Did use tax apply when an inoperative vehicle received only a DMV title transfer and was not registered for operation?

Short answer The Board's position was no, but a title-only transfer followed shortly by registration could be investigated as a sham and taxed.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 580.0406.050
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1996-03-21
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
A Board auditor asking whether use tax applied to inoperative vehicles receiving title-only transfers

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1996. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1996
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is a March 21, 1996 California State Board of Equalization legal memorandum about an inoperative vehicle receiving only a DMV title transfer. It states the Board's position without developing the underlying use-tax theory and separately identifies section 6293 as applying to specified off-highway vehicles. Current title-only, nonoperation, registration, off-highway-vehicle, anti-sham, and use-tax rules may differ. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The memorandum stated that use tax did not apply when a person bought an inoperative vehicle, did not register it for operation, and obtained only a DMV title transfer.

That result did not protect a sham. If the purchaser obtained a title-only transfer and then registered the vehicle shortly afterward, the Consumer Use Tax Section could investigate and impose use tax if the arrangement was not genuine.

Section 6293 did not change the stated result because the memorandum read that section as addressing vehicles subject to identification under the Vehicle Code's off-highway-vehicle division.

Citations and references

  • California Revenue and Taxation Code section 6293 (as cited)
  • California Vehicle Code division 16.5, commencing with section 38000 (as cited)

Source

Original ruling text

State of California

Board of Equalization
Legal Division-MIC: 82
Telephone: 445-6450

Memorandum
To :

Ms. Margaret L. Pennington
Tax Auditor
Audit Review and Refunds - MIC:39

From :

Ronald L. Dick
Supervising Staff Counsel

Subject:

Application of Use Tax to the Use of Vehicles

580.0406.050
Date:

March 21, 1996

Your January 31, 1996 memorandum to Mr. David Levine regarding the application of use tax to purchases of vehicles has been referred to me for reply. You asked, “Is tax due upon purchase of vehicles not requiring registration because they will be inoperative for a period of time?” We understand that the situation to which you refer occurs when a person purchases a vehicle which is not registered for operation, and the person obtains only a title transfer from the Department of Motor Vehicles. It has been our position in such a case that the use tax does not apply. If a person were to purchase a vehicle under those circumstances to obtain a title only transfer and shortly thereafter register the vehicle, we understand the Consumer Use Tax Section would investigate to determine whether the transaction is a sham and, if so, impose use tax. We do not believe Revenue and Taxation Code section 6293 calls for a different result. That section provides the application of tax to the sale of a vehicle subject to identification under Division 16.5 (commencing with section 38000) of the Vehicle Code. (Those vehicles are certain “off-highway vehicles” such as certain motorcycles, snowmobiles, and dune buggy or all-terrain vehicles. If you have further questions regarding this feel free to contact me directly.

RLD:sr

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1996. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace