timber specifically for firewood. Under these circumstances, the firewood is not a waste byproduct of forest products operations. While we agree with the taxpayer that there is no statutory definition of “industrial facility,” we disagree with the taxpayer’s broad description of “industrial facility” as being “the commercial production of goods and services.” The Webster’s Third New International Dictionary at page 1155 defines “industrial” more accurately as “employed in a manufacturing service.” We do not regard a restaurant which cooks pizzas to be employed or engaged in industrial production or service. Therefore, we conclude that the retailer of food products does not fit the general description of “industrial facility.” Your reference to Business Taxes Law Guide Annotation 440.1320 (3/2/56) is not relevant to this case. The taxpayer does not claim that the firewood was sold for resale. The sole basis for the taxpayer’s claim is that its otherwise taxable sale is exempt under Revenue and Taxation Code section 6358.1. In conclusion, whether or not the firewood qualifies as “waste byproducts” from agricultural or forest products operations, the restaurant is not an “industrial facility.” Therefore, the waste byproducts exemption defined in section 6358.1 does not apply to the taxpayer’s sales of firewood to the restaurant and such sales are subject to tax. If you have additional questions, please to not hesitate to write. BGM:cl cc:

Arcadia District Administrator

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1995. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace