When does a vending-machine tax-included sign create excess tax reimbursement on exempt sales?

Short answer A sign limiting tax inclusion to taxable or applicable items presumes reimbursement only on taxable sales, so exempt sales do not create excess reimbursement. The published annotation contrasts that with a sign saying all sales include tax, which creates the opposite presumption.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 590.0150
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1993-09-09
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
Board supervising tax auditor reviewing a refund claim

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1993. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1993
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: The supporting PDF is a September 9, 1993 California State Board of Equalization tax-counsel memorandum addressing a 'tax included' sign and a vending refund claim. The official annotation also lists September 28, 1994 and adds the contrasting rule for signs stating that all sales include reimbursement; the 1993 PDF date controls frontmatter, and the later published addition is identified separately. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A vending operator posted the tax-included statement required by Civil Code section 1656.1. An audit found about 95% of the machine's food sales to students were exempt, even though the operator had paid tax on them and sought a refund.

The 1993 memorandum applied Regulation 1700's presumption that a properly limited tax-included sign includes reimbursement only in taxable sales. Exempt sales at the same posted price did not include tax reimbursement, so no excess reimbursement prevented the refund.

The published annotation later contrasts wording such as "tax included on all taxable items" or "applicable tax included" with "all sales include tax reimbursement." The latter creates a presumption that reimbursement was charged on every sale and therefore can create excess reimbursement on exempt transactions.

What this means for you

Vending operators, pricing teams, and refund advisers

Use precise posted language. Limit the tax-included representation to taxable or applicable items, and retain support separating exempt and taxable transactions.

Common questions

Q: Did the limited tax-included sign create excess reimbursement?

A: No.

Q: What wording creates greater risk?

A: A statement that all sales include tax reimbursement.

Q: Could the operator claim a refund of tax paid on exempt sales?

A: Yes, under the 1993 memorandum's facts because no reimbursement was deemed collected.

Citations and references

  • California Civil Code § 1656.1(b)(1)
  • California Sales and Use Tax Regulation 1700(a)(2)(C) and (b)(1)

Source

Original ruling text

590.0150
Mr. Norman Jung

State of California

-1-

September 9, 1993
590.0150
Board of Equalization
Legal Division

Memorandum
CONFIDENTIAL: ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE
To:

Mr. Norman Jung
GH - Supervising Tax Auditor

From:

John L. Waid
Tax Counsel

Subject:

SR GH REDACTED TEXT
Excess Tax Reimbursement

Date: September 9, 1993

I am responding to your memorandum of May 19, 1993, to the Legal Division. You indicate that the taxpayer ("REDACTED TEXT") has filed a timely claim for refund for sales taxes paid on sales of food to students through a vending machine. Affixed to the machine is the tax-included statement mandated by Civil Code Section 1656.1(b)(1). During REDACTED TEXT's audit it was determined that approximately 95% of its sales through this machine were qualified exempt sales. OPINION You indicate that your audit review section has two concerns regarding REDACTED TEXT's Claim for Refund. I will discuss these in the order you raise them.

  1. "Does this tax-included statement create an excess tax reimbursement situation for
    all exempt sales because all customers were notified that sales tax was included in the purchase price of the product. Regulation 1700(b)(1) states 'When an amount represented by a person to a customer as constituting reimbursement for sales tax is computed upon an amount that is not taxable or is in excess of the taxable amount and is actually paid by the customer to the person, the amount so paid is excess tax reimbursement.'" The regulation is very clear on this point: "Excess tax reimbursement is charged when reimbursement is computed on a transaction which is not subject to tax...." (Ibid.) REDACTED TEXT included tax reimbursement in the selling price of all of the tangible personal property at issue, a large proportion of which were exempt from tax, and even paid tax on those sales. You indicate that the auditor does not think there is excess tax reimbursement on the theory that the taxpayer's intent was to notify its customers to whom taxable sales were made that sales was included in the price. The auditor relies on the presumption in Regulation 1700(a)(2)(C) that the gross receipts from sales of items subject to

Mr. Norman Jung

-2-

September 9, 1993
590.0150

the sales tax is sold at a price which includes tax reimbursement if the tax-included statement at issue is posted in the retailer's premises. He concludes that where the sale was not subject to tax, the regulation resumes that reimbursement was not included in the sale price. We agree. While an argument can be made that the items as they sit in the vending machine are taxable and that their sales only become exempt if sold to the proper person, the better view, if only for the sake of administrative convenience is, to rely on the presumption stated above. Thus, we conclude that the tax-included statement sets up a presumption that reimbursement is included on only taxable sales. Exempt sales, though for the same price, do not include tax reimbursement. As a result, REDACTED TEXT is selling to students for one price and to non-students for a lesser price plus tax reimbursement. Since REDACTED TEXT collected no tax reimbursement, it may obtain a refund of the taxes it paid.

JLW:es
bc: San Jose District Administrator

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1993. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace